Phallarchist

23 hours ago, Sebi23 said:

I was 19 and he was 32...[H]e brought us both drinks and I woke up the next day with a sore ass with dried cum not remembering the night before.

I have no doubt your young virginity was priceless and irresistible. Having been the first man inside you could well be the greatest achievement of his life. It's regrettable that you do not remember how he made you comply or the moment of penetration.

19 hours ago, phillygwm said:

nquestionably, there would be a power imbalance between a slave and whomever was having sex with him.

The power imbalance is the vital core of the sexual act. The male is the invader, destroyer, and colonizer. Cunt, whether slave or whore or spouse, is the ebodiment of surrender.

On 4/20/2025 at 1:17 AM, TallAussieBtm said:

From what I've read, sex between the older male (the erastes) and a younger male (the eromenos) was generally between the thighs rather than anal.

Maybe with the eromenos they abstained, but the rectums of slave boys and prostitutes were easily available.

Herpes, maybe? Go to the doctor.

I fully expect him to grip my skull and forcefuck my throat at least part of the time. I would only kneel for an man with an active and healthy rape instinct, and the strength and will to use it against me.

23 hours ago, 11bi11guy said:

”Dick” generally just doesn’t sound sexual to me, especially on its own. When used to describe a penis, it sounds kinda boring and limp.

I would say the opposite. "Cock" does have a faint connotation of pride, but "dick" is hard and hostile, as a good erection should be. I dick a bitch down. If someone says that I'm a dick, he means that I'm aggressively obnoxious. I don't actually use either word much, but I don't know of any situation where I would prefer "cock".

Natural, of course. Genital mutilation is evil.

I much prefer the vagina esthetically. The way it looks and works during penetration is captivating. Aside from a little prolapsing maybe, an anus does not add much to the visual appeal of copulation. I look at the penis itself, and the boy's face and body. I will generally not watch an ugly boy taking it, but with girls I mostly just want them to not be too distracting, so I can concentrate on the man thrusting in her cunt.

This topic has been discussed previously:

[think before following links] https://breeding.zone/topic/52841-ass-to-mouth/

[think before following links] https://breeding.zone/topic/72429-arse-to-mouth/

[think before following links] https://breeding.zone/topic/9345-atm/

[think before following links] https://breeding.zone/topic/62976-ass-to-mouth/

[think before following links] https://breeding.zone/topic/87308-ass-to-mouth/

On 2/25/2025 at 5:40 AM, partying.hard said:

...if we were in a group...

I feel sure, that circumstance will not arise.

On 2/25/2025 at 5:40 AM, partying.hard said:

...and I heard someone tell you NO

The aim is always to avoid anyone who would. Random group situations are not interesting for this reason among others.

The cunt quality of a choking faggot's throat varies, and more mucous-drool is not always better. However, the use of force is satisfying in itself. It stokes our complementary rape instincts and sets the stage for further exploitation.

It's a minimum requirement. The very idea that an ungrateful faggot would consider disobeying is outrageous.

Yes, they are analogous, which does not mean the same. The male is thrusting to orgasm in something approximating a vagina.

"Cunt"

10 hours ago, londaybaaz said:

Passing out at bar could be done to any person. But why we see the comments only from bottoms that they were fucked unconscious. When it is unvoluntarily, tops should also go through the same. Strange

Do you mean that perpetrating males are not contributing their experiences? I agree, they would be more interesting. They can narrate the whole process from intoxication to ejaculation. But they were not asked in the original question.

It is abomination.

It's a  moral requirement.

13 hours ago, phillygwm said:

From a practical standpoint, the inexperienced guys I've been with didn't do a great job of preparing, shall we say.

There's no question that the preparation needs to be closely supervised and tested. Unfortunately, that's also the case for too many experienced faggots, who are indifferent to the horror of befouling a man and so just do the minimum.

When a real men of high quality needs to fuck, but is left masturbating, the cunt has failed.

22 hours ago, cummimmenow said:

He would put on a Shoulder length Rubber glove lube it up , put his arm as far as he could up it's rectal passage,then pull it in and out several times cleaning the shit out with each stroke, until he could get shoulder deep.

I wondered what rectal cleaning had to do with inseminating. Explained: [think before following links] https://www.selectsires.com/article/ss-blog/2020/11/10/a.i.-technique-in-cattle

On 12/2/2024 at 10:10 PM, londaybaaz said:

Some lads have aversion with sucking cocks in the beginning. How to convince them

It's passing strange they imagine there's a choice involved. Verily, the world is fallen.

This topic has been discussed previously:

[think before following links] https://breeding.zone/topic/52841-ass-to-mouth/

[think before following links] https://breeding.zone/topic/72429-arse-to-mouth/

[think before following links] https://breeding.zone/topic/9345-atm/

[think before following links] https://breeding.zone/topic/62976-ass-to-mouth/

No, kissing is purely preliminary, if it happens at all. The sexual act is completed the moment the male withdraws after ejaculating. All of his seed belongs in the cunt, where he intentionally put it.

Seed will adhere to your oral cavity, so you'll taste it longer, anyway.

Humans don't have oestrus. You don't know when the egg is in position, so unfortunately, you just have to breed all the time.