xyvortex Posted June 23, 2012 Report Share Posted June 23, 2012 You hear about people living longer and longer with HIV, some even taking years to start meds. Have there been any studies to see if the more virulent strains aren't killing themselves off? I mean it would kind of make sense. a virus that kills it's host quickly has less chance to replicate and be passed on while a more 'domesticated' one would so much better. Does anybody know if research has been done on this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators rawTOP Posted June 23, 2012 Administrators Report Share Posted June 23, 2012 I mean it would kind of make sense. a virus that kills it's host quickly has less chance to replicate and be passed on while a more 'domesticated' one would so much better. I used to say that exact thing, but when you introduce meds into the equation it changes things. Meds make it less likely for you to get the well-behaved strains and more likely to get the problem, drug-resistant strains. Then again, we don't see a lot of strains that are completely drug resistant... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bearbandit Posted June 23, 2012 Report Share Posted June 23, 2012 The little fucker is constantly evolving - that's how drug resistance comes about. More work needs to be done with elite controllers: what have they got that the rest of us don't? Similiarly long term non-progressors, who I believe are now defined as needing a fairly basic combination which they can stay on for years without any trace of HIV damage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HungLatinDom Posted June 23, 2012 Report Share Posted June 23, 2012 HIV in particular and viruses in general are always evolving and adapting. However, there's not a particularly high selective pressure on HIV to become less virulent. WHy? because HIV is already not too virulent in the short to medium term. It can be inside you without many symptoms for 2 to 10 years. In that time it can be transmitted to several hosts. So, I do not think that the evolution of HIV is going in that direction, but in natural populations with extremely high infection rates, that indeed might happen, if only because viral evolution is much faster than human. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fillmyhole Posted June 24, 2012 Report Share Posted June 24, 2012 Yes, it is constantly changing.. Just look at this site for instant, for many bottoms, becoming positive is like a license to be able to accept all loads.. Imagine that toxic pool mixing and being aborsed constantly into their system.. How do you think HIV 2 came unto the seen and i am sure son there will be type 3 & 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HungLatinDom Posted June 24, 2012 Report Share Posted June 24, 2012 Fillmyhole, I am sorry, but that's not correct at all. HIV 2 is not related at all to barebacking among gay men. HIV 2 was also discovered in Africa and it is more prevalent there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now