BenniDover

No I think it’s ok. I prefer raw but not everyone does. Plus, I’m not missing out on fucking a hottie for a feeble line in the sand. 

Heart O Chicago motel in Chicago is a great one. Red roof inn in Buckhead (Druid hills) Atlanta Georgia. Got 37 loads in one night at that hotel 🤤 26 loads and HOC. 

Lost count at 450 when I was 25….im 35 now. Lost count and I’m 99.9% sure I’m past 1500 loads put in my ass maybe past 2k. Idk but being a CumDump helps 🥵

Hello names Benni, Coming to Chicago June 22nd (This Saturday) near Edgewater,IL to be a CumDump! No loads refused!!! HMU on Twitter @benni_dover to drop a load! 

Going to be taking my next few loads soon! Coming to Chicago June 22nd (This Saturday) near Edgewater,IL to be a CumDump! No loads refused!!! HMU on Twitter @benni_dover to drop a load! 

Going to be taking my next few loads soon! Coming to Chicago June 22nd (This Saturday) near Edgewater,IL to be a CumDump! No loads refused!!! HMU on Twitter @benni_dover to drop a load! 

On 12/16/2022 at 9:06 AM, rawTOP said:

As I mentioned in my thread about blocking the state of Louisiana - Utah has been blocked for a while now because they've been aggressively anti-porn. Well, one of the Senators from Utah just introduced legislation that will do two things…

1. Require sites with porn to verify the age of visitors.
2. Redefine "obscenity" to include 99% of porn.

You can read about it here: [think before following links] https://www.xbiz.com/news/270761/utah-republican-senator-mike-lee-introduces-bill-to-outlaw-all-porn-nationwide

Age verification (#1) has a whole host of problems. The UK has been trying to figure out how to do it for YEARS and they keep failing. In their case their idea is to have ISPs ban sites that don't comply, but that's becoming more and more impossible technically. Once "Encrypted Hello" matures and is widely deployed it will be almost impossible.

The issue for a site like this one (and my other porn sites) is expense. I'd either have to pay a service to vet every visitor to the site, or I'd have to do it myself. Both are cost prohibitive and the number of visitors who'd jump through the hoops is miniscule so the drop in traffic means less revenue - which makes it even more cost prohibitive. There's no way this site or my porn sites could continue in anything close to their current form if that happened.

But the real problem is that the guy wants to redefine what's "obscene" (#2). Right now only things like scat and blood are clearly obscene. Most porn is just a form of free speech / sexual expression. But his new definition of "obscene" is basically anything that has the primary purpose of giving you a hardon - which means pretty much all porn. If his bill passes it means all porn will need to have some aspect of "artistic merit" or other form of legitimacy. If you ever watched Paul Morris' original "What I Can't See" it's weird because he juxtaposes the blindfolded cumdump with a guy alone in a room jacking off. The compare and contrast between those two extremes made "What I Can't See" somewhat of a documentary - or a kind of editorial on male sexuality. That approach gets around the new definition. The problem is we have decades of content that don't meet the new definition. And distribution of those older videos will become a felony.

As you can see this is FAR beyond the silly, amateurish game of whack-a-mole that UK conservatives are trying to play. This is full-on "American Taliban" or the US version of Iran's Morality Police. It's actually criminalizing porn.

The problem is that the bill is likely to get a lot of Democratic support. Take a moment and read the article in Deseret News about the bills (Deseret News is a well-respected, Mormon-affiliated newspaper) - it's all about "protecting the children". What Democrat is going to pick pornography over protecting children? I mean Kamala Harris co-sponsored FOSTA/SESTA which was a disaster for sexual freedoms and has made the lives of sex workers far more dangerous. The Democrats are better than the Republicans on sexual freedom, but they're not great. So it's actually likely that this bill will get a fair amount of Democratic support.

As a result I won't be surprised if it passes. Then there will be lawsuits. But those will end up at a stridently conservative Supreme Court. This entire thing started because Clarence Thomas asked Congress to redefine obscenity back in 2020. He knew that with a different definition of obscenity he could outlaw porn. So the legal challenges are doomed to failure - all they'll do is delay the inevitable. As stupid and trite as it sounds, outlawing porn will be to men what Dobbs was to women. In some ways it may be worse since porn is part of the daily life of most men - so the effect will be felt constantly.

 

So what happens if it passes? Well, we're all kinda fucked. Presumably the idea of a paysite could still survive. They'd just have PG-13 pics and videos on the tour. BUT will Visa & Mastercard want to process the transactions now that the content has been legally declared "obscene"? Even certain types of piss play can cause sites to lose Visa/Mastercard right now because they might be obscene. If the credit card companies pull out of adult, then you're left with crypto - but it's against the terms of service at places like Coinbase to use their service for porn. Zelle won't be an option since that's organized by banks that don't want to be involved in porn either (even when it's not legally obscene).

Assuming some sort of payment service is available a company like MindGeek (which owns most of the major tube sites including PornHub as well as many paysites including Sean Cody) could possibly survive. They would have their own age check service (they already built it when they thought the UK was going to mandate it), and there would be enough content on their free and paid sites to make it worth the hassle for guys to get verified. But I don't see a viable solution for all the little sites (like mine).

Move to another country? Maybe - but we're talking felony-level offenses and most countries have extradition agreements with the US.

 

This kind of existential threat is why I've come down really hard on right wing comments on this site the last few years. This was sadly predictable and if you voted Republican over the past ~decade you brought us to this point. When Trump got elected I said at the time that the danger was what he would do the courts. Well, it's happened. All I can say is "fuck you if you voted for Trump!" (or you didn't bother to vote).

🤞

I hope it works out for sex workers. It just simply needs to. 

Load count so far this year is prolly 45. I know, I have catching up to do 🤤

Last load was this past weekend. Had 6 but one had a massive dick and made me cream for hours….so it made up for lost loads, this time 

I’ll be in near Edgewater ass up ready to take loads. This Friday afternoon till Saturday morning @benni_dover on Twitter. HMU if you wanna drop a load 🥵

Near Edgewater this weekend looking to get bred deep! 

That’s rape. No matter how you look at it. Drugged and raped. 

benni_dover is user name. always up for a weekend CumDump hotel scene 🥵🤤hmu if you got a room and wanna slut me out 🤤🥵

On 4/16/2024 at 1:36 PM, ellentonboy said:

@ellentonboy - if you do decide to add me let me know you are from BZ.  Nice to add someone who I can look at your profile page so I  have an idea as to what your interests are.  I am open to contacts from all areas of this Forum.

@benni_dover always up for a weekend CumDump hotel scene 🥵🤤