MuscledHorse

54 minutes ago, Naked4fun said:

Thanks for your response! Does Clubhouse 2 have dark rooms or areas? I know you said they have sauna, steam room, showers and a hot tub, but do they have a dungeon? Or blackout areas?

Should I try to go to both Clubhouse 2 for Cumunion and then head over to 321 Slammer? Or is Slammer better as a "pre-game" for Cumunion? It looks like it would definitely be fun.

They are very different experiences. 321 Slammer is only open Fri Sat and Sun 7pm to 3am (with occasional special events on other days) while CLubhouse2 is open 24-7, 7 days a week. Both are good venues, though outside of CumUnion, baths tend to be more cruisy whereas sexclubs tend to be all about just fucking like animals in heat.  I suggest checking out both establishment's websites. Carry cash for admission and bear in mind 312 Slammer will make you check your cell phone as they (and any other camera type deice) are not allowed beyond the foyer. The sex club also does not have shower facilities and, while CLubhouse2 does have several showers, you will want to come totally prepared and deep cleaned if you are going to bottom.

I've been to CumUnion at Clubhouse 2 on trips to FTL and have enjoyed solid use while there. I also recommend the 321 Slammer sex club. Having Cumunion at a bathhouse that doesn't close only means you may see a higher turnout since the sex continues even though the evet officially ends. Last one i want to there I got some solid breeding use an wound up flip fisting with a guy after the event ended but we kept on having sex. Clubhouse 2 is a smaller venue but still has showers, steam room sauna, hot tub and open sex areas as well as personal rooms (i never get one because i'm an exhibitionist whore)

Most major cities have places that make leather harnesses and can do custom orders (Barking Leather here in Atlanta, Leatherwerks in Fort Lauderdale and Northbound Leather in Palm Springs. Cockeyed Kink may also do customs but I've never asked them)

There's also a BZ chat room  on Telegram

Most I use while taking fists is (actual) poppers. I have been to almost the elbow with some guys and have had two hands in me on more than one occasion. I have taken massive XL hand in me too. Goal for me are to get so stretched out i can take a guy shoulder deep, take 2 hands to mid forearm, prolapse at least a foot out of my slack ass. I would recommend caurion on being high other things as you go deeper into the colon. Most reports of colon perforation involved a guy or guys high on stuff like K or T.

5 hours ago, damsonffpig said:

Hey for sure you could handle it.  If you focus on the results in your mind and not the idea of pain, then you will be fine.  For me I had a gay tattooist who by agreement inked my hole whilst I was in his sling with my legs spread wide,  (at my request) and that in itself gave me an added buzz 😉 

That would be perfect. my ass spread wide and  easily accessible. I can't imagine any other way you could possibly do a ring around the rectum tattoo than being in a sling, legs up an spread...

I have long admired guys with stretched out holes who have been inked. I still remember the first time I saw one. It was in a Fisting video where StudFist had a long and powerful fisting session with Putexib, whose hole had a nice tattoo around it. I've seen them on a number of fellow asspigs since then and would like to get one for my own loose ass gash. I even know the design I want: the swirling effect you see around a black hole. My only concern is the process. I know how uncomfortable it was getting my Lust tattoo on my upper center back when the artist had to go across the vertebr. Ditto that for the tripcep area for the tail of my centaur in heat shoulder piece on my lateral delt.  The ass area is very sensitive and I not sure when you got into the area between the asahole and the nut sack and the area right around the rectum itself, that I would be able to handle it.

4 hours ago, ellentonboy said:

then I guess we don't live in the same area, because I have had black men leave my house when they found out another black man would be attending, and I have had white men openly use the N word when they found out who would be  in attendance of an upcoming house party.

I don't care what you're economical or educational status is, racism is alive and well in all parts of the US.  Plain and simple...

That was not the question. The question posited as the start of this thread was " So, my question to Forum members is, do YOU [my capitals] take into consideration the race of an individual or those attending a group function before YOU [my capitals] make a decision to attend or not?  Certain sites have organized group parties where you can see who has decided to attend.   But what if a friend invites you?  I know most ask for photos, but will the race be the final factor in deciding to attend or not?"

My answer remains unchanged. I do not take race into account and, as with hair color, eye color, hair length, body type, body hair, facial hair, etc., I absolutely do not care what a guy's race is. The only thing I take into consideration is whether or not he's a top (I'm a power bottom).

