nanana

I appreciate that you think the difference is that the mechanisms that tried to get to the underlying truth had integrity and operated in an equivalent manner, and thus that the things that pass as truths have been subjected to the same quality of analysis and introspection. I happen NOT to agree that the underlying facts were investigated with equivalent diligence and that the resulting "truths" are underpinned by the same rigor. I don't think this is unique to partisan Democrats btw, think there are many examples of partisan Republicans giving their own a lighter touch. Not trying to play "GOTCHA" 50latinos and think you are doing a great job of channeling the way a lot of people in the country think about these issues. No wrong answer here, but can you tell me how you interpret two major sources of data here: 1) the Hilary Clinton e-mails of 2016; and 2) the Hunter Biden laptop story suppression of 2020? I have a guess, but I hate to treat people like stereotypes. If you're willing to try a 3rd, how do you interpret Biden's efforts to fire the Attorney-General-equivalent of Ukraine at a time when his son Hunter was on Burisma's board without any experience in the gas/oil industry but with easy access to AF2? (BTW, if I were asking a Republican, I might focus on Obama's decision to bail out the banks, or Trump's decision to bomb Soleimani.) I do not object to Democratic partisanship anymore than I object to Republican partisanship; I object to PARTISANSHIP itself. It corrodes trust in institutions when people see the opposite party misusing the instruments of government to accumulate power, and I think this has happened on both sides. I wonder how we could reverse trend toward tribal partisanship and rebuild some trust. I really do, just not sure it is in our cards, but still hopeful.

I find It very easy to get that people have a wide range of inclinations to be more liberal or more conservative but I find It really hard to deal with people who are willing to criticize others for things their party leaders also do. Most of the Trump-deranged folks on this thread seem to give Biden a complete get-out-of-jail free card for massive corruption in the Biden family milking not companies but the country. I have no problem with holding Trump accountable; what I have a problem with are people who expect accountability for another party but let their party completely off the hook. When you do that, everyone watching you loses confidence in your competence.

Look up Norman Finkelstein ([think before following links] http://www.normanfinkelstein.com); Marjorie Feld ([think before following links] https://jwa.org/blog/author/marjorie-n-feld); Ilana Mercer ([think before following links] https://www.lewrockwell.com/2024/05/ilana-mercer/sad-to-say-but-by-the-numbers-israeli-society-is-systemically-sociopathic/; [think before following links] https://www.ilanamercer.com/biographical/); and Naomi Wolf ([think before following links] https://naomiwolf.substack.com/p/please-calm-down); among many many Jews who hold (but also many Jews who do not hold, as is not unique to Jews but sadly typical of a large segment of the world's tribes) all life as being sacred.

If Joey were a gozpel song, "He has the whole world / in his butt..." Perhaps Andrew Thorne, the fucker-top lawyer, should charter his whore-wife Joey's anus as an LLC sperm bank? Or lay the legal groundwork for blockchain sperm? Or turn Joey's hole into a timeshare conominimum? Or revisit his wedding, where he gave his favorite top clients a 4% discount on Joey's hole (except for the orgasms that occurred at the moment of vassalage? Or should the gangbang bottom governor be filled with "votes" and competed against Lindsay Graham for cheapest whore politician? What of the visit to the penitentiary, where Joey may be the first beneficiary of the new law to authorize gang conjugal visits? Or maybe fuck the mind games and just get Andrew and Joey in a romantic moment where Joey becomes a human condom stretched over his pimp-husband Andrew's massive alpha cokkk? A repeat of Joey's vow of obedience, where Andrew removes all of his rights and gives him a long list of slut responsibilities, "witnessed" by a horny set of groomsmen? Maybe a recounting of their sperm-moon? I'd like to write the next chapter, but still playing the permutations out in my head. Does the next chapter need to push this story into the backroom? Commingle your thoughts with my inspiration my sweet unsafe lads.

If you want a gay presidential candidate, vote for Chase Oliver, the 2024 Libertarian candidate for President ([think before following links] [think before following links] https://www.votechaseoliver.com/about)

I think the best way to handle this diversity of thought is to create a society in which people can live their separate truths in peace and freedom.

While you are welcome to believe “science” there’s massive fraud in science, per this article on Wiley, one of the largest science publishers, as covered by the WSJ ([think before following links] https://www.wsj.com/science/academic-studies-research-paper-mills-journals-publishing-f5a3d4bc) and Australian Broadcasting Corporation: [think before following links] https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-05-21/wiley-hindawi-articles-scandal-broader-crisis-trust-universities/103868662. I tend not to trust people who take establishment claims at face value. anyone who makes claims about “science” as a whole without taking on the substance of the argument is just spouting propaganda and playing trust games.

