BlazeJP

Me and my friends experimented early and often. I can't remember thinking anything specific about  it apart from I loved doing it.

On 9/27/2019 at 1:11 AM, NJGB said:

First things first, I DON'T want HIV.

 

 

Don't do it then, simple.

17 hours ago, dirtyarizona said:

It has taken more than 50 years, but the communist/marxist/socialist/"progressive" takeover of the Democrat party has finally happened.

In 1989 the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics was "dissolved," & now, 30 years later, the United Socialist States of America is on the verge of being formed, if the "progressives" have their way!

Of course I am voting to re-elect Donald Trump in 2020!

Socialism failed in the USSR & in Germany & in Italy & in the Scandanavian countries & in Cuba & in Cambodia & in Vietnam & in Venezuela & everywhere else it was tried.

I haven't seen this kind of mass hysteria since Princess Diana lost her life 20+ years ago, & the reason for it is this:  The direction that the Democrat party has been taking in the last 10 or 20 years is so radical & so dangerous that they have to do & say everything they can do to DEFLECT attention from their own totally-un-American agenda. 

Donald Trump is obviously not the threat to democracy that the "progressives" are trying to portray him as, & most Americans are figuring this out!  His approval-rating is actually higher than Obama's at the same point in his presidency!

There's so much here to unpack.

Firstly, which one is it? Is it communist, marxist, socialist or progressive? Because they all mean incredibly different things. I can also promise you that it's not a joint effort from all four camps, because trying to get factions of the left to work together is like trying to make a herd of stray cats perform a magic trick, it ain't happening.

The USSR, East Germany, Cuba, Vietnam and Cambodia never tried socialism, they tried communism. Communism sucks balls. Not in the good way either. It's a shit, unworkable system which rewards corruption. None of the major players in the Democratic Party, not a single one, is anywhere near what could be described as communist.

Venezuela could be argued to have tried to nearest thing to pure socialism, albeit a heavily authoritarian version. Anything authoritarian will naturally also suck balls. 

Italy has never been anywhere near implementing socialism, they're famously right leaning. Fascism and all that?

Scandinavian countries have never tried socialism. They're Democratic Socialists, which is a markedly different thing. And, as it happens, they're all doing rather well. Don't believe the silliness about Sweden, it's an incredibly stable and successful country.

What you think is radical is par for the course almost everywhere else in the world. Some of the Democrats you're concerned about would be called right wing in most of the political world.

Trump isn't a massive threat to democracy, you're right. Those who view him as so are looking at the small term bump rather than the long term movements worldwide. He is dangerous, we've seen that this week, breathing new life into ISIS and turning our backs on the allies which helped us contain them, but there are checks and balances in place to prevent him tearing down institutions. He is also exponentially preferable to Pence, who is genuinely terrifying.

The furthest left candidates standing are Sanders and Warren. They want to give Americans what the rest of the civilised world already has, healthcare for all with nobody going bankrupt over medical bills, a fairer benefit system which actually helps people to help themselves and to narrow the monumental gap between the rich and poor.

I struggle to think how any of those could be seen as a bad thing.

On 9/27/2019 at 2:43 AM, Kayne said:

You gotta be a sociopath to take anon loads in this day and age period  

Well, it's an opinion.

2 hours ago, Uuha said:

sadly, short of blowing up capitol hill when a majority of congress "people" are in session, voting 4 Twumpy 2020 is the only way to support liberty

anti-american filth like Tlaib and Omar who say and do nothing when little girls' clitoris' are chopped off...

Biden woudla been a shoo in had he run in 2016, but now he's just another lame in the field. Making excuses for giving blacks harsher sentences for crack vs cocaine, loving baby-killing Israel at all costs. Warren's tagline is "the corporations" when she's been taking lobbyist money for years and doing nothing ...Sanders is a subhuman commie pretending to be a Dem. Fuck em all

Trump is the only choice, as far as I'm concerned. mor3 campaign promises kept than any other president

I think peak MURICA has to be thinking that centre-left, democratic socialist Bernie Sanders is a communist.

When satire and reality are indistinguishable, we done fucked the world up.

Lads, I came on here to have a wank, this ain't helping.

1 hour ago, RawCunt said:

Wow... a response.   Do they  have internet in the gay internment camps he was going to put you all in.

Shame about the actual internment camps though, which are nightmare fuel for the soul.

I know I shouldn't expect this place to be political analysis central, but Christ alive, does this thread highlight the level of crazy around here.

I'm just waiting for someone to drop a chemtrails reference and I've got Bingo.

It's baffling how under attack some people feel whenever a request is made to them to reflect on something and consider changing their behaviour, especially when it comes to racism. Even with a request as polite and succinct as the one which started the thread.

Numerous great responses from different black posters have explained, in detail, why it is they dislike the term and why its usage can be accurately described as racist. Most didn't even ask that people stop using the term, just state their distaste for it. A Cuban poster also described how he too felt this way about how he is stereotyped sexually thanks to his race. Multiple POC saying similar things regarding their negative experiences regarding racial sexual stereotyping.