On 4/21/2022 at 3:18 PM, ellentonboy said:

I have really noticed an increase in the amount of men who turn down sexual opportunities based on race.  When I first started hooking up online there seemed to be little discussion regarding the race of an individual when getting groups together for house parties.  Sure there were questions regarding top/vers/bottom ratios, if the attendees were in shape, age questions, and of course, HIV status.  As the years went by, since say 2004, there was less question about HIV status based on which sites I used.  The use of chemical enhancements was a no brainer as the question was already posted in most profiles (if allowed by the site).

But recently, the issue of race has become the first question out of most attendees mouths.  Who will be there or does their race match mine?   I get a lot of "well I don't have a problem with them, but my partner is uncomfortable".  Or "I have plenty of friends of opposite races, but I only have sex with men that are .....fill in the blank".

So, my question to Forum members is, do you take into consideration the race of an individual or those attending a group function before you make a decision to attend or not?  Certain sites have organized group parties where you can see who has decided to attend.   But what if a friend invites you?  I know most ask for photos, but will the race be the final factor in deciding to attend or not?

Very curious and looking forward to responses.  I am new to the Forum so please forgive me if I am repeating an often asked question but I haven't seen it discussed here much.

 

 

I do not. I have been with males from every race on the planet, multiple times. As long as you have a penis between your legs and want to use it on my mouth and ass, we're good. Bottom line: If you're in a dark room, all you can do is feel the sexual stimulation. If it feels great when you can't see the person, why should it change if you can see them?

The supernatural power I would want to have to to be able to arouse Lust in other males so they would want to have male-on-male sex with me no matter what their normal sexual orientation was. Just to be able to be in a locker room and my very presence spurns other males to Lustful hunger that only I can satisfy. I could get fucked/fisted by whole football teams or fraternity houses. And having no false Xian based shame about my penis or guilt about my sex appetite would mean sex any place and time. I would get hired to do live sex shows (something I want to do in real life in addition to the porn I have regularly done).

On 8/18/2022 at 3:53 PM, ErosWired said:

I am not a practitioner of the philosophy under discussion. Although I am a Christian, I have largely abandoned organized religion in favor of a personal spirituality, an ardent faith in science, and a pursuit of rational thought. To that end, I feel inclined here to rather cheekily play the Devil's Advocate. The critique that follows is not meant as critical of any adherent of the practice, but rather as an opportunity to flesh out and deepen understanding and interpretation.

Let us examine the Nine Satanic Statements from LaVey's Satanic Bible:

1. [Lucifer (name substituted)] represents indulgence, instead of abstinence!

An analysis of the tenets of the philosophy of the movement show that the underlying factor behind most principles is gratification of one's impulses, under the rationale that denial of any natural impulse is a bad and harmful thing. The caveat is usually "with harm to none", but there is little acknowledgment of the inevitable contradiction encountered when two persons' impulses conflict. The philosophy at that point is recursive, falling back upon the self; when in doubt, the self prevails. Note items 4-6.

2. [Lucifer] represents vital existence, instead of spiritual pipe dreams!

The emphasis here is on "vital", interpreted as physical, rather than spiritual. This assumes that a person's spiritual needs are not vital to his well-being, because there is nothing to be spiritual about. Yet the spiritual aspect of human beings is inarguably a vital component of their lives. This movement purports to reject anything that cannot be proven, which dovetails nicely with an emphasis on the physical. But the idea that you cannot prove a negative is untrue: I can hypothesize that oxygen does not exist within a jar on the table. If I apply a spectrometer I can confirm that, indeed, the jar contains no oxygen. Oxygen, however, is physical, and as we interface with the physical, we can test for it.

In the Middle Ages - not so much. Try explaining oxygen to Chaucer. Smoke, vapors, humours, even, fine if he can smell them, but show him a jar full of oxygen and the jar is empty. Take the lid off - still empty. Apply the spectrometer (be prepared to be burned as a sorcerer) - still empty, because you can't see it. The jar could have been full of God as far as he knew, or could prove.

Today? Same. Can you see the Fourth Dimension (Euclidean, not Minkowski)? Nope. And you never will, because your brain isn't wired for it. But it's there. So is the Fifth. Ask most any theoretical physicist or higher mathematician. If you believe in science or math, that is. Because you'll have to take it on faith until further notice, since we can't absolutely prove or disprove it with our senses. Kind of like a deity.

