Administrators rawTOP Posted August 13, 2010 Administrators Report Share Posted August 13, 2010 On another forum a bunch of gay webmasters are debating the difference between a STUD and a HUNK. What do you guys think the difference is? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhoenixGeoff Posted August 13, 2010 Report Share Posted August 13, 2010 "Hunk" to me refers almost totally to physical appearance. (But I personally rarely if ever use the term) "Stud" has more of a connotation of virility and sexual prowess. Maybe a bit more likely to be a top rather than a bottom (truly straight guys are pretty much never "studs" to me) although a masculine vers-bottom can be a stud too. Perhaps also something of masculine appearance and bearing too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slut4anyload Posted August 13, 2010 Report Share Posted August 13, 2010 J agree - I'm looking at a hunk for the visual appeal of his body although I, too, would tend not to use the term. A stud is somebody I'm wanting to fuck me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Boxir55 Posted August 13, 2010 Report Share Posted August 13, 2010 I would say a hunk is more a good looking well muscled guy who may or may not be good in bed. A stud to me is a guy who probably has a bigger than average cock and who knows how to use it, the type of guy you want to be with regularly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Belfast-Bottom Posted August 14, 2010 Report Share Posted August 14, 2010 I agree that HUNK is defined by good looks/appearance - he might be crap in bed. A STUD is defined by sexual prowess/stamina. I'd much rather get fucked by an ugly STUD who can get hard, stay hard and deliver a load, than by a sexually incompetent pretty boy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhoenixGeoff Posted August 16, 2010 Report Share Posted August 16, 2010 I'd much rather get fucked by an ugly STUD who can get hard, stay hard and deliver a load, than by a sexually incompetent pretty boy. Not to derail the thread, but what is it with the pretty boys who are sexually incompetent? I guess it stems from spending all your time in the bathhouse throwing attitude around instead of actually having sex (and learning how to be good at it in the process). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cumpupt Posted August 16, 2010 Report Share Posted August 16, 2010 Have to agree a hunk is well muscled gorgeous guy who might be a stud A stud is a guy who knows how to fuck and use what he's got doesn't have to be a top My personal taste is for hunky studs and luckily my bf is one and we know quite a few who we regularly play with Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now