justin_13 Posted February 1, 2014 Report Posted February 1, 2014 Here's my true story. I've been a cock sucker and cum swallower for more than 30 years. I'm bi and have always had a girl in my life on the side but I will always need cock to suck. I engaged in bareback sex over the years and went thru some wild risky periods in London and France where I was hanging at sex clubs but always tested neg. I calmed down and went back to my true passion of sucking cock and swallowing cum. About 2 years ago I had a bad reaction to an antibiotic and ended up sick for two weeks. It just so happened that a regular suck buddy announced that he had tested positive. I think when he heard I was sick he assumed I has converted. I went to the clinic for a rapid test and it came back positive. My world came crashing down. I made an appt with an HIV specialist and they started me on meds while waiting for my viral load results. The HIV doctor looked at my viral results and said they were abnormally low so wanted to retest. I stayed on the meds for a month and the doctors office called and asked me to come in. I was a nervous wreck. The doctor came in and announced I was HIV neg. the oral quick results at the clinic had produced a false positive. Probably due to the allergic reaction to the antibiotics so my the results showed false. After this scare I was furious that the clinic who was supposed to send the blood in for a more I depth HIV test to confirm the initial positive results never followed through. But since that event I am terrified of getting tested. I no longer BB but still suck cock and swallow cum. Wow. What do you think of this true life event? I had always tested at least twice a year
fillmyholeftl Posted February 1, 2014 Report Posted February 1, 2014 If you are only doing oral, you are engaging in relatively minimal risky behavior. I would not let the one bad experience with testing stop you from a good record of staying informed of your health. GO BACK TO TESTING TWICE A YEAR. And suck more COCK
Administrators rawTOP Posted February 1, 2014 Administrators Report Posted February 1, 2014 You shouldn't be afraid. Ultimately the system worked and you found out you were neg. And you now know that you need two positive results before you believe the diagnosis. Next time don't go on meds until you have the 2nd result back. Oh yeah, almost no one becomes poz through sucking dick. You really have very little to be worried about.
Guest Posted February 1, 2014 Report Posted February 1, 2014 Wow...that is very odd they would start you on meds based on an oral test alone. I think the protocol is pretty clear that once an oral test shows positive a confirmatory western blot blood test is performed, then a viral load test....What clinic was this? I would report that doctor .....that's negligence if not malpractice
Guest JizzDumpWI Posted February 1, 2014 Report Posted February 1, 2014 Fear won't help you... Ultimately it is a decision not a sentence. While your foundation for it is valid, that was one clinic which I a sure you'll never return to. Try new clinic, and test at least 2x per year.
bearbandit Posted February 1, 2014 Report Posted February 1, 2014 I can't remember what the figure is for supposed oral transmissions. It's theoretically possible, but as far as I can see you'd have to be sucking someone with a fairly high viral load while at the same time having the sort of mouth damage that would really put you off the idea of sucking cock and swallowing pain killers instead. Home testing kits are about to become legal in the UK and one of the concerns about them is their accuracy (86%), which with something as serious as HIV can be just isn't good enough. My view of home testing in the UK is that if you're adult enough to be fucking, you're adult enough to go to a registered testing centre and have it done there. The other thing with the incidence of HIV via cocksucking is how many guys swear blind that they never took it up the ass, like it's less "gay", and therefore more respectable, to suck a dick than sit on it. I'm convinced that enough guys have told this comforting little "I'm not really gay" lie to skew the transmission figures. The only guy with HIV who wasn't an IV user who I've believed when he said he never had anal sex reckoned he got it from a blood transfusion during an operation before blood was routinely screened in the UK. Please, go and have your regular test and don't worry about it.