A claim that a deity exists is on an equal footing with a claim that it does not. You either take it on faith, or you don't, but not taking it on faith in the absence of proof isn't science - it's just another form of belief.

3. [Lucifer] represents undefiled wisdom, instead of hypocritical self-deceit!

'The fool doth think he is wise, but the wise man / knows himself to be a fool.'
     - William Shakespeare, As You Like It, Act V, Scene I

I will not defile the wisdom any further than necessary.

4. [Lucifer] represents kindness to those who deserve it, instead of love wasted on ingrates!

The deserving and the ungrateful - as judged by...? In item 6 below, we see the emphasis on personal responsibility, a natural outgrowth of the movement's emphasis on all things gravitating toward the individual self. This responsibility would seem to include judgment of others, and the granting or withholding of favor accordingly. This would at first seem to be in direct contradiction of expressions of tolerance and openness in accepting others' choices to live and love as they wish nonjudgmentally, but by not judging someone negatively, they have de facto judged them positively. They cannot claim neutrality, because they do qualify their acceptance with conditions; ergo, they judge. With the movement's emphasis on the self as the final arbiter of choice, that places the individual in a sort of vigilante position with regard to deciding who's deserving and who's an ingrate, and on what arbitrary terms.

5. [Lucifer] represents vengeance, instead of turning the other cheek!

The claim that this movement derives from a rational foundation, even from a place of Social Darwinism, gets very murky here. Revenge has practical social utility only when designed as a deterrent to future behavior, not as a means to settle a score or obtain justice; yet it appeals to the same impulse regardless of the motivation. In an individual driven by an ethos that holds the gratification of personal impulse as the highest imperative, vengeance is default rather than strategic, and perpetuates cycles of negativity, violence and hate that adversely affect both individuals and societies. This is not a rational philosophy. An eye for an eye leaves everyone blind.

6. [Lucifer represents responsibility to the responsible, instead of concern for psychic vampires!

The individual assigns the responsibility to be responsible to the self, but not necessary responsible to others for the self's actions. Personal judgment again comes into play - any other whose intersection with the individual frustrates the individual's impulse gratification is eligible for negative classification (as, one presumes among a number of choices, psychic vampires). Taking responsibility for fulfilling one's own needs and desires is not necessarily the same thing, or even compatible, with taking responsibility as a member of one's community or society. Hedonists are not, in general, the sort of people who sacrifice their time or deny themselves personal pleasures in order to make sure the hungry are fed or the naked are clothed, when they themselves get nothing out of the arrangement. Moreover, those who assume self-responsibility tend to believe that others should do the same, and take a dim view of anyone who, in their view, is not pulling his own weight. This is consistent with a Social Darwinistic might-is-right, survivial-of-the-fittest view that only the strong deserve to thrive.

7. [Lucifer] represents man as just another animal, sometimes better, more often worse than those that walk on all-fours, who, because of his "divine spiritual and intellectual development," has become the most vicious animal of all!

Much has been made in these posts of the "scientific" and humanistic basis of the movement, but the fact that many adherents to not actually believe in a devil or are actually atheists does not mean the movement is based on science, or that its tenets are simply rational. Rather, science is evoked to rationalize many of its foundational principles, and that is something different. But parse the statement above for its core expression and you get: "[Lucifer] represents man as ... the most vicious animal of all" because of his "intellectual development". Yet the adherents to the movement A) claim to embrace what [Lucifer] represents while at the same time doing it with the intellectual sanction of science.

The point of the statement is that the movement seeks to treat the individual solely as an animal being, beholden only to its biological, physical needs and impulses. This presumes that every impulse one feels is natural, positive, and necessary, and should be indulged. It ignores the reality that there are 8 billion such individuals on the planet all trying to do the same thing simultaneously. It also ignores the reality that it acknowledges, that humans are not merely animals, but have a divine spiritual and intellectual component. While this component may have resulted in some of the worst of man's horrors, it has also resulted in some of the greatest of man's achievements, the most sublime of his arts. It might be argued, indeed, that it is man's baser impulses, rather than his higher, that have wrought more ill. To wit:

8. Sarah Palin represents all of the so-called sins, as they all lead to physical, mental, or emotional gratification!

The movement embraces the Seven Deadly Sins as though they were not called that for a reason. Let's list them:

Pride - dangerously corrupt selfishness, putting one's own desires, urges, wants, and whims before the welfare of others
Greed - an inordinate desire to acquire or possess
Lust - unbridled desire, such as for sex, money, or power
Envy -  a sad or resentful covetousness towards the traits or possessions of someone else
Gluttony - overindulgence and overconsumption of anything to the point of waste
Wrath - uncontrolled feelings of anger, rage, and even hatred, vengeance-seeking
Sloth - a failure to do things that one should do

Each of these may lead to physical, mental or emotional gratification in the moment, but over time or in excess, each is likely to lead the individual to adverse consequences. In this, the movement is short-sighted, and a decision to pursue short-term satisfaction with little regard to the consequences is not rational.

