All Activity

Tight or loose is no big deal. Just don't be so tight it's hard to get inside and we'll be fine.

Strong motives are there. But overcoming the ingrained, established two party system isn’t easy. We do have a couple of independents in Sanders and King, but I can’t imagine us getting much farther than that. Too much money and tradition to overcome. And yes, with our presidential system, shift in factional coalition wouldn’t bring down the entire government. But I’d be willing to bet that the Republican house would have been dissolved during their 8 week tantrum and absence from DC. i don’t anticipate any real change in our system, but parliamentary systems look more effective to me.

@Pozzible as privately discussed, The discrepancy here is you were referencing coalitions yesterday. So on same page now. Re: motives... but if there were strong motives, we would have that today. We don't. And nothing legal or technical prevents it. Nothing. And many districts and Senate elections have other parties run, as well as independents. But our system, in trying to avoid the populism that type of government creates, was setup for checks and balances. So, the Prime Minister is not head of state... we have a President. Our effective PM is #3, the Speaker of the House. And the House and President (as well as Senate) have different terms to limit temporary political moments from breaking balance. Also, contrary to UK parliamentary procedure, our system doesn't allow a minority government -- a Speaker needs 50%+ of member vote for the role. So, if we did break into many factions -- again, fully possible today -- then informal coalition-building could happen. I have no idea what happens if no one passes that threshold. I don't think the elected Speaker must be a sitting member of the House either, but not 100% certain on that. And we do have factions, kinda. There's only one cross-party caucus I know of today, Problem Solvers. Otherwise many others exist within parties, even though some claim to be unaligned.

Gotta get dicked down like this

I appreciated both her comments on the cause, and Dems would not admit -- 1) bring to light certain issues (she notes in the video), and 2) stand up to Trump. The latter being politicking. I wish she offered a little less hyperbole early on with people being "blindsided" by the 8 Dems who joined the vote. The public reporting on this start late Wednesday night -- I even post same in "Shut Down" thread on Thursday. No one was shocked...or should have been. To that end, I think Angus King -- a politician I listen to a lot, as mentioned elsewhere -- has some good answers as he was one of the 8. A Katie Couric interview.

Clapp during a threesum with two women. The hotter one gave it to me and the other woman. Felt good to dump a load in both of them.

@tallslenderguy To regroup, You added the issue of income disparity above. But this is an effect, not a cause. The cause is what I was trying to get to in my last post. Our collective behavior. We make choices everyday about how and where we spend money and time. Over time, those choices have funneled more and more money to fewer and fewer people. I used Amazon as the example, of many. You quoted me, “Governments role in the problem.” and continued yourself, “I think ‘we the people’ have stepped too far away from government.” To be sure, as I wasn’t quite clear form your response, I said ‘role in the problem’ and not the Regean-like “…government is problem.” You state, “but i would rather live in a democratic system than a more dictatorial one where one persuasion calls all the shots.” I’m not sure who in the US feels differently so I'm not sure what you mean. Generally, people on one side of the political isle always feel left out after they lose an election. And that feeling, coupled with the over-reach I referenced (in the other thread) of the President’s party early in their term is why the President’s party typically loses the mid-term House election, it's been by a 10-1 margin since 1980. In terms of participation, I think we’re circling similar things..maybe? In the Amazon example I referenced consumer spending choice as part of the cause of income disparity. That is, with the vast sums we spend with them, companies can pay their employees with incrementally large salaries and wealth (stock options, 401k benefits, etc). We can participate is so many things EVERY DAY with our own choices – that’s participation too. Examples: buy local products or at least just from local/regional stores/chains (reduce income disparity and rebuild local communities) and take fewer air travel trips while also driving less (environmentalism). Most people choose not to bother, even those who claim to care about those issues. So there’s an open question: if we are ”the system” (in the on-going example) shouldn’t the first effort to fix a problem come from ourselves? I’ll leave this part here and let me know if I understood you correctly. I think there’s still more on your point re: participation. I’m not sure I got your point right. And @hntnhole for Pete’s comment, I was referring to him deflecting a question with “leave it to the municipalities.” It’s a new thing I’ve heard recently from multiple Dem politicians and is the same ”leave it to the state” or “State’s rights” Republican deflection. I’m unsure how you interpreted my comment by your reply.

great writing. so fucking hot...building to the breeding.

This was hot. Even also for me was a bit extreme. On the other w, it turned me on and started wait for the next time I can enjoy the pleasure of slamming and rush. Luckily it will be tomorrow when we have a ff session with my FFRIEND.

1. That's something that needs to be mentioned up front, and I consider corporal actions as needing prior notice. 2. Of course. A group of men celebrating their sexual depravities en-masse is always more fun. 3. I don't particularly like really tight holes. If I'm not the first/only Top, I'll more likely compliment a looser guy. 4. above. We Tops generally think of pumping our load the farthest in as possible as more possessive (I mean, in that moment). Thus the "connection" is amplified, concentrated. 5, I don't know .... I seldom do that. Maybe they like to watch a hungry hole gobble their entire cock, over and over again? 6. Never. If the day wasn't what it should have been, then I'm not inclined to drown it in another guy's hole. Mental acuity on the Top's part is really important. 7. C,

LOL ..... I thought I was the only one that did that !!! Plus, the housekeeper is a very "experienced" gay man, knows just about every other gay man in Ft. L. Usually, we talk politics more than he pretends to clean .... great guy though. I make it a point to be doing something else while he cleans the bathroom ......

Well said. Each of us probably wishes we were x, or had y, or this or that. Being a bit on the thick side, it's just easier for me to rut in either an already well-fucked hole, or a guy with an elastic hole that can open more or close up more, depending on the cock fucking him. Really tight holes aren't my first choice .... or second or third.

That may be the case, however the closer any elected official is (I mean proximity), the more closely they can monitor where the electorate happens to be on any given issue. This would reasonably enable those locally-elected Dems to be in close touch with their constituents, which would be a good thing. It seems the farther up the food-chain a pol is, the less they tend to be in touch with any local issues in their district. The way to change that isn't all that tough: have demonstrations, write letters, make phone calls, organize - in other words, do something.

Definitely in my late teens. I figured out that out before I figured out being gay.

You're a great writer, I really enjoy your twisted perspective.

I'm not really sure how to put it, but maybe I was just born a bottom. I think I just always knew that I would enjoy being a bottom more. Even with my first experiences I could take cocks and toys without any real struggle, my body instinctively knew what to do. In porn I always imagined myself as the guy being fucked, so I guess I never discovered it... I just was and still am an insatiable bottom. Nowadays, I top from time to time and apparently I'm alright at it, but it's never my first choice.