What's The Difference Between A Stud And A Hunk?

[rawTOP]

On another forum a bunch of gay webmasters are debating the difference between a STUD and a HUNK. What do you guys think the difference is?

[PhoenixGeoff]

"Hunk" to me refers almost totally to physical appearance. (But I personally rarely if ever use the term)

"Stud" has more of a connotation of virility and sexual prowess. Maybe a bit more likely to be a top rather than a bottom (truly straight guys are pretty much never "studs" to me) although a masculine vers-bottom can be a stud too. Perhaps also something of masculine appearance and bearing too.

[Slut4anyload]

J agree - I'm looking at a hunk for the visual appeal of his body although I, too, would tend not to use the term. A stud is somebody I'm wanting to fuck me.

[Guest Boxir55]

I would say a hunk is more a good looking well muscled guy who may or may not be good in bed. A stud to me is a guy who probably has a bigger than average cock and who knows how to use it, the type of guy you want to be with regularly.

[Belfast-Bottom]

I agree that HUNK is defined by good looks/appearance - he might be crap in bed.

A STUD is defined by sexual prowess/stamina.

I'd much rather get fucked by an ugly STUD who can get hard, stay hard and deliver a load, than by a sexually incompetent pretty boy.

[PhoenixGeoff]

I'd much rather get fucked by an ugly STUD who can get hard, stay hard and deliver a load, than by a sexually incompetent pretty boy.

Not to derail the thread, but what is it with the pretty boys who are sexually incompetent?

I guess it stems from spending all your time in the bathhouse throwing attitude around instead of actually having sex (and learning how to be good at it in the process).

[cumpupt]

Have to agree a hunk is well muscled gorgeous guy who might be a stud

A stud is a guy who knows how to fuck and use what he's got doesn't have to be a top

My personal taste is for hunky studs and luckily my bf is one and we know quite a few who we regularly play with