9. Sarah Palin has been the best friend the church has ever had, as he has kept it in business all these years!

Oddly enough, I had been under the impression it was Jesus. But then, the Devil would say that; he's all about envy.

There are number of places Christianity--apart from its dogma that has grown up around the basic ideas--actually agree with Satanism. As with anything, context is important. For instance the reading of the first statement as a call to unbridled hedonism is incorrect (in part because other statements that follow place functional parameters on it. TO truly understand this statement you have to have a solid grasp of Xian history. Thanks to the HIGHLY influential writings of St. Augustine (City of God) and St. Benedict (the Regula) the full dogmatic church view of human life is this: life is a veil of tears, the physical world is tainted by original sin and the only thing worth bothering about in this life is preparing for the next one.  Place this view against the backdrop of the Roman Empire that was rotting from within, where actually gluttony (eating and eating, the vomiting and going to eat some more) were a thing and this the Xian church view not only becomes clear as a reaction ton it, but has certain practical sensibilities to it in an age where things like disease and natural disasters were only attributable to the actions of unseen deities or those practicing magic.

The subsequent church line that became deeply embedded in it was a denial of any earthly pleasures, like sex, in less it occurred under VERY specific conditions, otherwise this same act of copulation was dirty and sinful. LeVey's point here and within others of the statements is to restore a celebration and indulgence in physical Pleasures and living that the churchj denies. Scientifically speaking, sodomy is not unnatural as the Xian dogmatists claim, but their own obsession with abstinence and chastity IS unnatural and occurs nowhere in nature. And, among the mammal animal kingdom, scientific research has found sexual monogamy is the exception, not the rule. Thanks to Xian dogma, the idea of "cheating" exists; a toxic notion that bases the validity of an entire relationship on this one point and has done nothing but ruin otherwise healthy relationships and account for half the country music songs, most of Taylor Swift's output and one VERY angry song by Alanis Morissette.

So no, the opening statement is NOT a call to unbridled hedonism. You still have to be responsible for your actions and own the consequences of what you do and how you treat and interact with others.; you can't put any of this off on an unseen deity's "will." (aka the psychic vampire)

Now to the treatment of others statement: the one you took greatest issue with is really a restatement of the Jesus' famous caution about "casting pearls before swine."  Like teaching a pig to sing, it's a waste of time and annoys the target audience, so don't waste your time and energy where it won't be productive. As for the vengeance statement, there may be an unending forgiveness but there is a line past which you DO need to take a stand for yourself, and when you do, if you're going to spend that energy it's worth making it hurt so that maybe the recipient will think twice before trying those actions again. Unrestrained vengeance is not endorsed here. rather the permission to exact vengeance when it is due, such as I did with a former employer who I tried to raise concerns over safety and staffing versus operational metrics and was ultimately  fired on a fabricated, totally unrelated issue. Yes, vengeance was mine, but I'm a good chess player and prepared for that possible outcome where they did not. 

Point 7, on the human animal is actually accurate, even more so when you remember that Levey was writing this in the 1960's, only 15 years removed from the horrors of the atomic bomb and World War Two. The late, great professor of comparative religion, Joseph Campbell, would tell you that science is essentially a mythology, just like Christianity or Islam or any of the others that have come down the pike. Science performs all the functions of a deity driven mythology in terms of explaining how and why the world around us works the way it does and establishing our place within it. BUT all ideas CAN be misused. With dogmatic Christianity, which is vastly different from what's actually in the gospels or the writings of St. Paul, manipulated those ideas allowing men who desired power to have a way to attain it and hold on to, with full support of the invisible deity.