To react to that by moaning about "PC culture", for some to even categorise themselves as the victim, it just doesn't make any sense to me. If you're standing on somebody's foot, they'll let you know, you'll step off. You were causing pain, simple action to stop causing pain, pain be gone. Why, when somebody explains that use of a particular word, or phrase, is hurtful, why is the reaction not the same? You stepped off a foot, why not stop using a hurtful term? Even if you think it's a stupid request and their reasoning bad, how does going along with it impact you negatively in any way? A big cock isn't going to feel less satisfying to you because you haven't said the magic words. By dropping the phrase other people's lives would improve, yours would be untouched. It's not just a case of why anybody refuse but why anybody would react as angrily as some have here, it just defies sense. 

Nobody is calling you racist for having used those terms before. Our understanding of racism and how we frame people and groups is constantly evolving and deepening, as such our behaviours change to keep pace. I've used quite a lot of racial sexual terms in the past, never in a maliciously derogatory manner and (outwardly at least) never taken badly. But now that I can see how usage of those terms can upset and belittle those it's aimed at, I won't again. 

We have to start listening when LGBT POC say there's a problem with racism in the LGBT Community. It's not being said for fun, for the drama of it all. This isn't being made up to try and control your life. People are being hurt. Step off their fucking foot already.

Of course it's not.

Some people may find it hot (I do) or enjoy it if it happens to them (I fucking loved it), but let's not bullshit ourselves into pretending it's in any way morally acceptable on any level. 

Where you are, who they are, what you've done with them before, none of that matters. If someone wants safer sex and you then work it so they think it was but you've actually fucked your load up them, that's wrong, there's no way to defend that on a moral basis.

I find it hot, loved it when it happened to me, watched it happen to a stranger in a group fuck and shot a massive load in the lad I was fucking almost instantly. But it's fucking morally wrong.

Either way, in a position where I can look into their eyes as one of us fills the other. Looking into the eyes of someone who's poz and not on meds as they fill you with cum is incredible.

That last post distracted me from what I came in to say;

Luke Hudson's the best looking man in porn today. I would crawl over hot coals to fuck that man.

6 hours ago, Wallow said:

I have to disagree. Homosexuality to  me means attracted to same "Sex" or Males. Men/Gender is a different thing than ones sex, maybe being gay means you can like pussy on men, either way it feels like some "gay" men have entered another closet. The bisexual closet. I am also confused, I thought trans men see themselves as men and would have wanted to be born with penises. So it's very strange to me they would let others penetrate their Vaginas. 

How about people view themselves how they wish. As you're not trans there's no way you could possibly understand what they have gone through or make decisions they do.

That bi-sexual closet comment is also bollocks.

Thought about popping down to this, worth it?

If you could change my username to BareBrumPoz that'd be great, thanks.

I was raped in 1977 - as in the real thing, not knowing if I was going to see the morning and so on. Some twelve years later an ex-partner who fancied himself as a playwright wrote a play about our breakup which included the fictional element of him raping me. I'd read the reviews, knew what to expect and warned my then current partner about it, saying that I wanted to see what the ex had to say about our relationship. All through the performance my current partner kept whispering "did that really happen?" and the answer was always "yes". Until the final scene dealing with the rape which was pure fantasy, though it included details of the 1977 rape that I'd told only to the ex.

Unfortunately he has a distinctive surname which made it easy for me to track him down and arrange a meeting in a bar we both knew. Being the end of the eighties and having an idea about my sex life, he'd expected me to be dead. Had he really wanted to rape me after we split? He said no. Somehow I don't believe him. I gave him hell, rather loudly, for exploiting my life in the way that he had.

Years later I reconnected with his girlfriend (though he identified as gay, he was actually bisexual) and we've resumed our previous relationship as being best buddies (albeit through Facebook). She describes him as having a personality disorder, though she's never been specific as to which one. I know she's had to throw him out of her flat in the past.

All that said, however abhorrent I find actual rape (and I've done more of my share of picking up the pieces on helplines) I think there is a place for fantasy rape: it enables us to act out the fear/power trip of the real thing. Fantasy good, reality bad.

Brilliant post. Sorry about your experience.

If you're in Manchester just pop down to Basement and hang around the dark room. Given and taken so many loads in that place.

Any load is hot, but a knowingly poz load is the hottest. Some sexy fuck pumping load after toxic load in me as he stares into my eyes, fucking heaven.

Nothing is hotter to watch than dad/son porn.

A barely legal sub who's utter filth = perfect

are you the real one?

It is him.

Sent you a message on fb.

Bred, every single fucking time.

Opposite for me, seeing a filthy bottom clean my dirty cock with his mouth sends me into a really aggressive mood. No kissing, but plenty of spit and slaps.