e38dhj9ht89h349h

5 hours ago, BootmanLA said:

Counterpoint: assume, for a moment, that relatively new users could react to, say, 100 posts a day. What you're likely to see, very quickly, is Person A making a post that Person B dislikes, and Person B then creates 5 or 10 throwaway accounts (easy to do with as many web mail services there are out there), and uses each one to downvote 100 of Person A's past posts. In minutes, Person A's online "score" (for lack of a better term) gets trashed.

Most of the restrictions here (not being able to send private messages at first, for instance) are the result of past abuses. 

And nobody's saying you need to use your allocated posts to "downvote" people first, then upvote afterward. In fact, I would think that itself is a sign of someone who's not actively trying to fit himself into the community. If a member finds so many posts objectionable that his first instinct is to downvote far and wide, maybe the site's not a good fit for that member.

Dude, please don't distort it. The site owner said himself that's what he wants. He wants objectionable material to be reported. You can't have your cake and eat it, if you want members to help then you have to give them the tools and means. You have to accept tradeoffs in situations like these because there is no perfect way of managing a forum. As you said it's very easy to create fake accounts and there's a person here who's doing that a lot. They create fake profiles and then uses them to upvote each other. They did this before the restrictions so now this person has a ton of "power" because all of their fake profiles are now considered genuine due to all the fake upvotes they gave themselves. How is that fair? I mean duh. If you want genuine users to help then help them help you. I've said what I had to say and now I'm leaving this post as I have nothing else to add and no time to discuss. Thanks.

6 hours ago, BootmanLA said:

As the owner & moderators have noted before - you get the ability to react (ie rate) more posts by posting more and increasing your level of participation on the site. With 23 posts to your credit (as of your posting above) that's not going to grant you a lot of access just yet.

I understood how the system works. My comment applies to all levels. If I have 23, then if I had to rate 23 posts down that would leave me with zero to rate up, so the way it's set up it will take longer for "good" users to move up as they're not able to be voted up after you used all your allocations to mark down bad posts. If the ratings will be used as a factor to decide then I'm saying the way it's set up now doesn't seem to be the best.

I'd like to be able to rate more. I've spotted profiles are clearly the same person pretending to be different people and it gets really tiring to see long fake stories outside the fantasy section. I don't want to be a moderator but I want to contribute with rating down things that are clearly trash, without wasting my allocation to rate actual good content. Have you thought about it? If someone's using their ratings to mark down, they also lose that to mark good posts up. It shouldn't be that way.

4 hours ago, sluttony said:

Yeah sorry - I meant to add that I can't speak for the US but here in the UK truck stops aren't usually known for their random hookups like that.

Laybyes though - basically places where cars and trucks can pull it for rest, that are beside wooded areas, are where you can find this kind of action (though not at all of them) as well as car parks in wooded areas (ditto - far from all and some are more for the straight doggers).

One of the biggest complaints you see about such places is too many guys just sitting in their cars. Maybe driving around a bit, but on the whole giving no clue they're there to actually score.

For that, you have to get out and walk into the wooded areas. It is usually fairly obvious who is looking for fun.

This is exactly it for the UK.

Mike Pence. And I'm serious.

Ok seems like nobody has the balls to say anything here, trying to just soften it up with "something more serious". Here's the deal, please make an appointment with a professional doctor, you could have bowel cancer right now and you don't want to waste your time asking strangers here. Do that ASAP. I wish you well.

I sucked off the dirty dick of a dom sikh guy. I didn't know it was dirty. When he took it out it smelled strongly, when he saw me backing off he grabbed my hair gave me a strong slap and ordered me to suck it. I obeyed. Gagged a lot he just pushed it down my throat. After his cock was clean he turned me around spat on my hole, fingered it a bit and fucked me raw. Big fat hairy guy with a turban. Gave me a massive pounding. I hurt for a couple of days. Great sex. One of the fucks that contributed to opening my mind and turning me into a slut.

I stopped using condoms when I was 20 and got in a relationship then he fucked me raw only. I cheated on him a lot initially with condoms but one day this arab guy was fucking me and stealthed me then came inside, I was hooked since that day I cheated bareback with as many guys as I could and then would take my loaded ass home, when the partner fucked my hole he would always comment on me being so horny for him because he could feel it was extra wet.... He loved to fuck my pussy like that but had no idea there was any anon cum in there the whole time lol. Being the only one who knew there were multiple loads in my ass made me super hungry so when he pulled out I'd always give him the hungriest ass to mouth BJ and suck all that spunk until his dick was sparkling.

Wow daddy you look amazing and I love to that you are whoring him out, if you were in the UK I'd be your boyfriend