fuzzybttm
-
Posts
1,383 -
Joined
-
Last visited
.thumb.jpg.b238115a83393eb0dc5d76fcb7df4055.jpg)
.thumb.jpg.8c2c62d740af2ce1fd62beedf27c00a3.jpg)
fuzzybttm's Achievements
-
mmmmm, need bottoms for that? 😛
-
Should Cum Dumps be allowed to access to their own cocks?
fuzzybttm replied to Thedogsbolloxxl2's topic in General Discussion
This. I know these forums are supposed to be hot and folks get off on fantasy, but these questions of "should [x]" I'm never a fan of because there's no correct answer, do what makes you horny and just have fun. Even a cum dump session, which is ostensibly about the tops, you're choosing to host because you enjoy being the dump. Do what makes you randy. -
Where did you get (or give) your last load?
fuzzybttm replied to rawTOP's topic in General Discussion
Night before new years I spent a solid 1.5 hours with this nice thick cock all the way down my throat, past the gag reflex, with only passing out as a north star for breathing. Finally, he nutted so far down my throat I didn't even taste it! -
It's a bit of a perverse way of thinking about consent, but the unwritten social contract of being an "all loads" cumdump is that "all loads" answers all questions, so don't ask any. If you do, you run the risk of testing "all" because even though the implied consent is in the invitation to use the cumdump, a cumdump (or someone acting as the dump's handler) always has the ability to turn someone away for any reason, or else the scene has decidedly veered into sexual assault and/or rape. The fantasy of "all loads" is hot, but the reality is almost all people aren't actually living out their greatest fantasies, and even the highly tolerant and risk-seeking have limits. I think a great example are the many barebackers chasing HIV but when they get gono go get treated and take a pause so as to not spread that separate STI. Taking it back to this instance, if this top didn't disclose, he would've been able to partake in the fantasy, and you would have been none the wiser as to what he'd exposed you to. It is in fact a perverse incentive to withhold information to maintain the fantasy. But once he disclosed, he broke the fantasy and the unwritten open consent, and that's just tough luck on his part. Reality's a bitch, and at the end of the day people act differently with known consequences, and they're allowed to. Which is my way of saying I agree.
-
Not only that, if you're confident in your clean-out, go ahead and push down and really open your depths up to the cock as it penetrates deeper. Pushing and releasing adds even more textures to the experience and feels amazing (I've been told on both ends though as a strict bottom I can't really confirm for tops).
-
Every been scared or freaked out by what happens to you?
fuzzybttm replied to Sub-Cocksucker's topic in General Discussion
Let's be clear, active consent is consent, a lot of things that are not consent can be feigned to look like consent. You can also, in some ways, enjoy things to which you didn't consent (i.e. a turn-on doesn't mean consent). That said, in this instance, it appears that you seem to be into the outcome whether or not consent was given, and you wanna move your goalposts or you know your dom wants to but you're a bit freaked, that's what a conversation's for. Sounds like you two just need to get back on the same page, the far dirtier far piggier one -
I think there's an important feature to successful spitroasting - the tops have to work together to use the bottom, and not act independently. Spit roasting is usually less than ideal, and you have to choose whether to focus on the blowjob or the fucking, because once you're getting fucked, Top #2 shoves your face into his crotch without moving or adjusting, syncing up with the rhythm and movement, and just going straight for the deepthroat on the first plunge and holds it there too long. That said, when the tops are good together, and not just separately simultaneously, the oral component helps deepen the piggery. It's cognizant of breathing differently when getting pounded from behind, it's rhythmic, and it syncs well, then I am just in heaven.
-
While it's subjective, I think the defining characteristic is approach to sex. A slut is basically a harsh term for a hedonist that pursues pleasure through sex actively, willfully, and eagerly across multiple partners. I don't think there's a minimum frequency requirement, other than "somewhat regularly."
-
Barebacking: what's in it for the bottom?
fuzzybttm replied to bbicurious's topic in Making The Decision To Bareback
It's a combination of things for me, really. First, it feels more immediate and real without any barrier. Second, and this of course varies with your (i) status and (ii) use (or not) of PrEP, but there's fun in risk, it heightens sensation and elevates the stakes in a thrilling way. Third, I like feeling the load being shot into me, and I love the feeling as it sloshes around and slowly tries to leak out. Fourth, I like that the top, after nutting in my guts, can go in and eat my hole out and I can make out with him and taste my fresh load. It's not the penetration that is fundamentally different (yeah it feels a bit different and I prefer the feeling of skin but that's not the end-all-be-all for me), it's everything else that is getting bred, that you don't get when there's a rubber in the way. -
Twitter Videos - Please place all Twitter videos here
fuzzybttm replied to DenverBtmDude's topic in Bareback Porn Discussion
No, it's the real Horsemarket event. They held one specifically that was going to be fully filmed, and so everyone who attended had to be willing to sign a release and appear in the video, and all of the porn folks just, well, came as themselves. Horsemarket is based out of SF, so it's not like there's any shortage of porn folks. But most Horsemarket events aren't documented for public consumption. is there a skew toward porn folks because of the explicit public-facing nature of this specific Horsemarket event? Sure. But it wasn't exclusive to them, wasn't a masscollab or anything, it's just a self-selection bias. -
How unusual is it for a bottom not to use poppers?
fuzzybttm replied to backdoorjimmy's topic in General Discussion
Yay for active reading skills! Cheers back at ya pig 😉 -
How unusual is it for a bottom not to use poppers?
fuzzybttm replied to backdoorjimmy's topic in General Discussion
Hi! All that makes sense, and I intentionally limited my remarks to bottoms I know for these very reasons. Poppers should never be mandatory, they just so happen to be a de-facto constant amongst those bottoms I know in person -
Do your friends and family know you're a slut?
fuzzybttm replied to LondonLegendUK's topic in General Discussion
Absolutely not, just as I don't really want to know what they do behind closed doors (or anywhere else for that matter). My family is hardly prudish, but I just don't figure that they care to know how often I take it up the ass, and I'd certainly not want to know if/when family members are at it. -
How unusual is it for a bottom not to use poppers?
fuzzybttm replied to backdoorjimmy's topic in General Discussion
i personally always use them, and the only bottoms I know that don't are fully sober and count poppers (though I also know sober bottoms who still use poppers, obviously a personal choice and I'm just reporting). I know some tops it fucks with their erection and they don't like it. But I personally don't know any bottoms (other than 100% sober guys) that never use them. -
What annoys you most about gay porn.
fuzzybttm replied to Barebackpiggy's topic in Bareback Porn Discussion
This is why I love chastity bottoms in porn where there's a defined top and a defined bottom, esp in cumdump scenes. If it's a vers orgy, I get it, you want all dicks to be impressive as they dive into holes. But for defined bottom roles, I love a little chastity nub, the dick's irrelevant if it ain't going in any holes!