Very similar for me. After wearing speedos to swim team and watching boys in Birdwell Beach Britches knew it got me excited. I found a pair of nylon tricot shorts in my attic and started rubbing until suddenly my dick was dry spasming and it was too intense to continue. First orgasm, had to wait a bit for puberty.

There are numerous studies as cited by Tess Lawrie and Peter McCulloch. Maybe folks will use a label to demonize them too so they don’t have to think deeply about the argument. Calling people names like right-wing nut job only works in an echo chamber.

There’s too much ad hominem here guys. You know someone isn’t a scientist when they resort to this technique of argument. Some people get their reality from inquiry, others get their reality from believing an authority, regardless of how corrupt it is. Misdesigned tests can certainly discredit a drug and cause overdoses and mistiming so the drug is irrelevant. That doesn’t necessarily mean that well designed protocols using the same drug wouldn’t be highly effective. I say toMAYto you say toMAHto let’s call the whole thing off. If you can’t cite any fact or evidence then at least please consider that there’s room for more than one interpretation.

How does one downvote, upvote, etc?

We were sitting in the waiting area at the Court’s Office of Citizen Services when our number came up and pointed us to booth 3. I was using my lunch hour and was dressed in one of my favorite silk 3-piece suits with a bright red silk bow tie. Joey, my husband of two months, had been running and was in tight shiny green spandex running shorts and a nylon running singlet. He had been resting his hand on my thigh while we waited, and the introvert in me was happy I had chosen trousers with a looser fit than usual, and a dark color. I in my own fashion had three of my fingers deep into his rectum, and the spandex was no concealer, but we both prefer me up in him, so we coped. We both stood up and approached the booth, behind which sat a bulky man in his 50’s. Good afternoon, he said. Good afternoon, I said. My whore wife Joey smiled and folded his hands over his crotch and his useless joke-penis, still making a small bulge in his shorts. My name is Mr. Coles. My name is Andrew Thorne, and this is my husband Joseph Thorne-McArdle. What can I do for the two of you? I would like to sponsor Joey for the rape waiver. Mr. Coles looked up with pointed curiosity and said, gravely, "Since the rape waiver was only passed into law this year, the court has asked me to ensure that it is clearly explained and that a blank form 7493 be filled out in my presence and with my assistance. You do understand that if your application is approved, Joey’s legal right to report rape, accuse others of rape, and to testify in court against his alleged rapists will be terminated?" Of course I understood the law. My law firm had drafted the legislation, and our lobbying subsidiary had "convinced" a majority of our state’s legislators to pass it. While it was clear to the public that false allegations of rape by nymphomaniacs were clogging the courts and besmirching the reputations of men whose only crime was to enjoy planting their seed deep in willing holes, I had my own perverse and joyous reasons for pouring my firm’s energy into the law. As an alpha top, I am wronged and offended every day by every jurisdiction that gives faggots equal rights in the face of my superiority. I built my body to be twice the size of any faggot. My fucker dick never gives me peace and was clearly god-made to inseminate, and Joey is clearly made to be a hole for my and other alphas’ pleasure. As for the rape-waiver law, while the general public embraced the legislation as a chance to slut-shame, I was equally sure that the nymphomaniac population would benefit from this 365-day open season on them that would definitely invite more men to see them as easy prey. Our governor, who had an uncanny ability to keep his political profile and his profile as a submissive ganging bareback power bottom completely separated, ultimately saw the bill’s advantages and very little lubrication was required to get him to sign it into law. Joey looked up at me to get his cue, and after seeing me nod in confirmation, Joey unfolded his hands and put them on his ass and also nodded in confirmation that he was fully aware of what was happening. After Mr. Coles had us fill out our names, addresses and other identification information, he asked us for our marriage license. Now were the marriage vows mutual, or was there a vow of obedience? Joey said, I took a vow to obey my husband in all things. Good boy, I said almost inaudibly to Joey, though Mr. Coles’ smirk made it clear that I was louder than I intended to be. Then your signature will be sufficient as the primary spouse. If you had taken mutual vows, then the testimony of at least ten men or ten positive SAEKs (Sexual Assault Evidence Kits) would have been required to confirm that the subject of the proposed rape waiver, in this case Joey, had voluntarily and indiscriminately opened itself up and in effect become in effect an ungovernable public space. If you have such documentation with you, that would speed up the process. In truth Mr Coles, before I was Joey’s husband, I was (and remain) his pimp. I did assemble ten of his best clients and have brought their completed form 749157 as part of my package. This morning at 5am, I had Joey reach out to his 10 favorite clients (to demonstrate that he was not coerced) for a rapid mass insemination event, one of