Jump to content

What annoys you most about gay porn.


Recommended Posts

Bottoms who moan repeatedly and loudly in high-pitched shrieks like a woman. Total turnoff.

Tweakers who hide their t dick while getting fucked, especially in a gang bang. Nothing turns me on more than watching frenzied tops using a spun bottom as a human fleshjack. And it's obvious from the bottom's eyes and manner that he's spinning, so why not just show the evidence of total surrender to chems and cock?  

Edited by DeviantLust
fix misspelled words
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, DeviantLust said:

Tweakers who hide their t dick while getting fucked, especially in a gang bang. Nothing turns me on more than watching frenzied tops using a spun bottom as a human fleshjack. And it's obvious from the bottom's eyes and manner that he's spinning, so why not just show the evidence of total surrender to chems and cock?  

To clarify, are gangbang tweaker bottoms a turnoff, or just a turnoff if the edit is obscuring it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, fuzzybttm said:

To clarify, are gangbang tweaker bottoms a turnoff, or just a turnoff if the edit is obscuring it?

Hiding the t dick is a turnoff. Seeing a glassy-eyed bottom's t dick while he's getting used like a sex toy turns me on. But maybe it's just me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ellentonboy said:

Since you mentioned CutlerX I thought I would follow up with something equally as, ah, disturbing.   Cutler was fucking this latin bottom like he always does, and the camera man swings around, and there is blood just leaking out in a very direct stream towards the bedding.  No one bothers to say, hey, we have a problem here.  I am not sure if the bottom was aware, if Cutler himself was aware because from that angle I am not sure he could see, but the camera man sure as hell could see.  They didn't stop, they waited for Cutler to cum, and that was it.

I would have to see it to comment about it in an informed way, but I can imagine several factors contributing to it not bringing a halt when it should have. The first thing that comes to mind to ask is how many people were involved in the producing of it - if it was essentially just a couple of guys including the cameraman, it could have been that the cameraman was in a position where he was being paid to do one thing - capture footage - not to be responsible for the nature if what was being captured. In such a case, if there was no external monitor for the camera, it could have been that the cameraman’s was the only eye in a position to see the blood, and not in a position to respond to it.

If the blood appeared in the sequence immediately leading up to Cutler’s climax, I can also imagine a reluctance, however inexcusable, to interrupt that progression that was going to provide the footage needed to complete the project. I can see such a reluctance being reinforced by the actions if Cutler himself - one of the hallmarks of his performances, and one of the reasons I find watching him so compelling, is that one gets the sense when he is nearing climax of a bull animal whose breeding drive is too powerful to be controlled, and simply has to be endured. Frankly, I’m not sure he can control it himself.

I should think he almost certainly would have been unaware if he were breeding bare and not looking down at the site.

What does strike me as odd is that the view of blood would not have been cut from the final release. Even if it were overlooked in the moment, it absolutely could not have been missed in the aftermath, nor in the editing process.

I only hope that the bottom sought care promptly - significant bleeding must signal damage somewhere, and neither an anal tear, or worse, a bowel perforation, can be left unattended.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, ErosWired said:

I would have to see it to comment about it in an informed way, but I can imagine several factors contributing to it not bringing a halt when it should have. The first thing that comes to mind to ask is how many people were involved in the producing of it - if it was essentially just a couple of guys including the cameraman, it could have been that the cameraman was in a position where he was being paid to do one thing - capture footage - not to be responsible for the nature if what was being captured. In such a case, if there was no external monitor for the camera, it could have been that the cameraman’s was the only eye in a position to see the blood, and not in a position to respond to it.

If the blood appeared in the sequence immediately leading up to Cutler’s climax, I can also imagine a reluctance, however inexcusable, to interrupt that progression that was going to provide the footage needed to complete the project. I can see such a reluctance being reinforced by the actions if Cutler himself - one of the hallmarks of his performances, and one of the reasons I find watching him so compelling, is that one gets the sense when he is nearing climax of a bull animal whose breeding drive is too powerful to be controlled, and simply has to be endured. Frankly, I’m not sure he can control it himself.

I should think he almost certainly would have been unaware if he were breeding bare and not looking down at the site.

What does strike me as odd is that the view of blood would not have been cut from the final release. Even if it were overlooked in the moment, it absolutely could not have been missed in the aftermath, nor in the editing process.

I only hope that the bottom sought care promptly - significant bleeding must signal damage somewhere, and neither an anal tear, or worse, a bowel perforation, can be left unattended.

Thank you for  your response.  Thinking back, this video was older in nature, as Cutler himself was thinner and younger than the Cutler we see today.  The fixtures, bedding, everything I could see in the room led me to believe the video was shot abroad.  It was a part of a collection that actually included Tim Krueger (sp?) of Tim Tales fame, and he too was younger.  The video could easily be 15 years old, or more.   Tim and Cutler were performing in a three way video with a European bottom and I believe this "bleeding video" was lumped in with that one, only Tim was not involved.   Both videos had little theatrical enhancements, not glossy, almost as if they could have been shot within a day or two of each other.  In the three way video Cutler looked iike a really in shape college football player, not the bulkier huge guy we see today. Also, the credits (if there even were any) were minimal at best.  Thanks again for responding.

It was just something I found so upsetting I didn't really want to remember how I stumbled upon it.  Thank you again

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Swallow" vids where the guy receiving the head jerks his load out and maybe 20% of it hits the open mouth of the guy that spent the time to work up to that.  Related are the WS fetish vids where the bulk of it goes everywhere but in the mouth.  

It's all against that very British saying of "does what it says on the tin".

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/26/2022 at 9:43 PM, evilqueerpig said:

Too vanilla....too white.....NO REAL MEN...I could go on!

yes to all the above!!!  and when writers do add characters of color-please make them real people and not just fetishes.  

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LetsPOZBreed said:

"Swallow" vids where the guy receiving the head jerks his load out and maybe 20% of it hits the open mouth of the guy that spent the time to work up to that.  Related are the WS fetish vids where the bulk of it goes everywhere but in the mouth.  

It's all against that very British saying of "does what it says on the tin".

I hate those WS vids, but I understand what they're doing.  I want to see the guy swallow every drop too, but I think we're in the minority.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

BDSM scenes where the sub is clearly not in any kind of pain or distress at all. I know that,  having been there and done it,  that all play controlled and the sub is in no actual danger, but when you are in that space, there is pain and distress,  under the power of the dom. I hate to see the subs just looking like they are waiting for the paycheck. Also, why untie and release them to fuck them. Pointless. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

A new one for me, entire video being POV porn.

Have no issues with the occasional POV when a guy is getting sucked or fucking, but when the whole thing is just POV of the top it's just boring no matter how big the cock is

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

What annoys me most, is when a Top pulls out and shoots his load everywhere but where it belongs !!! 

Attn: Porn Producers / Directors / Videographers / Editors:   I can understand how the first jet of Sperm might be needed to go on the Hole - thus proving to the viewers that the Cock actually shot it's load.  That's an understandable, business-related issue. 

But the second volley, and every subsequent eruption of Sperm belongs inside the Hole, and no where else.  

 

  • Like 3
  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Guidelines. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.