Carlos1881 Posted December 31, 2020 Report Share Posted December 31, 2020 Hey guys so the word on the street is that “throuples,” or polyamorous relationship will be the new normal in future ... Do you think it could work if one was sensible, one was sexual and the third was a combination of the two ? Or Would you prefer a combo of three filthy pigs ? 😈 What are your thoughts guys ? 😉 Karl 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shortstackhole Posted December 31, 2020 Report Share Posted December 31, 2020 i prefer the combo of three pigs but im a hedonist so im not interested in romantic relationships 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phallarchist Posted December 31, 2020 Report Share Posted December 31, 2020 I would match one man with two boys. Faggot cunt requires a lot of maintenance time, so having two in circulation increases cunt availability for the man. If a boy had a random male urge, he could dissipate it in the other boy (with the man's permission) and return to female service. 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PupLucca Posted December 31, 2020 Report Share Posted December 31, 2020 Give me a mix of romantic and piggy and I'm happy 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ErosWired Posted December 31, 2020 Report Share Posted December 31, 2020 4 hours ago, Phallarchist said: I would match one man with two boys. Faggot cunt requires a lot of maintenance time, so having two in circulation increases cunt availability for the man. If a boy had a random male urge, he could dissipate it in the other boy (with the man's permission) and return to female service. I’m not sure I quite follow your reasoning. The key to maintaining cunt readiness is routine, discipline and regular use. While I can see an obvious benefit to having a spare, I’m not sure I see how the arrangement improves the issue of maintenance - in fact, since an alternate exists, it might even be a disincentive to maintain readiness. If, however, the second were chosen as a true Vers, rather than simply having a “random male urge”, the demand on the committed cunt would be amplified to a degree that routine and discipline would become essential. Personally, I could take an interest in serving as the cunt in such a “throuple”, but in a relationship sense my role would only be to facilitate the relationship between the other two. I don’t consider myself relationship material. So in that sense, I’m not sure it would be considered a true “throuple” any more than would two partners and their dog. The dog might be part of their “family”, but the relationship is between the two. In my case, I’m also not sure I would thrive if the couple did not also extend my use freely to their friends and guests, or in some other way ensure my obligation to public service. I suppose this all just points out how any such situation is highly dependent on individual variables and any broad statement about the workability of such arrangements is dubious. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evilalex Posted December 31, 2020 Report Share Posted December 31, 2020 I want pig boys. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pozpunk Posted December 31, 2020 Report Share Posted December 31, 2020 Three filthy toxic pigs would be perfect? Even though 40 or so strangers do most of my inseminating , I’m happy so long as I’m living as a aidswore, and used regularly by horny gays who know me well. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cumpigmelb Posted December 31, 2020 Report Share Posted December 31, 2020 I would love to be the bottom hole for two Poz viral tops we can all be pigs. They can all try to poz my neg hole no jealousy if anyone wants to bring home a plane load of Poz viral tops too no load refused Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ErosWired Posted December 31, 2020 Report Share Posted December 31, 2020 In looking back at the OP’s original question, I find myself a little confused with what is meant by “sensible” and “sexual” in this context, especially as contrasted with “filthy pigs”. Is the first option meant to be understood as “one filthy pig, one who only has mild sex occasionally and does not think piggy sex is sensible (I have in my mind at this moment a very strange image of Sam the Eagle from the Muppets), and a third who can take it or leave it? Or something else completely? What is sensible, sexual, sensibly sexual and/or sexually sensible are all highly subjective, and on the piggier end of the scale there’s probably not much that doesn’t qualify no matter how you define it. Would the OP care to clarify? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evilqueerpig Posted January 1, 2021 Report Share Posted January 1, 2021 For me, the ideal would be all vers and equally piggy...and kissing! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tanbbottom Posted January 1, 2021 Report Share Posted January 1, 2021 Fully open piggy throuple for me. Just celebrate all the bb breeding we can attract into this polyamorous arrangement. I want every member of my 'family ' to be free to enjoy themselves with total abandon! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phallarchist Posted January 2, 2021 Report Share Posted January 2, 2021 On 12/31/2020 at 8:50 AM, ErosWired said: While I can see an obvious benefit to having a spare, I’m not sure I see how the arrangement improves the issue of maintenance I have digestion mostly in mind. A faggot has to have an empty stomach or an empty and cleansed colon to be useful. It's unrealistic to impose both conditions on a boy's body every day. It's better that that he take enema rest and heal on alternate days at least. A 2:1 ratio also goes some way to satisfy the male ego and desire for variety. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PigBoyDallas Posted January 4, 2021 Report Share Posted January 4, 2021 I know a throuple and they’ve been together for several years. I was amazed by this and the one indicated the key for it to work is for all three to be into each equally. It can’t be you’re just into the one and kind of meh about the other...you have to be wanting to fuck all the time with the other two. They’ve had me join them for sex a couple times and it’s pretty wild. It works for them but I don’t know it would work for everyone or for me. I know I’m not capable of monogamy so being in a relationship probably wouldn’t work well. I don’t know any other throuples so tough to know for sure based off of the one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
piglooking4pigs Posted January 4, 2021 Report Share Posted January 4, 2021 On 12/31/2020 at 7:02 AM, Phallarchist said: I would match one man with two boys. Faggot cunt requires a lot of maintenance time, so having two in circulation increases cunt availability for the man. If a boy had a random male urge, he could dissipate it in the other boy (with the man's permission) and return to female service. I am in love with this man! LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evilqueerpig Posted March 5, 2023 Report Share Posted March 5, 2023 Had to add this...need a BIG BAD WOLF! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now