several situations specifically cited in the law as permissible evidence that a public hole no longer needed nor deserved legal protection from acting on its calling. Mr Coles inspected the supplementary form 749157s and began to enter their ID numbers into the system. I’m just doing a quick check, it’s possible that I could expedite this application if, ah yes, excellent! I see that we have sperm for each of these men on file. Each of them has been registered and confirmed as a witness with court standing. Now Joey, are you willing to submit to a cavity inspection? Joey rubbed his butt through his tight shiny shorts and paused. I put my hand on his butt in encouragement and to see whether any of the sperm forced into his ass before breakfast had crusted. Joey, no need to be shy, I am sure Mr Coles has worked here long enough to know his craft. Actually, said Mr Coles, I only started here when the law went into effect this summer on a work release program from Pineville. I had served 7 of my 10 year sentence for ejaculating in a supposedly unwilling slut. No way that slut was unwilling, he had a very cummy hole before I ever entered it let alone contributed. I have to say, I knew who you were when you walked in Mr Thorpe. I wrote to you from prison when I read about what you were doing, and I am very appreciative that you added the work-release amendment to the law. I laughed, not having made the connection before now, but vividly remembered his letter. That letter had been critical to my ability to convince many of the legislators. It was one of my best illustrations of the principle that while rape law is critical for helping protect the honor of chaste and honorable vulnerable women and passive men in our society, that there truly is a type of whore who is so sexually driven to crave dicks, that the rape law is only a weapon against men who give them exactly what they crave. Now, Joey, since you have agreed to a cavity search, the last thing for me to ask you before I conduct the procedure is to get a verbal confirmation that the cavity search would provide forensic support for your husband’s application. Joey, torn between a desire to appear modest and a greater desire to be freed from expectations of honor that were impossible for him to meet, blushed and said, I can confirm that I goaded 10 men into releasing their sperm into my anus this morning and that I used a butt plug to ensure minimal leakage. I could feel this batter bounce around inside of me on my run this morning. I am prepared to remove the butt plug and squirt out the necessary evidence. Mr Coles said, do you consent to being filmed during the procedure? The more I can substantiate the evidence, the more quickly I can add you to the rape waiver database, perhaps even before you leave. He will obey your request. Any objection to me filming the test with my cell phone? I’d like to live broadcast it to my clientele and also have a personal memo of today. That is PERFECTLY fine with me, laughed Mr Coles. After the cameras were in place, I pulled over a seat, pulled Joeys butt up over my lap, and removed his shorts and butt plug. Mr Coles picked up the testing instrument, inserted it slowly into Joey’s anus, stirred it around, and then placed it in the reader. Mr Thorne, we have about five minutes before the test is complete. Do you mind if I show Joey my office? I don’t expect to take long. I smiled and said Not at all. I need to make a few phone calls. As I saw Joey and Mr Coles turn the corner, I could tell that Joey was already stroking Mr Coles and Mr Coles was guiding Joey via his hand on Joey’s cum-logged shorts. I had commissioned a bespoke present for Joey as a celebration for his new status as unrapable - Code UR. A tanner I knew had taken measurements for a new device that was half harness/half sling. While it was perfectly fitted to Joey, Joey could be harnessed to the front of any man such that Joey’s body would be against the man’s chest and his ass would be positioned perfectly to contain the man’s cock. I was very happy when the tanner said it was ready for pickup. I then called the Pineville warden and asked him whether the rape unit was ready for their special visitor. I knew in my dick that my little bitch was going to successfully complete the process. Warden Jezz confirmed that he had effected our plans, discussed while my little Joey was running the baby batter into a lather. As I finished my call, I could see Mr. Coles popping Joey’s shorts back up over his butt as they rounded the corner, wet stains on Mr Coles’ crotch and Joey’s already soaked shorts. The timer went off on the testing device. Mr Coles loaded the results to the computer, and the computer screen showed the pictures of the ten men who had banged loads into him in our garden this morning before breakfast. An additional three men, all policemen, were also pictured. Joey blushed and said that he had stopped in the men’s bathroom at the park during his run. The evidence substantiated, and Mr Coles having not only tested but gotten a live demonstration of Joey’s hopeless degeneration in Mr Coles office, Mr Coles asked how I would like to have Joey registered. I selected the publicly searchable database on the agency website, and I also selected a chip inserted right under UR QR code tattoo right over his coccyx. That would come later. Mr Coles stamped the application as being approved, and Joey was ushered to the court, where the judge promptly removed his rights to be a party to any court actions concerning allegations of rape.

