SubHornyBottom

I feel we at the brink of another HIV outbreak, and this time, the strain is PrEP-resistant...I am so afraid that this new wave could wipe out the whole Gay population...

2 minutes ago, skylon said:

If you read the article you will find there were some very unique and rare factors present with the patient that may allowed him to become infected....With the hundreds of thousands now taking PrEP there are going to always be some instances of infection....This is not a sign of a new mutation going to make PrEP ineffective

That is your un-medically-tested opinion.

4 minutes ago, timfreo said:

Zombie Apocalypse

Yep.

Just now, Pozlover1 said:

You can’t fool mother nature

Yeah 😞  ... I have a feeling that mother nature will put us in hell one way or another...since we as well as other gender noncomformings...are basically defying the nature's law...some kind of darwinism....I don't know...But it sure feels like it. Like...LGBTQ+s are more likely to get HIV and other STDs, more easily murdered, more likely to become homeless and have higher suicidal rates....Is it naturals law to purge the unfit ? ...

......I am worried cases like this will . become more and more and then it's all resistant...And we will back to the fear like we were in the 1980s...

[think before following links] https://www.aidsmap.com/news/nov-2019/how-do-we-deal-apparent-cases-prep-failure

The virus is mutating fast to adjust PrEP...I am afraid that soon PrEP will stop working......

45 minutes ago, dirtyarizona said:

This sounds like a question you should be asking of a gender-studies professor at a local liberal arts college instead of here at a sex forum, IMHO!

But I don't know any gender-studies professor at a local liberal arts college.  I am soliciting constructive advice and suggestions. 

4 minutes ago, dirtyarizona said:

The Human Rights Campaign was basically irrelevant when it was first organized in the 1980s, & it is now a completely tired & utterly irrelevant political force.  The only people who benefit from the Human Rights Campaign are the people who earn their paychecks from them!  I am amazed that people still contribute to this organization --- they are, seriously, grifters!

That's your personal opinion.

Deleted

I am trans and want to take straight cocks. What should I do ?

On 11/27/2019 at 10:00 PM, drscorpio said:

The superdelegate rules have radically changed for 2020. Only 1/3 of superdelegates are allowed to vote their own choice. The other 2/3 must vote as their state did in the primary/caucus. It's not perfect, but it is a great improvement over 2016. 

 

I looked at the HRC website. They say they will only endorse viable candidates. My guess would be that it is too early for them to consider anyone viable. That's just a guess though.  

Yep, they have made huge efforts to improve. Many people just choose not to see it. One more reason for me to be anti-Bernie. He and his cult are dangerous to the LGBTQ+ community.

On 11/25/2019 at 8:00 AM, Versdc said:

Because it will still help some people choose. I don’t expect them to make an endorsement until partway through the primaries, frankly, because there is a split between Buttegieg and Warren, at least from the HRC supporters that I know here in DC. 

It would not surprise me. These two are highly qualified.

On 11/20/2019 at 12:59 PM, MattQueen1 said:

How about "None Of The Above?"

So you will support a Republican ? Shame on you for being a Washingtonian. It's a great blue state.

On 11/20/2019 at 10:27 AM, Versdc said:

HRC has a history of being problematic for more than the most basic of gay white men. That being said, they’ve come a long way in the past couple years (now that they have to). They elected a black man to run the organization, and their Victory Fund has helped elect numerous LGBT politicians including Danica Roem and Kate Brown. That being said, they will probably endorse the most milquetoast option available so their endorsement will make no difference in my mind. 

So if their endorsement will make no difference in your mind...why do they still endorse ? Are they crazy ? 

On 11/21/2019 at 4:35 AM, hungandmean said:

Cute. I'm glad you got a moment to tell the singular, humorless, joke that exists when it comes to the topic of gender and pronouns. 

