All Activity

I know I'd already grown a healthy bush by the time I had my sex ed lessons in year 6. I'd have been 11 then, but I think I had pubes from 10, possibly as young as 9. At the time of the sex ed lessons I'd already forgotten when it started, and I wanted to ask (anonymously) if you could work out when you started to grow pubes, but the teacher didn't understand my question, and tbh I'm not sure they would have if I explained it lol

Just had a Top from Grindr come over. He was built and had a 8" rock hard cock. He fucked a load in me and then went for round 2. He totally gaped my hole and when he pulled out to look at it he said Your Open lol

WHERE'S THE REST OF THIS STORY?

I agree with everyone that is good story. Keep going!

Neg bottom for Poz Toxic tops. I'm in Hawkes Bay so if your ever traveling through, give me a DM,

I've only been fucked by two different guys but I've blown at least 25.

With that hot bubble butt I don't doubt it.

TIGHT!

I know that scene! That bottom guy, Ken is so naturally masculine and clearly struggling to take Cole’s raw cock.

i brought up more than one topic. Will you be more specific about what you linked this article in response to? There's a lot here and connected to much of what you've written. It also seems we are coming from very different places, which i think puts broader value on this discussion, but also makes it harder to see the others points as they see them. Something i think factors (almost universally?) into this discussion is size. We've only selected a tiny portion of issues, but they're all big. Healthcare is a little more familiar to me because i work in healthcare, front lines. i have 1600 hours taking direct care of Covid+ patients the first two years of the pandemic. i'm also heavily invested in education and professional certifications regarding preventing and intervening in many of the major disease processes that beset western culture because of diet and exercise. i have a computer folder full of very specific studies on the topic, as well as continuing education. (bear with me, this is going someplace). Some of my patients trust me and my education as an authority. But i don't extend the same trust towards myself or peers, i go another layer and look for evidence. The thing is, before i became a professional, i didn't really understand what constitutes "evidence" like i do now. We have journals, peer review, professional experience where some can spot and point out flaws in studies. Long story short, "we know and see in part." So, "grace and trust," and questioning always (should?) factor in. The ability to doubt and always realize and add: "i could be wrong." One of the things i look for in a 'good' study is "more research is needed." To me, that's a humble admission that "we know and see in part." The process of ideal science tends to spread power and authority out vs concentrating or giving it to one or less people. i use healthcare and science as an example because i live it every day and am immersed in it. But to me, the framework can apply to so many things. We cannot all be healthcare professionals, so we end up trusting (or thinking we know enough from a youtube or book to accept our own conclusion rather than trusting an authority). We cannot all be engineers. We cannot all be plumbers, electricians, chefs, presidents, senators, ad infinitum. i think there has to be a mix. i educate my patients all the time, especially when it comes to their specific issues. But they still (usually) do not know as much as me or the doctor or the physical therapist or the pharmacist. And i go to all of these people as well to bolster my understanding of the infinite universe that is the human body. i often disappoint my patients (emotional) expectation for a panacea by telling them things like: "in medicine, we often kill ants with elephant guns." Sepsis is an example. Someone comes into the hospital with the signs and symptoms of sepsis. If we don't intervene, they will typically/statistically die. So, we load them with draw blood first, to help confirm the general diagnosis of sepsis, then give them fluids and then broad spectrum IV antibiotics. It's an elegant gun because we know they have an infection, but we do not necessarily know from what. That's one reason we draw blood prior to antibiotics, so we can culture the blood and know better what we are dealing with. But that takes a day or two for something to grow in a culture, and if we waited to treat until we knew better what we were treating, a lot of people would die. So we hit them with broad spectrum antibiotics, and often find out a couple of days later that one or the other was not even effective. Meanwhile, those antibiotics all have side effects. A major effect we are learning more about now is killing of beneficial bacteria in our gut that we live in symbiosis with. i have a bunch of medical examples, but the point is, reality is individually detailed, response is general, collective. "Governments role in the problem." i think 'we the people' have stepped too far away from government. Or put another way, i think we need to be more involved. To me, it comes down to balance and where we put our individual weight (i.e., time and effort). i can get some education about government and be more engaged. i can get education about healthcare and be more engaged. i can get more education about business and be more engaged. i can get more education about sports and be more engaged. You see where i am going with this no doubt, the list is endless and always involves some degree of trusting others. i think our government has potential to be representative, so "governments role" has the potential of being our role. But it will never be perfect because "we the people" are diverse individuals with diverse wants and needs. So, we end up having to kill ants with elephant guns. i like to work at a teaching hospital professionally, and go to a teaching hospital when sick because i'm always going to get a group of doctors looking at my patients or me vs just one authority. It's not a perfect comparison, but i would rather live in a democratic system than a more dictatorial one where one persuasion calls all the shots. To me, done 'right,' "government role" in a representative context is we the people collectively doing things like addressing the problems of defense, general welfare. As an individual, i can ride a bike, but i still have to ride behind someone's diesel pick up truck. As an individual, i can not smoke, but i may have grown up in an era where private money interests used doctors to advertise tobacco and smoking cigarettes as a healthy practice. When tobacco was exposed, many of the tobacco companies bought food manufacturering companies and applied the same principles to processing and engineering 'food' to be addictive by adding sugar, salt and fat... along with a lot of invented ingredient that our bodies are not adapted to. It's a vast topic, i can provide substantiation. The point i'm making is, size matters. As an individual, it's possible for me to choose from the infinite list of need to know topics that affect my life. Or, we can engage at a macro level and elect a government to "provide for the common defense and promote the general welfare." i think governments role in the problem is ever changing with circumstances. i do not see a black or white, simple answer, rather it seems an ongoing question with ever changing answers. sorry, this got long, and i know leaves so much out. Vast topic.

Love that Cole flips and takes it too.

My major fantasy at the moment is to be forced to wear a mask that makes me unable to see or listen, and be left tied, ass up in a darkroom to be used by anyone that wanders in there, so, yes, mask all the way

Good to know, I was down there twice this year, need to return soon!!

Hell yah, I can't wait for our paths to cross.