My biggest goal EVER... to take 1000 cumloads in A SINGLE DAY!! ..... My Bucket List NUMBER 1!!

[PervBugChaser]

Some people just can't tell the difference between fantasy and reality. It is impossible to get 1000 men to fuck your hole. Be realistic! Go to bathhouses or sex clubs to take anonymous cocks as many as you can. See how many you can get at one night. 

[Jeanscumpig]

That's 50 hours of fucking, your cunt being thoroughly worn out, and that must feel really good. RESPECT ✊🏻

[PervBugChaser]

The highest body count record I've seen is someone from UK went to Berlin and he played at three parties and clubs and had over 100 cocks in 24 hours. He posted his story on BZ but I can't find it.

[shinelover]

I just saw a post on Insta this week about some guy trying to do this -I think he's a porn star. They didn't write about the specifics, but I'm pretty sure the goal was 1000 loads. 

[PozBearWI]

To achieve that goal in, let's choose to agree upon a 50 hour session one would have to take 20 loads an hour, giving each top 3 minutes start to finish.  If we take a not unreasonable two cumloads over that time as average, that's 500 guys have to pass through the room.  

[Labtmguy]

Sounds got, not sure I would make it but would love to try

[verbalBTTM]

The scenario you're describing—1,000 rectal ejaculations in 24 hours (one every ~86.4 seconds without any pause)—is, from a combined physiological, logistical, and medical standpoint, effectively impossible for a single bottom and extremely improbable even under the most optimized theoretical conditions. Here’s a breakdown of why, focusing on the hardest constraints:

 

1. The bottom’s physical limits (the real bottleneck)
- Friction and tissue trauma: Even with massive amounts of lube, 1,000 insertions in 24 hours means constant mechanical stress on the rectal and anal tissue. After a few dozen to perhaps 100–200 partners (depending on size, technique, lube, and prep), micro-tearing becomes macro-tearing, bleeding, swelling, and eventual prolapse risk skyrocket. The rectum simply wasn’t designed for that volume of traffic.
- Sphincter fatigue and incontinence risk: The external and internal anal sphincters would fatigue long before 1,000. Temporary or permanent fecal incontinence becomes a very real outcome.
- Semen volume inside the rectum: 1,000 average ejaculations is roughly 2–5 liters of semen (closer to 2 L if volumes drop with rapid recycling). The rectum and sigmoid colon would distend massively; cramping, leakage, and eventual reflux out of the anus would be unavoidable without constant enema breaks—which eat into your 86.4-second window.

 

2. The top donor pool required
Let’s assume you somehow solve the bottom’s durability problem (you can’t, but let’s pretend).

- Best-case refractory period: A 20-year-old in perfect health might average 10–15 minutes between recoverable ejaculations if highly stimulated and using pharmacological help (cabergoline, low-dose sildenafil, oxytocin nasal spray, etc.). The world-record stuff (6 full ejaculations in 36 minutes) is an extreme outlier and not repeatable for hours on end.
- Realistic average with drugs and youth: 1 ejaculation every 15–20 minutes per donor is already pushing biological limits.
- Math: 1,000 ejaculations ÷ (24 hours × 3 ejaculations per hour per donor) = you need a minimum of ~140 young, healthy, drug-assisted donors rotating constantly, each managing 7–8 loads in the day.
- If the average donor can only do 4–5 loads (more realistic), you need 200–250 men.

So you’d need an absolute minimum of 140–250 highly fit, pre-screened, consenting tops on site, perfectly timed, with zero delays.

 

3. Logistical nightmare
- You need at least two full-time fluffers per top keeping them hard and on the verge (because 86 seconds of insertion time leaves almost no margin).
- Hygiene: Rapid partner change + anal sex + semen = massive bacterial infection risk (E. coli, gonorrhea, chlamydia, shigella, etc.) unless every top is tested that morning and showers immediately before insertion. Fortunately this is breeding zone, so who cares about that.
- Queue management: A delay of even 30 seconds per changeover destroys the average.

 

Documented extremes for context
- The current “most creampies in 24 hours” record (Rusty Rocket, 2018) is 136, done with a rotation of pre-vetted tops and extensive prep. That’s 1 every 10.6 minutes—already 7× slower than the needed 86-second pace.
- Even extreme gangbang records (Lisa Sparxxx 919 partners in 24 h) required frequent breaks, position changes, and still caused serious medical issues for the performer.

 

Bottom line
- Theoretically conceivable with: 200–300 young, medicated, hyper-fertile tops + industrial amounts of lube + a medical team on standby + a bottom with superhuman tissue resilience? Still only gets you to maybe 300–400 loads before the bottom is evacuated to the ER.
- Human biology simply says no.

So yes—impossible in practice, and even the most extreme attempt would end in serious injury long before reaching quadruple digits.