While science is more open to change as the models are tested, science is NOT immune to those same base human desires that turned things like Christianity and Islam into the dogma defined power structures that they are (something Kevin Smith pokes at in the film "Dogma"). The best example of this point is made in Start Trek 2; The Wrath of Khan when debating the use of the Genesis Project, Mr. Spock tells a horrified Dr. McCoy that the thing itself is not inherently bad or evil but how it is used by the men using it that makes it one or the other. The same sentiment is echoed by Bertolt Brecht in "Galileo" that one day science may cheer a discovery that the rest of the world greets with horror. Brecht is, of course, making a reference to atomic bomb which has just been unleashed on the world at the time he wrote the play. And Edwin Brock echoes it in the nihilistic poem "Five Ways to Kill a Man." Crichton makes this same point in Jurassic Park in the "your scientists were so busy saying 'could we?' they didn't stop to think 'should we?'" speech. SO science is just as susceptible to the baser side of human nature as any other mythology/religion. But under Satanism, it is incumbent upon us to take responsibility for our actions and the decisions we make. The unfortunate truth is that most people want a checklist for heaven that does not exist according to Jesus, but the religious grifters (televangelists, leaders like Jerry Falwell, Sr. and Franklin Graham) are more than happy to provide that checklist as long as you do everything THEY say you should do because God told them what His will is. This is why the Devil is the greatest friend the Xian church has ever had. The power holders shake the Fear Stick--the devil of the moment-- at the masses, the sheep (versus the goats, a common comparison in Xian writing), and they respond en masse, no questions asked.

As for theistic versus non-theistic Satanism, we will never know in this life, which is correct, if either. Bill Mahar, in Religulous, makes the assertion that atheism is just as stupid as unquestioning acceptance of a deity's existence since neither can be proven. Doubt, he says, is humbling, and we should be look at anything with a skeptic's eye because, as he puts it "History is filled with moments where humans have gotten it totally wrong" (as visual examples flash by on the screen).  Personally, the existence of Sataan, the enlightener (Notice the snake as giver of knowledge appears on the medical association's insignia and the apple is associated most closely with the communal source of knowledge, teachers.) or Asmodeous the demon of Lust are irrelevant to me as their existence or not does not change how I approach my life and my interactions with my fellow males and beasts on this planet. If they exist, I am sure they will approve of my centrist rational carnal life. If they don't exist, I'm certain they would approve if they did.

Sorry this is so long, but I felt the points raised need to be addressed in context. This should have been longer but hopefully everyone hasn't fallen asleep or been distracted by a buzzfeed or OMG quiz part way through.

It depends on my mood and the time of year as to what on my body is shaved, legs included. I have light reddish-brown hair over most of my body (just dark hair on my stomach) so most of it doesn't show up on film or in pics, or even in person unless you up close to me. I do love the smooth feeling being shaved offers and it shows the muscles off better, but when I do shave I am inclined to need to use moisturizing lotions a lot more.

Glad you guys like my descriptions and analysis of the belief. As far as my own view of the nontheistic versus theistic takes on Satanism go, it doesn't matter to me if Sataan and Asmodeous are real or not--and this is something Xian and religious I-need-a-checklist-for-heaven fanatics miss about their own belief systems: the existence or not of deities/gods doesn't change the way I live my life. If Sataan and Lust demon Asmodeous are real, then i know they would approve of my embrace of my human life through intellectual development, being responsible for how I treat my body and the decisions I make in my life and my sexual pride and celebration of my male form and embrace of my Beast nature--a balanced, complete life that is at once cerebral and carnal. If they don't exist I still pursue and embody those philosophical ideas and give them prominence in how I live my life because they speak to me as a human male Beast. 

On 8/12/2022 at 11:59 PM, saveloy said:

I'm pretty much a total top, I've no interest in bottoming but I have a total obsession with hollowing out my hole with giant toys.  Just treated myself to a 'XXL Boss Hogg', look it up on xhamster and you'll see the effect it has.  Brutal yet gentle due to the softness.  Any video you watch featuring it results in a seriously, noticeably altered hole, no coming back from it & that's exactly what I'm aiming for.  Permanent, noticeable alteration. 

