pisstopper

So many options. Hers a few -

1. Piss in him while you're fucking. Don't warn him about it beforehand

2. Tie up his cock and balls and fix them to something stationary behind him. Fuck him like this so that if he tries to pull off he ends up hurting his own nuts

3. Of course there is always the old blindfold him and invite another top over without telling him. Make him take that load anon before you pound another one in him

Even though I do crave cock/cum' date=' there has to be some level of attraction -- physical, intellectual or otherwise for me to breed with a guy. Whether fucking for sport, recreation or expression of affection, I need some sort of minimal connection.[/quote']

I think this is what I'm driving at. I feel there needs to be some kind of connection to make a breeding enjoyable for me. This sport fucks -where I'm just doing it to prove I can or say that I did - are the most unsatisfying most typically

I had an experience tonight that made me wonder - how far are bottoms willing to go to get cum in their hole? I, and several other tops, got solicited today to shoot loads inside this hot muscled hairy Latin stud who was organizing a little sleazy hotel room gang bang for himself. I show up at the time and place per his instructions and enter the room to find I'm the only one there besides him. He is finishing a shower and says hello asking me to wait a moment for him to get ready. He returns and lays flat, face down on the bed with a pillow over his head.

Not another word is said as I mount and breed him in respectable time for this sort of arrangement - probably around 10 minutes total including a little rimming. The unnerving thing is that outside of the hello, he said not one single word. In fact he ignored all of my requests and questions without any sign of acknowledgement (e.g. To get on his knees, how many loads were in hm, etc). He did moan as I fucked and bred him. He didn't object as I lapped at his hole or when I re-entered him to fuck a few minutes more. But he said nothing to encourage me either. I probably could have bred him again but his lack or response outside of a little moaning and moving his ass left me cold, so without another word from him I thanked him and left.

For what wasn't set up as a completely anonymous scene, it got me wondering - did he find me that annoying or unpleasant that he wanted my load but wasn't willing to do anything as minor as repositioning himself to get it? Do bottoms sometimes want loads so bad that they are willing to take anything from anyone anywhere? Even if the top was unpleasant or repulsive? What's the limit you're willing to sink to in order to obtain a load in your hole?

My attitude about whether and when a bottom cums while I'm fucking him depends on the situation. Generally speaking I like to see a bottom get hard and cum while fucking him with as little manual stimulation as possible. However, my bigger concern is the bottom's unloading ruining the overall fuck. If he wants to stop after cumming and I've got more fucking to do I'm gonna be pissed. So I usually work to avoid that and the bottom can deal with it from there as he wants

I'm a longer is better kind of top. I'm with you. I can do a pump n dump in a larger group setting. But if it's one on one, especially if I've traveled somewhere for the breeding, anything under 15 minutes approaches a waste of time. I will usually cum about 15 or 20 minutes into a fuck and can't stand it when bottoms are already demanding a load the minute I get inside them. I sympathize with the need for cum inside your ass. But it's called fucking for a reason. Take it and enjoy the ride. I especially like continuing to fuk a hole after the first load straight through to the second. Simply the best

I just this week fucked a bi guy who just left a 23 yr marriage to a woman weeks ago. His pig cum hungry bottom ways are now in full flower. He took two of my loads and it was intensely hot. The idea of how badly he needs raw cock and how long he's sought it in secret is incredibly hot to me

I have fucked guys in chastity devices - devices that I and others have placed them in. I have tended to like it. Especially if I know that fucking them gets them hard and they want to play with themselves but cannot. I will tend to want to verbally goad them about this while my dick is sliding in and out. If they are humiliated or suffering a bit - all the better.

I agree with the theory that the darker it is, the less likely guys are to use condo a. I think there may be significant regional variance as well. I spent three weeks in Spain recently and the only guys who were down for raw fucks were other American tourists like myself. Locals seemed much more hesitant about going bare. Of course in my last trip to Berlin I didn't see condoms used anywhere hardly

You bet they don't. I can't think of any top I know who wants to use condoms. I know I don't. However I will still fuck a bottom who insists on a condom. Ironically, I do have a bit of a sense of pride when I do given that I can and I hear so many tops complain they can't stay hard with condoms on. I like the bottom to know, condom or not, I'm going to pound the hell out of his fuckhole.

