nanana

Dear White People, You are aware that ANYONE can edit Wikipedia, which is a HIGHLY DYNAMIC single source of truth no? Of course truth changes from ruler to ruler or from profit motive to profit motive. I appreciate our dear enabler RawTop and his wishes that only truth reign. I leave you with only questions rather than anything that could be construed as misinformation. 1) have all scientific insights already been had that the only thing left to do is to agree with all sources of past scientific insight and maybe even declare the end of inquiry? 2) can you, dear censors, think of a time in the past when one predominant interpretation of facts was replaced by a new prevailing interpretation of facts, perhaps the moment that Salem abandoned its scientific tests for witches? 3) from a personal perspective, what do you get out of shutting down diversity of thought? 4) do you remember when homos were the champions of fresh perspective and non-conformity? 5) have you ever PERSONALLY reinterpreted data? 6) what was Albert Einstein’s job when he wrote his papers on Brownian motion, specific relativity, general relativity, etc. and would you count his profession as providing him sufficient certifications for his insights? 7) were Copernicus and Galileo “misinformation spreaders” or are they sufficiently celebrated by the writers of Wikipedia to have homo street-cred? 8 ) have you ever witnessed two people you admire having a formidable debate? 9) Have you heard of an Overton Window? 10) given the number of times per day that you hear things you may disagree with, what % of daily disagreements is your banning and censorship regime addressing? 11) when one acknowledges an infraction, do you picture that the infractor has conformed his thinking? 12) what secret nonconformist thoughts do you have that you are smart enough not to express on this great site? 13) on a scale of 1 - 10, how manly would you rate a conformist? 14) how deeply is it necessary to go to understand uniquely-understood truths: Wikipedia-level depth or many-perspectives depth? 15) how BAD is it to be wrong, intellectually unpopular, or to have evidence of truths that the vast majority of homos simply lack, being highly reliant upon tailored sources of information subsidized by the profiteers? 16) did you ever see the play/movie with Meryl Streep as the nun with “Doubt”? 17) do you think you have access to all facts? 18) do you think all existing facts support your opinions, or might some facts support alternate opinions? 19) is there only black and white in your mental model or is there gray? 20) in your way of thinking, do liars exist and is it possible that they were motivated to write for Wikipedia? 21) is it true or false for you that lairs are at least sometimes motivated by the profit motive? 22) is it true or false for you that liars are likely to dress like truth-tellers, maybe even priests (or lab workers)? 23) have you ever been forgiven for making a mistake and either way how did that affect your interest in the forgiver’s perspective? 24) how many times have you made fun of “fascist” Italy or the Stalinist “Soviet Union” or the anti-homosexual Hollywood Hayes Code, and if so how much time have you spent exploring your blind spots? 25) it is said that scientific revolutions only occur when old scientists die: do you feel this is a reasonable insight or one that if expressed by a fellow bareback homo should be banned? very respectfully but stimulated highly by your future answers (wishing for myself an intense brain erection)

How are the right-leaning guys here feeling about Trumps first few days in office? Any great things and any concerns? Thought I’d resurrect this thread since there are very few non-Democrat or non-leftist voices in the other threads. I don’t begrudge any demoleftists their opinions but looking for less than knock-down drag-out exchange. as for me: happy about potential end of Kowtowing to Eurosocialist-dominated EU and NATO moochers, happy about full frontal attack on censorship and USAID-style corruption and Samantha Power-style self-enrichment but worry about precedents set for future administrations, excited by shrinking of government hopeful about debt reduction and 50% reduction in military in favor of Fortress America, wandering if the necessary speed of Apple-cart overturning may break economy but think it may be necessary to reindustrialize, definancialize and tip balance for workers and Main Street. Will deep state find a poison pill? Will the vipers of lawfare throw darts? I hope Other countries interpret his first few days as needed tough love and rise up rather than being offended by Trumps admittedly in-your-face style. What say you ex-Democrats, you righteous independents, you RINOs you libertarians, you MAGA lads and you free-thinker non-partisans with a less-than reductionistic worldview?

True that!

I am very happy to see the Trump administration make a concerted effort to shrink government and regulation, reduce bureaucratic headcount and federal contract spending, root out the massive corruption and excessive government expenditure in USAID/HHS/DOJ/etc among other places, move to end the Ukraine war, fight censorship in America and call out the destruction of democracy in Europe, and instill some (slight) hope for a just peace for the Middle East, though the Gaza Own It thing is hopefully another thing that cannot be taken at face value. It would be great if he really could work with Xi and Vlad to cut military expenditure by 50%, though I noticed Vance walked it back a bit. It would be great if the DOGE could audit all of the unauditable unaccountable agencies like the DOD and the Fed. I was originally less concerned about the DOGE, but I do have concerns about the privacy of information. I do feel for the trans community and can understand how my bareback bros might worry about it as a portend of things to come for homos. Definitely have to watch the retreat of individual freedoms, even while freedom to operate in groups may be changed. (I don't expect many to agree with me on my optimism, but hopefully agreement is not the only thing worth communicating.) No beef with the RINO/Democratic voters, but I hope the corrupt RINO/DEMOcrats remain stunned as their theft of Americans' hard earned tax dollars and their intervention in the world's free nations gets upended. I maintain a healthy suspicion of Trump and think a high level of engagement and opinion sharing will be necessary throughout the next four years.

Time to get rid of the treaty.

