NSA Sexual exclusivity for staying neg

[Guest DickProvider]

Bareback top, tried and failed to learn to enjoy sex with a condom, safe sex is inferior to a fleshlight, fleshlight is still insufficient.  Still horny for *real* sex but unwilling to get an STI.  The usual options for risk reduction aren’t enough for me.
 

Before I go further—sex is just sex to me, nothing more, not love, not intimacy.  I don’t need an emotional connection to provide dick to someone who wants dick.  I don’t want relationship bullshit with flowers and dinner and externally validating anyone’s daddy issues.  I have, to date, never caught feelings for anyone I’ve fucked.
 

I have reached the conclusion that what I want is sexual exclusivity without emotional attachment, for the sake of disease-free easy barebacking.  I would be willing, for a year at a time, to get tested regularly and forgo sex with anyone other than a designated bottom, also to make my dick available to him at a phone call or text at all hours of day or night if he was willing to provide same.  (Not asking for now, I have some other medical issues I have to address first)

I have tried floating this arrangement on other forums and IRL as a hypothetical to test the waters and received mostly negative responses.  Mainly that sexual exclusivity cannot coexist with emotional detachment.  Which, I am absolutely certain, is horseshit from stupid little boys who can’t tell the difference between feels and dickfeels yet.  I am living proof that it can be done.  
 

I’ve had ONS before, stealthed the condom, can’t do that anymore because it’s a crime.  I have also lied my way through several unwanted LTRs with men whose very existence pissed me off, for the sake of getting bareback sex from them.  LTR and doing lovey boyfriend shit seemed, in the past, to be the only way to snag a neg exclusive bareback bottom for one-man free use.  That’s what 99% of people I asked told me (“If you want that, you gotta because nobody wants sexual exclusivity without feelings”).  It SUCKED.  I hurt people too, by accident not on purpose.  I now have a distaste for lies and manipulation and I am unwilling to maintain a charade of care or fondness to maintain access to an ass that doesn’t insist I wear a rubber.

If someone else were on the market for an arrangement like this one (no strings sexually exclusive mutual free use barebacking,) would they be likely to find a consenting bottom or would they get more of the same tedious responses as everywhere else?

[Cutedelicategay]

There are a lot of bottoms who want the same thing like you do. I have tried monogamous FWB type arrangement in the past but they start with a lot of the same commitments of availability but after a few fucks the arrangement loses the charm. People move on. Your thoughts on STI and barebacking are too backwards for today given the advancement in the medical science. Guys with HIV are mostly undetectable and undergo testing every 3 to 6 months. I would trust someone who is undetectable for their negative STI status over someone who claims to be "clean". Besides most negative guys are on Prep and DoxyPep. Doxy is undergoing clinical trial as Prep. Even Guys on Prep are testes every 3 months as a protocol. Any STIs are caught early on and treated according. Prep is such a powerful medicine that there are only a few breakthrough infections and that too for reasons beyond Prep. Yes you can enjoy drama free sex however asking someone to commit to you itself is contradicting the drama free connection you want. This is my personal opinion having tried such an arrangement in the past. I trust only myself and my health status over someone else's word. For me every person that Dicks me is infected and it is my responsibility to take care of my health. That's why I don't classify myself as a cumdump bottom because I control the cock that breaches my body. 

[Guest Same Dude]

It doesn’t lose its utility for me.  I could do it indefinitely.  
 

PrEP is not an option for me.  Costs money, has side effects, isn’t effective enough, don’t trust the official stats, counterindicated for people with some health conditions.  Undetectable viral loads mean it can’t be transmitted anyway, hence the testing.  Tests don’t lie quite like people.

It’s not a commitment to another person but to one’s own convenience and health.  I would think that is the opposite of drama.  It’s easier and lower effort than going out and convincing people to bareback with you, not being able to demand hard data as proof and relying on trust, luck and a sketchy costly pill to prevent seroconversion.  No offense but the way you handle things sounds like a total chore.