After playing with big toys for 8 years it's nice to finally see permanent changes, developing a nice, ruined slit & each time I use it it just gets better.  This might be my final size, at least for now but once I get too slack I can see myself buying an XXXL.  I have been mostly playing solo for long sessions, like 18 hour sessions, really hollowing myself out.  A day off afterwards then back again.  Napping with it in.  If you're interested in mutual sessions and like getting bred then I'm interested in hearing from you.  I'm in Glasgow but I travel all over the UK.  Only interested in long sessions with the goal of extreme wrecking and alteration.  If you're a total bottom then that's cool but mutual wrecking is very appealing.  I'm happy to just work on you but if you want to help me make visible, permanent alterations then I'd be up for it.  I've been lurking on this site for 10+ years, this is my first message, happy to share how my tastes have developed & what my goals are.   

Anybody else here that doesn't care that your hole is ruined for conventional tastes?  Anybody else that doesn't really see an end point for how destroyed you want to be?  I've always been told I have a classically 'pretty' arse, nice and round, neat & tidy.  Since I got the XXL Boss Hogg it's noticeably dropped, looks 'saggier' and it only looks full and round like it used to when it's stuffed to the max.  These changes have only just started, I can't stop thinking about how much better my arse is gonna be after every time.  It's an obsession, a deep desire and a promise I've made to myself.  Anyway, if you've got this far, thanks for reading my first submission, I'm interested to hear your replies.

that totally describes me. The looser iam the happier i am. Goal is a mare size mancunt with a minimum foot long prolapse. i stuff my hole with oversize toys nearly everyday and seek out sex that will leave me loose and more ruin. I love how my rectum has started to obviously fall to where it is noticable between my beefy ass cheeks. Vac pumping is helping to pull it out further. i am hosed out everyday so i can indulge in the kind of sodomy i need. And as you can see from my profile pic, I am nice and loose, but i want it bigger, deep and long prolapse.

First time I saw a huge penis when i was a boy. I knew I wanted to feel it fucking me. My 3rd sex partner had a fat 8.5 cock and was impressed at how easy i took him nd tol me i was a natural bottom. That's when I learned that lots of guys can't handle size and that I wanted to see how much i could accommodate. That was amplified the first time I saw porn guys taking massive dildoes and hands. and when the toy or hand was removed, their hole  just hung open like a gaping cavern. I knew instantly i wanted to be that super loose freak of Nature. When I took my fist fist it was an amazing high. the pleasure stimulation is very different from a cock or toy, plus I had the headrush of knowing I had size in me that most guys can't handle.

For a long time I did more cock and huge toy than fist play because i love being bred, especially in group settings. but about 6 or 7 years ago the scale started to tip and now I get fisted way more than I get bred.  I'm still super promiscuous and I still love a good breeding (and some guys have jerked off inside my hole) but nothing hits my pleasure circuits like a guy's fist sliding into my slack ass. I take my big toys most everyday so I stay loose. I  am blessed with a massive sex appetite and that helps control it when I don't have time to hook up and play. Best training for taking a fist is an XL inflatable butt plug from Mr. S Leather. 

I am. It's essentially secular humanism (rational science based) with a nice carnal center to it that embraces  our sexual Nature. All the trappings of the Xian created Satanic Panic of the 1980's-sacrifices, blood drinking, death and violence/destruction obsession--is false and totally fabricated. Unfortunately, because those elements were immediately embraced by heavy metal and rock bands, many have fetishized that as Satanism when it has nothing to do with it. Ditto that for no holds barred hedonists (excessive substance use, bug chasing, etc.) which is also not in keeping with Satanic principles. I recommend reading up on the subject at the ChurchofSatan and The Satanic Temple websites. You will find them very rational based but embracing an encouraging of human sexuality. Feel free to post here or DM any questions.

42 minutes ago, pozpig666 said:

have you got a pic of your other tats, where are you thinking of getting sigil of Asmodeous tattooed on your body, tattoos are a real turn on.

I do but I keep getting file to large rejections.  Still deciding on Asmodeous tattoo location. I wear his sigil on a chain around my neck the way others wear a cross to show their faith.

mine is muscledhosre on any platform that it's not JaredErikson. It describes my gym rat body and what to expect when it comes to my extra fat penis, mare size mancunt and horse-sized sexual appetite. 

It's a good idea but my Next tattoo will be the sigil of Asmodeous. I currently have two Lust themed tattoos on my body:  shoulder piece with a sexually aroused centaur and the (correct) Chinese word for "Lust" with the translation underneath

Every religion has had some sort of afterlife, often where bad people are punished for conduct in this life. Hell is n Xian dogmatic construct. The devil is an amalgamation of several different characters (the serpent (Genesis), fallen angel Lucifer (Isiah), the Sataan (Job) and the Tempter (the gospels). What sets the Judeo-Xian-Muslim and Mormon religions apart from those that came before is their obsessive (and unhealthy) anti-sexual dogmas and obsessions with unnatural ideas like chastity, abstinence and sexual monogamy.