Suprised this didn't already cum up, but def into men into spandex, nylon (not ladies nylons, though I know that is also a fetish that excites many), mainly athletic gear but also masculine satin and silk mens attire, love my 100% silk dolce and gabbana silk suit, love to see men in satin suits, taffeta nylon soccer shorts, spandex bike shorts, singlets, etc. Very excited to replace all my natural fabric clothes with pure silk and 100% unnatural nylon/spandex/acetate fabrics. And love the idea of a spandex or nylon condom that doesn't really keep any spunk out of any hungry hole.

There is a science of compensation that is totally missing from this analysis. So many scientists are dependent upon grants, corporations and other large sources of income for their research. Without looking at compensation, there is no reason to assume that science rather than compensation is what they’re motivated by.

But trust doesn’t really apply to science, which is about relentless questioning of the current understanding, expansion of the fact base, competition of hypotheses, and ignoring the mediocrity of consensus when a better understanding is achieved.

Would you mind sharing references?

Since this community doesn’t like safe sex but likes safe brain I’ll just let it be a question… happy safe-brain but not safe-ass Friday! Especially to the homosexual American Whores a la Lana Del Rey

I agree with your point here BootmanLA. It is unfortunate that time and space force one to take shortcuts in crafting a message. Thanks for manifesting the diversity there.

My other challenge with liberals is that they take the assertions of bureaucrats at face value. A lot of the values espoused are great. But there is less effort to understand whether it was talk or walk. Peace all. We may not agree but I’m happy we share the same planet.

I bet You cannot honestly say you read him. So many citations in his book. Please let me know if I’m wrong.

Hi Viking8x6, I don’t take issue with your point about injustice and whether “taking” is justified. My point was that a mentality of abundance doesn’t come from wealth, but instead creates wealth. It comes from an ability to value what others do not value. “Taking” may be “justified” but doesn’t add to the wealth of the planet, just moves it around. I distrust the motivation to fight over a limited resource and trust a motivation to conceive of new value and expand the pie. Poor leaders just redistribute. Great leaders show people their own power to self-generate. I think NEDenver’s point about whether the word “triggered” is offensive is a perfect illustration of the differing starting points of the current evolution of woke versus non-woke. A woke take on the world would start with whether a statement was “offensive” or not. A non-woke take would start with whether a word was a good expression of an empirical experience. Since I have witnessed people being triggered, including myself, I see a value in capturing and expressing the truth. For me, this is another challenge I have with the woke mindset. It starts with the premise that other people should think your fantasies are more important than their truth. I’m willing to coexist with your fantasies, but I’m not willing to have my truth obliterated. The seeming desire to obliterate empirical experience makes me think that a woke approach will insulate me from the reality and diversity of thought required to hone the quality of argumentation beyond ad hominem snark, which thickens this thread. I’m sure the guys chiming in here are great guys who wouldn’t need to tear down others to come into their own glory, the kinds who would even deign to help anyone with a subarctic IQ find their greatness 🙂.

To be clear, it is the inability to hear without being triggered that comes across as mental illness, NOT the lovely woke idea that all of Gods children are miracles.

I wouldn’t say I’m conservative but definitely less liberal than I used to be. The aspects of the current version of woke that don’t appeal to me are the unfocused victimhood of it. I’d distinguish that from focused victimhood. If an actual person hits me for example, I’m actually a victim of that persons violence. If there’s merely a premise that I look like someone or are otherwise part of a class of people that might have victimized someone or a distant relative, then that drifts toward collective punishment and creates a toxic culture that encourages people to assume the worst in each other. It gets tiresome to talk about all the things you can’t control, and there’s something insidious about this creeping prejudice. I think It is great to “fight” for justice but even better to lift everyone up to discover their own power to create their own heaven. I often find the current version of woke to be more about taking something from another class of people rather than a mentality of abundance. HOWEVER, like everything else, this version of woke is probably at least partially a parody of how liberals actually think and emphasizes the worst and most objectionable qualities of their intentions like most issues that get hollowed out by incessant partisanship. Still, I have been around enough liberals who just launch into tirades about people for whom they have no genuine curiosity that “woke” has become a mostly unpleasant exercise in stereotyping and having thought be shut down and narrowed. I look forward to a day in which individuals are more valued and listening and exchanging unique original thought without triggers is more cultivated.

Let’s all get knocked up and have our butt babies on Inauguration Day. Just to prove we at least have timing down pat.

Unfortunately, most districts are lopsided, regardless of gerrymandering, and not terribly competitive. Swing states have that distinction because competition matters. If you are a blue in a red state or a red in a blue state, you have to live vicariously.