Jump to content

MikeDelRay

New Members
  • Posts

    19
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by MikeDelRay

  1. On 7/11/2022 at 5:19 AM, BootmanLA said:

    Leaving aside "irregardless", which is a double negative and thus essentially

    Wow... you got a great thrill from pretending that those mangled phrases were my own mistakes, rather than me ascribing them to DrDitzyYo who doesnt even know what "projection" means.

    Your whole life was in fact building up to that pitiful moment wasn't it?

    Insulting other peoples' intelligence is a great tactic for you, since it's impossible to do back!

    • Downvote 1
  2. On 7/8/2022 at 2:51 PM, drscorpio said:

    Again you are accusing me of things I have not done or said. That's what projecting means. 

    Nooo. "Projecting" means when you accuse others of exhibiting behaviour that you yourself are doing.

    Christ, you probably think Freud was from Cambodia... fuckin pathetic. 

    He doesnt even know what projecting means, it all makes "sense" now..... JESUS WEPT.

    I bet you're working on a memoir and it's titled "It Is What It Is", right Forrest? Or maybe "Irregardless of All Intensive Purposes, I Could Care Less"

    • Downvote 3
  3. On 7/1/2022 at 6:56 PM, drscorpio said:

    Dude, you are really projecting.

    Haha, that was weak even for you.

    On 7/1/2022 at 6:56 PM, drscorpio said:

    Everything to do with Trump and the Big Lie and the January 6th Attempted Coup are beside the point of the discussion I started about Dobbs and the potential implications of other cases decided on the basis of a right to privacy, and I don't intend to be drawn into that mess. 
     

    No they aren't "besides the point" at all, I was using the way he conducts himself as a judge and applying it to our discussion about future decisions the court might make. You make it clear that you think that logic and recent history are "besides the point" lol.

    When someone asinine is losing the argument they always shout "dats changing the subjeeeeect!". That's a particularly childish thing I've always been hugely annoyed by, especially when my fellow Brits say it. Oh well at least I didnt actually have to *hear* a grown human being squealing that phrase like a 12-year-old.

    Since you call it "The Big Lie" and Trump called it "The Big Steal", how are you any better than him? You use simple rhetoric just like the 'reality TV president' that you claim to despise, yet you aren't any better than him verbally.  And you're terrified of any real debate about it

    People  are of course going to be suspicious about the 2020 outcome because of what an incredibly miserable, pathetic public speaker Joe Biden is. And just what an unappealing old sad white-haired shrivelled old peanut of a human being he is, generally. It's a sick joke.

    But you can't even bear to discuss it and you ban all so-called "conspiracy theories" (i.e. awkward facts you don't want to talk about). You're scared of a real argument, you pretend that someone saying something on the internet is going to cause a "CAPITTUL RYYYYURRT".

    You think capitol rioters are going to burst out of your computer screen but you deny schizophrenia. LOL

    Keep on hiding behind your edit button and your ban button, kidding yourself that you're somehow "winning an argument" fair and square. Laugh out loud.

    • Downvote 2
  4. On 6/24/2022 at 1:05 PM, drscorpio said:

    Thomas explicitly stated that SCOTUS should revisit Griswold (the right to have access to birth control), Lawrence (the right to have sex with the person you choose - it overturned all laws against same-sex activity),

    Clarence Thomas said "they should be revisited".

    What are the actual chances of the cases being revisited, Dr. Scorpio? Someone has to bring an actual case for that to happen. (Remember it was arrogrant "libruls" who couldnt accept one state putting a reasonable restriction on abortion, which led to this decision.)

    Thomas was one of the two justices that accepted Trump had a case in the post-2020 election suit, which to you makes him an "extreme fringe member", right?

    But now suddenly you're pretending he somehow he is in charge of America, and has entire control over everyone's lives, viewing Americans via CCTV and with access to an electric shock button for when we're "naughty". "Liberals" go from smirking about having Trump removed from office, to pretending they are the victims of an never-ending attempted lynching - you make those changes so rapidly and quickly, it has to be called <name of a real mental disorder which has nothing to do with the behavior described deleted>.

