Jump to content

nanana

Members
  • Posts

    346
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by nanana

  1. Greetings Guys, Curious to know how much of your day / night you are hard? Is it pretty consistent, or does it vary, and by what variables? Looking forward to stimulating responses.
  2. I'd argue that the level of detail be it kingdom, order, or species, should probably be "fit for purpose." If we are looking for broad loving acceptance, give me a kingdom. If we are looking for a more specific purpose, e.g., to fuck cum into a bareback bottom or absorb cum from a fucker-mate, then maybe not even the species level is sufficiently specific. It is perfectly reasonable, and unhateful, to specify a level in the heirarchy that is "fit for purpose."
  3. A bonus for anyone who can elucidate how this advances their most verbalized and repeated values…
  4. Thanks to a cool head that was not my own, I cordially invite any Democrats to make the arguments for the big man to offer a pardon.
  5. You have last word
  6. No you didn’t get my point. I’m not saying justice isn’t good. I’m saying it gets harder and harder to administer the more removed it gets.
  7. The people who can be definitively linked to an immoral act. It’s not good enough to say they “look” similar or were “born” into it. Children have no control over their circumstances, and the world is never going to be “fair.” Economic winners are always going to do something that pisses off others. As I said before, I am HIGHLY in favor of people and groups who feel that what they inherited was affected by past injustice to do something about it. However, there are two examples at different extremes of this and many examples in the middle of them: 1) build the capabilities to have the life you want; and 2) focus on taking away things from others that have been poorly distributed by past injustices. As I said there are reasons to do both, but I think the second path is likely to be less effective the farther it is in time, especially generationally, from the injustice. Also, the more unfocused the remedy is on the ACTUAL PEOPLE who did it. The wider the net especially to people who had no originating role in the injustice, the greater likelihood the remedy will be perceived as a new injustice rather than a remedy applied to the right people for the right people. That is partly why elites love to tell stories about injustices were long past capable of doing anything about in the present, to distract from current injustice that could actually be tagged to the originator. The search for ancient injustices keeps us ricocheting and degenerates into stereotypical thinking, whereas building a skill and a legacy is harder to take away.
  8. When it’s directed at the wrong people yes.
  9. For those of you who enjoy research into unintended consequences: [think before following links] [think before following links] https://networkcontagion.us/wp-content/uploads/Instructing-Animosity_11.13.24.pdf. Unfortunately even things as well indented as DEI sometimes have consequences that are the opposite of the intended result.
  10. I say, all people rise up and be your highest selves. If you think shaming is an effective tactic then by all means don’t let me tell you what to do. I’m only advocating targeting the right people to shame. Collective punishment has a way of turning individual justice into a group-level beef.
  11. I like what you said here BootmanLA but this is also happening in Europe, where you can’t make the same argument. Native Europeans are being shamed as racists for resenting the resource reallocation presented by mass migration. The pattern of white-shaming is bigger than just the colonial lands. Without disagreeing with you that the colonial past has marginalized native communities can we at least explore whether white-shaming is an effective tactic, especially as collective punishment for an unequal universe? Or is it really a good tactic to smear people by race even if their past ancestors seem enviable through a modern lens?
  12. The bombing of Syria after the white hats staged the Assad chemical attack and the assassination of Soleimani would be two examples of Trumps erratic behavior gone bad, but that same erratic behavior produced a brief detente with North Korea
  13. One of my most hung ex boyfriends was an Israeli top btw so maybe it’s not THAT bad to be abu Gharibed by a fucker-Knesset 🙂
  14. Eventually only Israelis will be allowed by the WHO and UN to be tops. The rest of you clown-tops will be bitches of your national traitor-governments.
  15. Spent a lot of time researching this today. Basically, the Ziopublicans tried to honeypot-Epstein Gaetz because he wasn’t kissing the AIPAC ring. Most Republicans are Zionists. So they are happy to Epstein the AIPAC-free Gaetz to make him into a eunuch. And the Democratic and Republican partisans are both too compromised to stand up to the Zionist parasites, who bit the heads of both parties from the inside until they are hollow. But no Democrats could see that except maybe Dennis Kucinich, the old anti-war hero.
  16. It doesn’t look as if this data explains WHY they view him unfavorably. Much of the unfavorably has to do with right/left politics and his “attack” on the judiciary branch last year as well as his corruption. Unfortunately as ILANA Mercer points out ([think before following links] https://www.ilanamercer.com/2024/05/jewish-state-genocidal-israeli-society-sick/) there is enormous support among Israelis for the genocide.
  17. I hear you. No intel on that but it does look less than good.
  18. Would you mind elaboration on your wish to see them go?
  19. This is truly great news. It’s too bad that 88% of Israelis support his genocidal policies.
  20. His accuser, Joel Greenberg , was involved in a sex trafficking ring and he was eventually sentenced for it. It consisted of getting girls for sugar daddy’s and at least one was a minor. However Joel did a plea bargain where he lies and tried to implicate Matt Gaetz. For political reasons the Zio press jumped all over this. Joel isn’t reliable. He has 33 felonies the list of amazingly stupid things he did is enormous. Even the completely corrupted Merrick Garland refused to prosecute the case. Sorry to see him go.
  21. Putin just fired an ICBM into Ukraine that could reach any European capital and could contain nukes. But I bet NATO will keep poking the bear.
  22. The homicidal Deathmocrats will finally have their geriatric “remember-me” fingers off the red box, and hopefully the new Red-rum-licans will (maybe-but-maybe-not) know how to de-escalate.
  23. Which of them will do the most good? The most harm? Which of them will be the most and least fashionable? Which of them are the most and least fuckable? Or are you waiting for Treasury Secretary appointment to drop before you respond?
  24. All good (say I , the OP) great to see a diversity of thought even when it doesn’t favor my own interpretation. Bring it on and keep it coming 🙂. The chat inspired me to look at stats on civilian casualties in the conflict, even one is one too many 😞. I hope we the residents of the planet figure out collectively how to de-escalate before the cost of disagreement is the entire species. Where’s a big scary homo-sapien-uniting alien when you need it?
  25. That sounds like neocon propaganda to me but would love to see any figures and sources you have.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Guidelines. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.