My question is: do I risk coming off as a wimp and tell him he is hurting me? I don't want to risk turning him off. What if a guy who can't handle him would be a turn off? Yes' date=' I realize that the age difference is factoring in as well since I don't want to come off as too old for a young stud. On the other hand, he has been coming back regularly for nearly five years. At least I don't have any visible bruises. Damn I sound pathetic. Reading this back I sound like an abused woman. Damn that is sick. Why can't I give myself the advice I would give any stranger who asked me what to do. [/quote']

I agree with the other commenters here that you must absolutely say something to him about this if you plan on continuing this interaction. He should respond positively and if not you should move on.

But to return to your original question - Why are you even debating this? At the risk of being intrusive - you allude to parts of the answer in your question by saying you sound like a battered woman and raising the issue of the age difference between you.

As a man in my mid 40s I know I repeatedly and unfairly mark my self worth, at the very least in a sexual sense, by how my partners respond to my performance. This is particularly true if I perceive the guy to be younger, hotter, or more connected than I am in some way. I repeatedly catch myself putting up with all kinds of shit from this group of guys because I feel the need to impress them. But in the end this is really about my own feelings of self-worth. If they are pleased with me I'm validated as desirable in my own mind. That's fucked up, but I believe we all do this to greater or lesser extents.

You're a great fuck and a sexually desirable man. Fuck anyone who can't appreciate that. You don't need to put up with unwanted physical pain no matter what you or your partners age may be. Risk turning him off. If he's worthy of fucking you he should respond without hesitation. Even guys who are into aggression or even outright pain as a part of sex don't accept any kind of pain from any other player at anytime. Make it about your enjoyment. We have nothing to prove to anyone except ourselves.

I love to call a bottoms hole a cunt. I'm not as much of a fan of pussy which doesn't really off the tongue in an aggressive way if you ask me.

The word I run into more trouble with is faggot. I love to call a guy faggot when I fuck him as a sign of aggression and to reinforce submission. But I still find understandably this upsets some guys. I hate to talk about it before hand tho and will often just say it in the moment and hope the guy takes it well and responds

I'm a fan of forum runner too for the reasons mentioned above. I feel it's quicker and more economical than going through the browser to access the mobile site and then having to reopen and refresh if I leave and come back there

While I top the great majority of the time (and am pissed when I don't get to in any given hook up) I will flip on occasion. What drives this decision has less to do with the bottom's dick size and more to do with attitude and dynamics

If a bottom gives off an aggressive vibe it may start to make my hole twitch instinctively. I will sometimes use a submissive bottom as a dildo. I like nothing more than taking a "100% bottom", restraining him, getting him hard, and fucking myself on his hard cock against his will. It's the surprise and turn around that's exciting for me rather than cock size

99% of the time tho I'd rather you shut up bend over and take my fuck

The pig and devil emoji are good bets but even they aren't 100% accurate in identifying a bb'er. In the end anything that is broadly known enough to be readily recognized by a viewer runs the risk of exposing the author to both potential fucks as well as unaware friends - the profile app is in fact essentially public space.

I generally find profiles that are focused on hooking up or use words or phrases like "wild" or "up for anything" can top you off. Of course you could always send a pic of your cum sloppy hole in your opening message. That works pretty well in identifying interest as well.

A few months ago I bred a muscular hairy 20 something guy came over for a breeding (he'd repeat this a few more times). I'd filmed him getting fucked that day as I put two loads in him. He left shortly after cleaning up. Several minutes later he texted me a video he'd made in my bathroom secretly after his breeding of him pushing some of my cum out if his ass. I was very surprised and touched he'd gone to all the trouble for the surprise

And if you want alpha volunteers to help try it out count me in ! LOL

But I can't see how infecting a bug chaser with a strain that's thought to be extremely mild makes their situation any worse. Chances are it will make it better. And if they're followed over the years the data can be helpful.

The issue is the "thought to be" part. If the docs giving the shot are wrong about that and the chaser in question ends up having regrets about the real outcome of the decision he made despite all the fair warning - it is, in fact, very different than the same chaser getting an everyday infection in the way millions of other have.