    • Like 1
    • Downvote 1
  5. 3 hours ago, phukhole said:

    As a fully-functioning male (whatever THAT means) with a pretty dick, I am almost always guaranteed that they will want my dick.  I'm not bragging.  It's not huge, but it's pretty and dark and uncut and a LOT of guys like that.  I'm beefier than average and most guys would assume I'm a top.  This means, almost without exception, that a guy will want to play with my dick.  Sometimes this is fun, but other times, I don't need (or want) that attention.  I've considered wearing a chastity cage for JUST that reason. Use my hole, that's why I'm there.  I don't want to tell you I'm a bottom. I want you to know and approach me as such.    I've met a lot of people who don't know what they want or are embarrassed to let it be known.  Life is too short to be concerned about that crap.  Seek out what makes you happy and get it.  if it's not your thing, move on.  I, for one, like it, because it lets me know where to focus my attention.

    Wear a jockstrap,. It covers your dick but not your butt.... amazing solution

    • Like 2
    • Upvote 1
  6. Okay thanks for your support guys.

    47 minutes ago, fskn said:

     

    I ignore Grindr profiles with no age, like the plague. It's such a basic detail.

    Yes, a guy who is uncomfortable about his age is generally a bad sign.

    I didnt mind too much, a cumdump is a cumdump as long as he doesnt have all those wrinkles or  white hair, lol. I am in my mid 30s and I put that on my profile to prevent from wasting time

    47 minutes ago, fskn said:

    As for the unerotic atmosphere, that's tolerable if the guy is hot and/or a good fuck, but if he's not, it can be the straw that broke the camel's back. Props to you for being able to get hard and start fucking him in the first place!

    Yeah, when a guy presents his butt to me and gets on his hands and knees it gets me hard no matter what. Its his loss, I dont know what kind of guy douches but doesnt have lube. If you want to advertise yourself as a slut you should be ready for horny tops. 

     

    I wasnt that bothered about it. I was just sharing this crappy experience. If he hadnt been such a pussy I could have waited for his butt to stop hurting then loaded his hole.

    • Like 1
    • Upvote 1
  7. One of the biggest dicks I can remember was a guy from Boston who I met in a bathhouse in London. 

    End of 2019. He was about 25, or maybe younger. Looked college-educated, blond hair, pretty face and and preferred to just jerk off by himself.

    But eventually I managed to get him to let me play around, just before my leaving time. It must have been 9 or 10 inches and fat. I could only suck the top end of it. I blew a huge load over his chest. 

    Also I've seen a 10 or 11 inch redhead guy and sucked his dick in person. His name is David and he was featured in the "Red Hot" ginger calendar series. But I had to share with a crowd of about 12 other horny suckers, and when I found his OnlyFans he isnt fully hard in his videos/pics..

    Americans - does Boston have a lot of hung (white) guys or was it just that guy...?

    • Thanks 1
  8. After talking on Grindr, I went into a 40-something Asian bottom's hotel room. There was some real awkward chat at first cause he was older than his pics looked (should have been ready for that, I guess). And also he had the (British) TV on showing a tacky soap. Thats a shitty excuse for atmosphere.

    Anyway after less than 120 seconds he assumed the position and I was about to enter his hole and he said he didnt have any lube. Dumbass.

    It turns out, I didnt use enough spit, and after about 3 or 4 minutes of pounding, he told me to pull out cause it was "too sore". There was a little bit of blood on my dick (and Im not sure what else, but it wasnt shit)..... when I went into the bathroom to shower off. Then he kinda kept dropping lame "hints" to leave and kept ignoring my chat/conversation. 

    I was surprised because my dick is 6½ only. I guess I was going on autopilot without thinking through sex properly with an unprepared hole.

    Basically, is it his fault for putting me off with his lack of lube and shitty awkwardness?

    • Like 2
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Guidelines. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.