Jump to content

rawpozbtm

Junior Members
  • Posts

    148
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by rawpozbtm

  1. I think my feelings and opinions on nudity are a direct reaction of my childhood. Growing up, nudity was forbidden in both of my parents homes (the fun of being a child of divorce). Having always been the rebel child, I remember thinking by age 13 'this is stupid. I like my body. I like being naked. I like sleeping naked. I like feeling unencumbered by clothes.' So that's when I began sleeping naked. That's when I stopped wearing underwear (and insisted on only wearing button fly jeans so my cock or pubes wouldn't get caught in the zipper, which was a great annoyance to my mother). So, to this day, as soon as I get home from work, I'll strip down naked and stay that way until I have to leave my apt again. I love wearing shorts and flip flops in the summer. I have no problem letting men watch me fuck and breed ass at the bathhouses in Toronto. Do I have self-imposed body issues? You bet I do. Some of it goes back to my teenage years, and some of it has with not meeting the gay standard of 'hot' where I live. With that said, I find being naked very natural.

    When you wear shorts, do you go commando?

  2. The only studio video I've ever seen pissfucking in is Dick Wadd's "Palm Springs Wet Dream (2002)". There are some scenes available on demand at AEBN. And there's a detailed description of the video at gayfistingvideos.tv. I think Scene 2 is the pissfuck.

    There are probably others, but I don't watch a lot of piss videos since they tend to have a lot of fisting in them too and I'm not into watching that onscreen.

    I love Bud especially his piercings and tattoos!!

  3. Rawpozbtm

    Well, there are a lot of people who think Obama IS a socialist! LOL!!!

    You probably wouldn't want FDR...but maybe his Lesbian wife Elenore!

    I wish he was a socialist!! Why wouldn't I want FDR? Obamacare doesn't go far enough, because it should have a public option. Not a better leader?? Who are you comparing him to? George W Bush? Kim Jung Il? Po? Yeah he is a much better leader. FDR and Bill Clinton are my top 2 favorite Presidents.

  4. Again, looking at things solely through the lens of gay politics, it's really hard to say Obama hasn't pushed through pretty much everything he promised to. As far as I'm concerned, the repeal of DADT is huge (that one really affected me, however, since I got kicked out of the military under DADT. Actually went to the recruiters last year to see if they'd let me back in, and they would! But I'd have had to go through basic training again. At 40. Plus, they didn't know I had HIV, so I'd have failed the physical.)

    It's true he hasn't done much on the marriage front, although one could argue about choosing not to defend DOMA in court. But on the other hand, he didn't promise to push for marriage rights either.

    I like both Buddy Roemer (whose big issue is corruption and crony capitalism) and Gary Johnson (who's running basically with a fiscal conservative/social liberal vibe I find very attractive), but let's be realistic here. Neither of them are likely to crack 5% in the general election. They'd legitimately consider it a real accomplishment to get half that. Like it or not, the two party system here in the US is here to stay. You simply will not get third parties big enough to make a difference here or force coalition governments like you see in Western Europe for structural reasons. Although you could argue that our division of powers generally results in de facto coalition governments here in the US (since the Republican control the House right now and the Democrat have the White House and a bit of an upper hand in the Senate).

    I think you are right about Obama here, but I think Obama isn't liberal enough. I would like to have another FDR or even a socialist in the White House.

  5. Here's my problem with Ron Paul: he's not really a libertarian, he's a federalist. What's the difference? Libertarians would like to see the choices on issues like gay marriage (and abortion and other hotbutton social issues) returned to the individual and to private organizations. If you want say you're married to an eggplant, libertarians have no problem with that. Libertarians basically want to render the argument over government recognition of marriage moot by removing all government recognition of marriage, including repealing laws and regulations that provide tax benefits to married couples, social security, health insurance regulations, etc. So, yes, libertarians have a good position on same-sex marriage. They just arrive at it by having (IMO) a pretty bad position on a lot of other things.

    But that's not what Ron Paul's all about. He's been involved with the libertarian movement off and on for decades, but really, he's a federalist. What the difference? Yes, he wants the federal government out of the marriage business. He wants the federal government out of a lot of businesses it's in.

    But Ron Paul doesn't return that power to regulate to the private citizen, the way a libertarian would, he turns it back over to the individual states. This ends up tossing out a lot of federal law that's poised to become very favorable to us. For instance, Ron Paul would permit states to reenact sodomy laws if they wanted to. Right now, the federal government prevents people from being arrested for having sex with someone of the same gender. Ron Paul would hand us back to the tender loving mercies of states like Alabama or Texas.

    So if you're looking at gay rights alone (and I don't suggest you do), you want a candidate who will best push that agenda at the federal level. Ron Paul is not that candidate.

    Absolutely right!! I will vote for Obama, even though I don't like everything he has done.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Guidelines. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.