I love your response brnbk 🙂 I never mind corrections or additions and generally think the best knowledge base is cumulative. I think a lot of our knowledge base has been corrupted by the profit motive. One of the hardest things to do is to unwind the knowledge base implanted to you as a kid. I agree you that there may be many factors to consider. My only request to all here is to think about WHY you think what you do. How much are you just repeating what you heard and how much are you examining evidence? Who benefited by convincing you to espouse a view? How much have you considered the compensation of your sources. If we can have that exchange I’m def up for it.

Why do you think Pfizer has paid BILLIONs in criminal liabilities?

People frequently overweight the value of vaccination and underweight the value of elimination of poisonous agricultural chemicals (real cause of polio), sanitation of running water and elimination of horseshit from streets, etc., which have a much greater correlation to ending disease than vaccines. Read sweet people read. Then think.

Hopefully RFK Jr can make it through the nomination process to clean out the conformist-and-Fauci-corruption-driven system to find real solutions for chronic health issues rather than just another round of fraudulent boondoggles. One can hope.

That’s what I’m worried about.

As someone who has gotten old enough not to worry about what others think, I have grown much more tolerant of views less than adoring of homos, but I can still channel my inner child who would wilt at any resistance to my fragile handle on acceptance/approval/community and take my measure of success from an unrealistic vision of complete tolerance for buggers. I hate the idea that gay kids might feel suicidal over the silly gods children like Anita. Let’s make sure our insecure pre-teen faggots have some people in their lives reducing the power of the Anitas and helping them enjoy their unacceptable beauty and uniqueness.

And yet this was after 100s of successful efforts to rebalance the number of voters in state districts by the Democrats (to their credit, it was a good thing to do not to let the value of an individuals vote be equitable) but with the result that Trump increased his vote count in even “rebalanced” districts.

It also sounds as if you may be having a super bad day. Breathe, smile, love. That may be the hardest thing to do, but I wish you peace and connection.

That’s super creepy. I hope you figure out how to share the planet.

Hedonism is compelling but tunes out some other great values such as enjoying the unattractive, using your full-brain consciousness, and non-sensual connections to other people. Has anyone else had moments when they wished to transcend the gay gift box?

your dick looks much better not scraped up by bottoms gone nuts... lol maybe some municipality will pass a law that bottoms are no longer allowed to eat popcorn unless by explicit permission of some fucker who likes exfoliants lol. maybe Uganda will finally legalize sodomy. perhaps Gretha Thunberg will come out... what other happy occurrences are wished in the new year of politique?

Greetings all: It's never a bad time to be hopeful. What local, state, national and international developments are you most hopeful about? Happy Holidays!

I agree with you PozBearWI. Talking can lead to breakthroughs in understanding. I’m also appreciative that there’s a fine line between a right and a privilege, with one frequently confused for another. I am fond of rights for all but often find privileges less defensible. I am sure that many non-gays are sensitive to what may seem like gay privileges OR to incursions on their rights to live the lives they want to live. I am also sensitive to this AND thick skinned. There’s room for us all, from the sluttiest whore to the most righteous Muslim, if we just figure out the right balance between public and private spaces and how to treat each other without violence in the shared public sphere.

This is just a paraphrase translation: “The first human who hurled an insult instead of a stone invented civilization.” - Sigmund Freud. Perhaps we have a different appreciation for our intellectual heritage.

This may seem counterintuitive but there’s a balance of peace between tribes when they talk about each other behind their backs to blow off the steam of not being in a trust-and-understanding tribe, which makes for healthy coexistence. I think coexistence is about the best our Homo sapiens can aspire to. The caveman who put down his club and started swearing is the caveman who invented civilization. While it’s true that evil triumphs when good men do nothing it’s also true that giving people no space to voice potentially offensive thoughts leaves them with no other tools but violent tools to oppose threats to their autonomy. We are not so thin skinned are we? People having bad day. I found Someone who listened to me in a puny moment rather than judged me. Jonah was discovered in a whale. Live reins down while people (men) go through anger. on the other hand I get Hard when alpha/omegas acknowledge the hierarchy. I might Be destined to fill up a faggot that is hierarchically beneath me. Or I might be destined to be a fucktoy for a superior alpha. Both are good. The alpha/faggot thing is difficult to stuff into a democracy closet. @BootmanLA the only things we really know about you are that you have a formidable command of MSM facts, an ability to ensure that the left-of-center is well represented (thank you for giving voice to a less-than-loquacious majority on this fagsitw) an asshole that we all want to name the Capitol (from your beautiful pixels), and an argumentation that makes us choose democracy or hierarchy. Perhaps we should all be hole-less and dick-less and just be too kind to fuck. So many beautiful contradiicktions on the planet. I’ve seen a triple fuck but want to see or feel a quadruple fuck before AI takes over.

Bonus for your parents or younger siblings’ funerals (could be rites of burial or celebrations) bonus is not the right word don’t seek my approval just seek my sperm hole or my (if you believe in HIV) death dick.

In the job interview you cum sewer. I now want to hire you to take cum during your zoom job interviews maybe right on your eyelashes as you’re accepting the salary.

Greetings Guys, Curious to know how much of your day / night you are hard? Is it pretty consistent, or does it vary, and by what variables? Looking forward to stimulating responses.

I'd argue that the level of detail be it kingdom, order, or species, should probably be "fit for purpose." If we are looking for broad loving acceptance, give me a kingdom. If we are looking for a more specific purpose, e.g., to fuck cum into a bareback bottom or absorb cum from a fucker-mate, then maybe not even the species level is sufficiently specific. It is perfectly reasonable, and unhateful, to specify a level in the heirarchy that is "fit for purpose."

A bonus for anyone who can elucidate how this advances their most verbalized and repeated values…