Satanism founded in 1966) is essentially secular humanism with a carnal sex-positive center to it: rational based but celebrating the Natural  human drives for sex. What Xians passed off as Satanism in the Satanic Panic of the 1980's (death, destruction, blood sacrifice, etc.) was made up by Xians and totally false, though many people today have a fetishized form they call Satanism that is based of the Xian ideas and views but has nothing to do with the actual ideas of Satanism. In fact, those Satanic Panic elements are more in line with Xian ideas, especially in the book of Revelation).

From the atheistic founding of Satanism, other pagan ideas were combined to create a theistic version that involved demons (I wear the sigil of Asmodeous, demon of Lust, around my neck).  Demonolgy is a far cry again from how Xian dogma paints it, unless you are getting into the so-called 'black arts' of it that are damaging to others through magik, and ultimately to oneself. Most of it is practical magik for practical needs, not unlike the Xian version that uses saints instead of demons to accomplish essentially the same things.

Speaking as a hypsexual hyper-promiscuous thick cocked bottom: 

There is nothing better than....

seeing a fellow bottom being passed round by a group of guys taking cock in his ass and mouth like a good piece of male sexual livestock til he is left gaping and leaking cum and lube. (love use like this myself)

There is nothing better than...

seeing fellow bottoms so loose and used they can take arm fucking to the elbow (or beyond) like it's a six inch cock. And after the use their hole just hangs open (i can hang open and can take it like that to mid forearm but want more)

There is nothing better than...

seeing a fellow loose bottom taking toys with poppered up ease that would make a mare blush with envy (i am there for most  of those but still have some to conquer)

There is nothing better than...

fellow bottoms so ruined on sodomy their rectums falls out of their assholes showing their dedication to the deep Pleasures of male sodomy (i bloom a huge rose and prolapse a couple inches, but need a guide to teach me how to wreck it so i fall out a foot or more)

On 7/19/2022 at 7:31 PM, Lustofalltrades said:

Ive said it beforw and ill say it again; a proper wrecked mancunt turns me on 100x more than female pussy or anus.

I cannot wait for the day i find a man or sissy with a prolapsed cunt. To milk my cock,  to be bred and have my seed oozing out of its lips for me to suck and drink from

nice wrecked mancunt here but need a skilled coach/trainer to get me to the level of prolapsed ruin I strive for. Nothing hotter to this highly promiscuous cock and fist pig than seeing a guy so sexually used, his rectum falls over a foot out of him, exposing even more pleasure stimulation area for guys to play with.

i am well on my way to that stage of ruin and I love feeling my hole lose an hanging open. I am used to the point now that my asshole is a gash rather than a little round hole at rest and it has started to prolapse from all the constant use from fists and bigger than human toys. When I am at a sex resort I get so used I have to sleep on a towel from all the cum and lube leaking out of my sloppy hole while i sleep. Only to wake up, stumble out of my room and into a sling for more use to start my day of sexual pleasure.  My goals are two hands to the mid forearm (can go to wrist now), and one arm to the shoulder (can get almost to the elbow on smaller guys), and  foot long prolapse (only falls out a couple inches now). I love seeing guys gathered around watching me like a some sexual version of a circus side show freak, getting themselves off watching me take size and use most guys can't begin to.

yes. exercise raises your testosterone levels and that drives your libido. gym rat here, sexually insatiable.

3 hours ago, Sharp-edge said:

Thank u for ur detailed post.

I'm concerned about the infection risk but I think with boiling the tools and proper handling I would be pretty safe. Although I've put catheters on few occasions, I think I'm okay with the glove/careful handling part. I wouldn't be trying electro, although I find this so hot. I'm experienced with surgical procedures so things that break, things that can contaminate, careful handling are things that are always in my mind.

I'm curious about the sensation. How does it feel. And wish I could find someone in Greece that does that. I haven't found a single person who does that.

it feels like you are masturbating your penis from the inside. Put a vibrator against the rod while it's in your penis and the pleasure waves really skyrocket. Just wash yur hands and ise sterile lube and properly clean the sounds after each use and you'll be fine.