Jump to content

meds and testing


Recommended Posts

  • Administrators

As I understand it there are two types of tests.

The standard looks for antibodies to HIV. So if you're undetectable you still have antibodies and will show up as poz. The only unexpected thing with those tests is that people who have been in HIV vaccine trials may test positive even when they're neg because their bodies have created antibodies in reaction to the vaccine.

The other test is an RNA test. If I understand that test correctly it's actually looking for the virus, not the antibodies. In that case someone who is undetectable might test neg. Not 100% sure about that though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I understand it there are two types of tests.

The standard looks for antibodies to HIV. So if you're undetectable you still have antibodies and will show up as poz. The only unexpected thing with those tests is that people who have been in HIV vaccine trials may test positive even when they're neg because their bodies have created antibodies in reaction to the vaccine.

The other test is an RNA test. If I understand that test correctly it's actually looking for the virus, not the antibodies. In that case someone who is undetectable might test neg. Not 100% sure about that though.

This is correct with a couple notes,

ELISA and western blot are both antibody tests for HIV, the main failure of this method is that the body takes time to show antibodies thus why there is a window period.

NAT or nucleic acid testing is very similar to viral load testing in people who are HIV poz. This test shortens the window period to roughly two-three weeks. This test is also what blood banks use now, and yes you are correct that someone who is very well controlled may test neg. NAT testing is becoming a lot more common because despite being more expensive, it dramatically shortens the window period. The clinic I go to does antibody testing while you are there, then send the samples out for NAT testing.

One thing that has become interesting is that people who are on long term ARV's and very responsive to them have been shown to sometimes albeit rarely test neg on both tests because of how antibodies slowly dissapear overtime in response to some illnesses. Now this is on the order of over 10 years, but it has happened.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Guidelines. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.