 

This is not a joke, I am a transwoman. But maybe you don't even consider I am human. So suit yourself https://assets.s3xstatic.com/bz/uploads/emoticons/default_smile.png

On 11/20/2019 at 7:45 PM, Pozlover1 said:

The HRC ratings of corporations allows us us make our own purchase and employment decisions. This is  better than forcing them to hire you when you know they hate us. They still give some of their profit to anti gay organizations, profit you helped them generate. They also institute selective enforcement of company rules to get rid of us, so those laws are less effective than proving ourselves to be a benefit. The HRC  only had the one scandal. If memory serves me right the lad was 17 (legal in the UK where this happened)  and a prostitute not some choir boy. As far as I know the HRC avoids “intersectionalism”, where “if you are gay you have to support these other five or six  left wing causes or we take your gay card”. I can make my own choices thank you. 

But they do endorse right ? 

No wonder gays will be discriminated. The gays can't even united behind the leading LGBT organizations. I think maybe the gays are better off back to 1960s and go through conversion therapy. Let's pray the gay away. I think maybe the gays need to be slapped an HIV epidemic again in the face.  I won't forgive Reagon administration's dismissive attitude towards the HIV epidemic, that's why all republicans should die.

2 hours ago, hungandmean said:

Dude the options here aren't ( Support HRC ) and ( Straight Pride)

I choose option C - support gay organizations that don't have extremely shifty and questionable track records when it comes to the most vulnerable people within our community. 

I am not a dude, stop misgendering me.

3 hours ago, hungandmean said:

They're not a government organization whos funding could be cut and they'd just vanish?? They're a non taxable charity that does a ton of self promotion - and maybe we should ask ourselves as queer people on the fringe of whats acceptable - if we want organizations like the Humans Rights Campaign (That only care about *some* humans rights) being the organization we want speaking for us -- and nominating political candidates? 

 

But sure. They could probably be abolished and it would have ZERO impact on the political climate for gay people. Thats the point. I think you have more faith in them than they deserve. 

And I also think that since you believe HRC is so biased, maybe you can try go to straight pride. see how acceptable they are or how much they care about your rights . [think before following links] https://assets.s3xstatic.com/bz/uploads/emoticons/default_smile.png . Good luck.

3 hours ago, hungandmean said:

They're not a government organization whos funding could be cut and they'd just vanish?? They're a non taxable charity that does a ton of self promotion - and maybe we should ask ourselves as queer people on the fringe of whats acceptable - if we want organizations like the Humans Rights Campaign (That only care about *some* humans rights) being the organization we want speaking for us -- and nominating political candidates? 

 

But sure. They could probably be abolished and it would have ZERO impact on the political climate for gay people. Thats the point. I think you have more faith in them than they deserve. 

Clearly. HRC wouldn't exist without broad support. I believe less than 50% of the gay people hate HRC.

On 11/15/2019 at 4:21 AM, hungandmean said:

In the shortest terms - as a charity they are most interested in serving white gay celebs like Ellen than they worry about the plight of the average under served, underemployed, gay person  and they have absolutely proven that time and time again.

They will endorse someone who won't rock the boat. Because thats what people like Ellen do. 

So, in the way this political climate is going (where laws that protect queers are being repealed) who gives a shit about who they'd endorse because it's all a farce anyways. The HRC is a joke. 

 

So should they be abolished ? 

On 11/11/2019 at 5:29 AM, hungandmean said:

HRC as an organization could be described as the kind of dude who'd post, "No fats, no fems, no asians," on Grindr so it's a solid Pete or Biden for them and i'd encourage you to broaden your political horizon in literally any direction left or right of them because they suck. 

 

 

I don't know what you mean by that. Are you trying to trash Human Rights Campaign ? Guess it's all evil and should be abolished ? 

And sorry, I left 2 out because there aren't enough options. But I don't think Tom Steyer or Julian Castro are going anywhere.

Can't they just endorse one and then I can get behind for 2020 ? I mean it's likely they will endorse a Democrat, right ? Who do you think the Human Rights Campaign will endorse ? (or prefers internally)

On 10/16/2019 at 8:05 AM, ErosWired said:

I’m afraid this is accurate. At this point Trump could be shown on national television at Mar-A-Lago eating a barbecued baby for lunch and his adherents would still support him.

We cannot hope to persuade them. So we must outvote them.

And thank you for that. 

I have no interested in being pozzed. Does 7 days of daily prep will protect me ? Thanks. I am really anxious.