What's the ideal ratio of bottoms to top. A poll

[muscmtl]

I`m on the other end of the spectrum. An orgy that has at least one strict-top is a one top too many (maybe why every orgy you see in porn is awlays a let down since you`ll always have the guy who thinks he is too-hot to bottom). In group -sex, I wanna fuck every single guy, if one escapes, it`s not an orgy, it`s a suburbian-basement sex thing for immature teens. Of course, I`ll give up my ass (even though I hate it) to anyone who wants.

Bottoms who only want to bottom are never an issue, they`re the solution

So not a top/bottom ratio, but the conviction that every man there is sexally mature man (aka, willing to do it all.)

Steve

[mjkuhl]

I like the way you think

I`m on the other end of the spectrum. An orgy that has at least one strict-top is a one top too many (maybe why every orgy you see in porn is awlays a let down since you`ll always have the guy who thinks he is too-hot to bottom). In group -sex, I wanna fuck every single guy, if one escapes, it`s not an orgy, it`s a suburbian-basement sex thing for immature teens. Of course, I`ll give up my ass (even though I hate it) to anyone who wants.

Bottoms who only want to bottom are never an issue, they`re the solution

So not a top/bottom ratio, but the conviction that every man there is sexally mature man (aka, willing to do it all.)

Steve

[GermanFucker]

I`m on the other end of the spectrum. An orgy that has at least one strict-top is a one top too many (maybe why every orgy you see in porn is awlays a let down since you`ll always have the guy who thinks he is too-hot to bottom). In group -sex, I wanna fuck every single guy, if one escapes, it`s not an orgy, it`s a suburbian-basement sex thing for immature teens. Of course, I`ll give up my ass (even though I hate it) to anyone who wants.

Bottoms who only want to bottom are never an issue, they`re the solution

So not a top/bottom ratio, but the conviction that every man there is sexally mature man (aka, willing to do it all.)

Steve

Strangely I find the idea that rather than just live and let live (and enjoy oneself sexually every which way one pleases) there is a right and a wrong way to have an orgy quite immature. Sometimes maturity means accepting the world for what it is.

Don't get me wrong, I understand the allure for versatile guys to have a party where everyone has to both top and bottom. If I were vers. I'd find such a setup very hot. But I'm one of those natural tops (Bottoming doesn't give me any sexual pleasure at all, to me it's the same as wearing diapers, eating feces etc.). So I can't go to such a party. In reality, your suggestion is like me saying there should be women, too, because hey, the other guys should be willing to do it all. But just as I can accept that not everyone is bi, it's a fact that not everyone is versatile.

As to the initial question: If you have three or more total tops, you need more than one bottom. I know slut bottoms will say "but I took 15 loads once". Big whoop, I fucked 15 guys once, seeding 6 of them in one night. But that's the exception, not the rule. In reality / everyday life if you have four tops (meaning around 10 loads), even most good bottoms will run into problems (staying clean, getting sore etc.) over the course of an evening. So you need an alternate, if you want the group to enjoy themselves for hours (i.e. if it's about the fun, not just about the numbers / challenge for the bottom). So anything from 1-1 to 1-2.5 (maybe slightly higher for very large groups) is a good ratio, and you can trow in as many (truly) versatile guys (meaning: who like both positions equally, not versatile bottoms) as you like.