barefootbob Posted February 1, 2014 Report Posted February 1, 2014 You would have to have bleeding gums for the slightest of risks for getting HIV through sucking dick
VersatileBreeder Posted February 2, 2014 Report Posted February 2, 2014 I'm confused... Either I missed something in your story or this clinic really messed something up. So, if I have this right... 1) You took an oral test and it came up positive, then... 2) They didn't confirm it with a Western Blot test(?), then... 3) An HIV doctor put you on meds and... 4) Tested your blood for viral load and said it was abnormally low, so.... 5) Gave you another oral test, which came back negative. Did I get that right? What confuses me about this is two things. First, how could the clinic confirm your positive result without a confirmatory test? Secondly, how does your doctor claim that your viral load is abnormally low if you don't have HIV to begin with? No HIV should equal NO viral load, not abnormally low viral load.
fillmyholeftl Posted February 2, 2014 Report Posted February 2, 2014 Aren't you glad you see Doctors that know what they are doing??? I'm confused... Either I missed something in your story or this clinic really messed something up. So, if I have this right...1) You took an oral test and it came up positive, then... 2) They didn't confirm it with a Western Blot test(?), then... 3) An HIV doctor put you on meds and... 4) Tested your blood for viral load and said it was abnormally low, so.... 5) Gave you another oral test, which came back negative. Did I get that right? What confuses me about this is two things. First, how could the clinic confirm your positive result without a confirmatory test? Secondly, how does your doctor claim that your viral load is abnormally low if you don't have HIV to begin with? No HIV should equal NO viral load, not abnormally low viral load.
VersatileBreeder Posted February 2, 2014 Report Posted February 2, 2014 Aren't you glad you see Doctors that know what they are doing??? Damn straight on that one! Thanks again for the referral!
justin_13 Posted February 2, 2014 Author Report Posted February 2, 2014 Let me respond to a few of your questions. The health clinic that did the rapid test is in Honolulu. It wasn't oral or was a finger prick. Blood test. Once the 20 mn results showed positive. I was told to contact an HIV doctor which I did. The clinic was suppose to send in for the western blot and confirm the results. They never got back with me. I called an HIV dr and during the initial appt they drew blood to test viral load and started me on meds. I went in a couple weeks later for the viral results and at that time he noticed the numbers were odd. He said a recent infection would show higher numbers ??? So he started to doubt the results. They took blood again. I also remember the nurse threw the needle in my arm as if she was afraid of catching HIV. I told her about it too. The doc wasn't trying to get my hopes up and I assumed the worse. When I got the call to come to the hospital I knew the results would be positive. I delayed a week calling them back. When I finally went in the Dr said he wanted to deliver me the news himself. He hugged me and said I am HIV neg. True story guys. I can also tell you about a dream I had prior to my HIV office visit but this is probably not the place for a story like that here.
justin_13 Posted February 2, 2014 Author Report Posted February 2, 2014 Excuse my finger typing. The clinic did a finger prick blood test. It wasn't an oral swab. These damn iPhones are hard to type on.
Guest JizzDumpWI Posted February 2, 2014 Report Posted February 2, 2014 disturbing, at least... but there are certainly enough instances of poor practise for me to not be shocked, although we all should be...
justin_13 Posted February 2, 2014 Author Report Posted February 2, 2014 You're also correct that the test the HIV Dr found odd wasn't the level of HIV but perhaps my T cell count or something? What ever it was I thank god he noticed that something didn't seem right. The doc wasn't concerned about the fact I was on meds for no reason, although it cost me over $600 the first 30 days. I contacted my insurance to order a second 30 day supply at a much more reasonable cost and had to give my Drs name etc. when I called back to confirm delivery of the 2nd month the insurance said something about the Dr didn't authorize it. That was right before I learned I was HIV neg so I assume the insurance company new the results before I did.
NYCBearpig Posted February 2, 2014 Report Posted February 2, 2014 I can't remember what the figure is for supposed oral transmissions. It's theoretically possible, but as far as I can see you'd have to be sucking someone with a fairly high viral load while at the same time having the sort of mouth damage that would really put you off the idea of sucking cock and swallowing pain killers instead. Except that's precisely how I was infected but not quite as you describe. With certain gum disease/stages of the illness, there is no pain, there is no bleeding, but the gums are open to many types of bacteria and viruses, especially following some routine scaling or surgeries that are necessary.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now