skinster Posted January 22, 2013 Report Posted January 22, 2013 ... Is it really such an onerous requirement to ask a stranger before shoving your dick inside him? I have zero sympathy for Creuzer. Totally agree. Rather dumb situation of a very horny human. The plaintiff has a legally protected right to consent in an activity. Unilateral advance on the part of the top is battery. Creuzer is lucky it wasn't qualified as an aggravated assault with intent to bodily injury - the bottom was asleep. He does not even have to ask or proove anything.
skinster Posted January 22, 2013 Report Posted January 22, 2013 (edited) Damn editing rules. It is not a failure to communicate. What if he was a top? Far fetched hypothetically but we sleep in any position. And you can argue gay rules and customs and personal sex habits and clothing-optional all you want till the cows come home. Police will look at it in the judicially-prescribed easiest and most straight-n-narrow way. They don't need a failure to prove charges publicly recorded for their own stat reports - there is a shitload of paperwork involved, they are not doing it for personal entertainment. Consider random theft situation - you fell asleep on the train. Someone stole your backpack. Is that a larceny or a misunderstanding that you have failed to properly and fully agree to a temporary loan and willingly offer future forfeiture of your posession of your backpack to the thief??? Get the drift. Not-smart moves by both, but the law will protect the plaintiff. Had he been in agreement with said customs, he would have not complained, and cops would have not been involved. Simple as that. Like at the baths. Edited January 22, 2013 by skinster
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now