HungLatinDom Posted December 12, 2012 Report Share Posted December 12, 2012 Thanks a lot ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bjbottom Posted December 12, 2012 Report Share Posted December 12, 2012 Based on my own experiences I would say the odds are low. I am a bareback bottom, and I have bottomed for at least 200 guys who were positive but claimed to be undetectable over the years and I have still remained negative. My own standard is as long as a top is undetectable and on medications, he can deposit his load in me. I know there are some risks since some studies suggest the viral load in higher in semen then in blood (meaning the virus could be present in the semen) but I know, understand and accept that risk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike43 Posted December 12, 2012 Report Share Posted December 12, 2012 nice too know thamks for info Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neg4deathseed Posted December 12, 2012 Report Share Posted December 12, 2012 In my personal experience,it seems as long as the poz top is taking meds and undetectable,then its very low risk..and this coming from a neg bottom who's taken plenty of poz loads..id guess at least 50..and nothing ever happened,I do think it has to do with how strong your immune system is...mine is very strong..haven't had a cold,flu or anything in over 15yrs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Matias47 Posted December 12, 2012 Report Share Posted December 12, 2012 [\QUOTE] Also, if a guy says he is undetectable, he will have paperwork to prove it within the past three months. Stay neg as long as you can. Actually, that's not quite accurate. Many doctors as a rule don't provide copies of all paperwork. In my entire life I've never automatically be given copies of test results unless I've requested them. When I do my blood work, every 6 months now, not 3, we go over my results and the paper goes into my file unless I request a copy. So their are going to be plenty of guys without recent paperwork -- though we all probably should. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rcc226 Posted December 12, 2012 Report Share Posted December 12, 2012 detectable medicated poz men have extremely low chance of passing the virus. If you wanna get pozzed, take loads from guys who *think* they're negative. chances are, you'll eventually come up on newly pozzed guy that's unaware his VL is shooting through the roof. That's the most likely route of transmission. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TigerMilner Posted December 12, 2012 Report Share Posted December 12, 2012 Here is the info from the CDC. Google the study and you will find a number of articles. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21767103 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TigerMilner Posted December 12, 2012 Report Share Posted December 12, 2012 I always ask for copies of my bloodwork and I keep my own file in case something ever happens and I am in a medical situation where the baselines and trends are relevant. You have to be your own healthcare advocate. [\QUOTE] Also, if a guy says he is undetectable, he will have paperwork to prove it within the past three months. Stay neg as long as you can. Actually, that's not quite accurate. Many doctors as a rule don't provide copies of all paperwork. In my entire life I've never automatically be given copies of test results unless I've requested them. When I do my blood work, every 6 months now, not 3, we go over my results and the paper goes into my file unless I request a copy. So their are going to be plenty of guys without recent paperwork -- though we all probably should. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TigerMilner Posted December 12, 2012 Report Share Posted December 12, 2012 Here is the info from the CDC. Google the study and you will find a number of articles. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21767103 Here is a new Chinese study that says the risk is only reduced by 26%, not 96% as recently reported. Who knows how reliable Chinese trials are? Either way, the research all supports the fact that guys on Antiretroviral therapy with undetectable viral loads are less risky than unmedicated men or men who don't know their status. It's all a risk. How much are you willing to accept is the question? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Matias47 Posted December 13, 2012 Report Share Posted December 13, 2012 I always ask for copies of my bloodwork and I keep my own file in case something ever happens and I am in a medical situation where the baselines and trends are relevant. You have to be your own healthcare advocate. Very sound advice. I like the way you think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Matias47 Posted December 13, 2012 Report Share Posted December 13, 2012 Below is a link to the Chinese study. The article contains more links to Medpage Today and The Lancet. The main difference between the Chinese study, which concludes that anti-viral therapy reduces transnission rates by 26%, and the other studies, which showed a 96% reduction, is that the Chinese study was epidemilogical and the others were tightly controlled lab studies. What we don't know from the articles is how deep they went into the records. For example, the records were divided into only two sections, those on therapy and those not. The first question that comes to mind is how adherant to treatment were those in the treatment group? I wasn't able to discern, even when reading the full Lancet article, that any deeper information was looked for in the records, i.e., beyond adherence issues, were they all undetectable, etc.? But, it's still importand info for non-bug chasers. http://www.aidsmeds.com/articles/Treatment_Prevention_1667_23234.shtml Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
texan77001 Posted December 15, 2012 Report Share Posted December 15, 2012 How long does viral load become detectable if a guy on meds stops taking meds? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CreamDream Posted December 18, 2012 Report Share Posted December 18, 2012 Remember that confounding our results is the phenomenon of resistant individuals, generally of nordic descent. The fellow I'm quoting below is from the UK, so such lineage is highly likely, increasing his odds for being one of the immune few. "I credit the fact that i've taken thousands of poz loads the majority of them undetectable, to the fact that I am still negative myself. There is a risk, of course, but it's something like less than 0.001% according to the Swiss panel. The risk is so small, as to be so close to zero as makes no difference." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scott0882 Posted March 19, 2013 Report Share Posted March 19, 2013 I just check barebacksaunaslut to see what his status after reading this blog. Since this post was started, he is poz. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dpassive32 Posted March 19, 2013 Report Share Posted March 19, 2013 I got fucked recently for about 10 mins by someone who is undetectable and didn't cum in me, what are my chances of being poz I'd rather not be but I knew the risk although was drunk and regretted it, although had a great time and trust the person a lot. I know there is no real statistics regarding precum, just wondering what experiences or stories u have heard? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now