Anal sex with a slave

[SDCumPup]

On 1/3/2026 at 12:48 PM, mark1201 said:

I love my master.

 I have a five-year contract with him. He owns me completely and has access to my bank accounts, computer, and phone.

 But I agreed with him before we started that there would be no anal sex. I'm a virgin and can't tolerate pain. Now he says he has the right to change the agreement.

 I don't know what to do.

If you both entered into a 5 year contract and the original terms of that contract specifically stated that there was to be no anal sex then he is NOT free to alter the contract in any manner during the 5 years without express WRITTEN CONSENT from YOU stating that YOU agree to the changes. That’s how contracts work. If both parties don’t agree to the terms of the contract, then there is no meeting of the minds therefore no contractual agreement. You are free to immediately change all of the access codes to your accounts for banking, social media, etc without consulting him. I would strongly recommend doing so in order to protect yourself and prevent any potential fraud and abuse.

[SDCumPup]

22 hours ago, BreedingTop71 said:

A man is entitled to unload his cum in woman or faggot. Doesn’t matter. He chooses the hole. If you decide not to, BEFORE you leave, shut him out of your accounts. THEN leave. And be more careful next time you want to surrender to a man. Also, anal may not mean pain, that’s just silly. For many bottoms anal is quite pleasurable. 

Absolutely! Make certain that he can’t access your accounts! This will protect you from any potential fraud and abuse just in case!

[PozToxVersPig]

I know that there are plenty of BDSM relationships that don't involve penetrative sex, though examination of this indicates those are more scene-based, not five-years in nature.  Only 13% of all BDSM relationships (non LGBTQ+ as well) state that they rarely or never had penetrative sex.*   
*"Evaluation of Sexual Behavior and Sexual Functions of BDSM Practitioners: A Controlled Study", published in the Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy (available via PubMed Central/PMC as a free full-text article).

We haven't heard from @mark1201 in nearly two weeks, with no real history, I'm going to let this go and assume this was all smoke and no fire.  

It is certainly anyone's right to ask for no anal sex for 5 years as a virgin slave willing to sign a deal like that, though that person is an outlier among outliers among outliers.

There's another thing here that's beguiling - "he owns me completely" coupled with "there would be no anal sex" and his virginity and avoidance of pain.  

If I were to step back in to "mark's" negotiation about this, I'd ask - how did you know you were into this vibe and willing to commit to it for 5 years?  how did you feel so sure that anal sex was painful and that you wouldn't change your mind or evolve in 5 years?  The better contractual term would have been to define his limits at the time of contract signing with a proviso that stated "upon mutual agreement..." they could reconsider any limits based on both their consent.