Also the entire scenario begs the question - if the chaser in question really WANTS an infection, why would they want a non-progressing strain or for that matter a vaccine? Doesn't that defeat the purpose of being a chaser?

The Hippocratic Oath is neither binding nor related to any MD's licensure or ability to practice. Things docs lose their license over have nothing to do with the oath which is more if a PR thing than anything else

As for informed consent - this is a very complicated subject on many levels. Who is able to give consent and under what circumstances is wrought with ethical issues. People that are disparate enough for something may agree to anything regardless of how sound the logic behind the intervention in question is. Furthermore there are issues of sampling bias. If everyone who enrolls in your vaccine study is a chaser, it may run the risk of biasing the results of your study if "chasers" as a group share other characteristics that predispose them to respond differently to a vaccine than a much broader population that you hope will benefit from the same intervention. (Not to mention, if you're a chaser why would you want a vaccine anyway)

As for infecting people with "non-progressing strains" as a way to prevent more severe infections - the problem is that by doing so we might find out that those strains aren't as "non-progressing" as we thought or that there are certain people they are far more virulent for than what we thought. Not to mention the issues of mutation and development of strains in populations. Infect enough people over enough time and your non-progressing strain may not stay that way as it gets passed around in real life. Hence why we vaccinate people for Chickenpox as opposed to your and my mother's old "expose all the siblings so they all get it at once" methodology of getting it through a family

I agree pisstopper large bottoms like my self will most likely take any dick just to get fucked because the tops we can find seem to be few and far

I would argue that on various levels this is true of all bottoms regardless of size. Bottoms always seem to be more worried about finding tops than the other way around.

As a (mostly) top and someone who has been larger and smaller physically I do enjoy fucking guys of all sizes. Tho admittedly guys who are not overweight do tend to have an appeal that's hard to ignore. Certainly size is not the only issue that goes into determining which asses are the most desirable. Confidence and attitude go a long, long way to making someone appealing regardless of size.

I will also admit that as I've dropped from 270 lbs to below 200 in the last 18 months it's changed a lot about my attitude for better and worse. I'm less interested in bigger guys than before as skinnier and more built guys have suddenly expressed more interest in me. As that has happened my confidence has exploded which in turn draws many people to me that would never have been interested before.

I also think this issue of size is greater for bottoms than tops. I find most bottoms are far less picky about which cock is in them than tops are about where they're sticking their dick to start with.

I love fucking a round hard ass whether its hairy or not. I will admit that the hairy ass always tempts me to pull out so I can see the fur matted in my cum. Smooth asses always get the loads deposited deep inside. Hairy is also great for eating

I've always been a big believer in open relationships being just that - open. It's the secrets and jealousy that creep in and ruin things. My partner and I have an open relationship and have two of the basic ground rules you both have theoretically adopted. 1) No secrets. As soon as we are living separate existences that only overlap now and then there's too much room to grow apart. We don't always play together, but when he tells me stories of his own independent adventures they can get me just as excited as my own. I would consider his plan to keep something a secret a major violation of trust. That secret is about him holding something over you not about you sharing with one another

2) don't change plans for hook ups. If we've planned something together - a dinner or theater or something, we don't cancel on each other just to fuck around. Us first. Of course on special occasions each of us has graciously offered to bend this rule for the other, but that is always a mutual decision. You're right to be pissed off. Sounds like your ground rules need to be clarified and respected

Two other rules we have - No dating. Fwbs and fbs aside, ongoing interactions with others aren't allowed if one of us must be excluded from all interactions. And finally - we don't ask each other to leave to use our place for hook ups. If we're both home and you wanna play at our place, you play with both of us.

I'm about 50/50. I love the excitement of breeding a guy I've never met before. But the dependability of a regular is hard to ignore when you factor in the risk of a bad lay with a new guy. I'm also surprised by how I'm not usually able to predict the guys who are interested in repeating versus those who vanish from the radar.

Two days ago I bred this hot little leather near. Claimed he'd never taken piss in either end either. So after I dumped a load in him, I pissed as well. Then turned around and ate it out of his ass only to turn around and pass it back to his mouth. Love to pass the cum around

I'm on that cruise as well! And also in the market for piggy bottoms. We should set up a pre-cruise fuck party