Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 06/25/2022 in Blog Comments

  1. What I’m reading in the scientific literature suggests you’re wrong. The NIH website when discussing breakthrough failures of PrEP says… “Seroconversion was usually atypical or delayed because of significantly suppressed viral load, making diagnosis a clinical challenge.” Meaning taking PrEP after seroconversion has started lowers the viral load and suppresses symptoms. Also if you read up on the use of antibody tests they’re less accurate in that scenario as well because the suppressed viral load delays the formation of antibodies.
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Guidelines. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.