BootmanLA Posted January 28 Report Posted January 28 On 1/25/2025 at 11:24 AM, insatiableholeinTO said: Well in light of the pre-emptive presidential pardon given by Joe Biden, moments before Trump was to be sworn in. I think it puts to rest any doubt about Faucci's guilt regarding covid 19 and that jab some people call a vaccine That's a pretty silly take. When an incoming administration has publicly stated he wants not only prosecution (for people DOING THEIR FUCKING JOBS), but unspecified "consequences" (which his horde of violent supporters will correctly interpret as "take them out"), a pardon is about the only thing that makes sense. At least take the prosecution off the table. And yes, it is a vaccine. I'll take the words of the tens of thousands of medical professionals and researchers as to what it is over ... checking notes... some insatiable hole in Toronto. On 1/25/2025 at 2:19 PM, insatiableholeinTO said: Hmm speaking of January 6th Biden also gave presidential pardon to each and every one of them. You call him a lunatic? I don't particularly care for Trump but Faucci and every member of that committee should be behind bars. Also when Trump was in office he didn't give pardon to his family or himself because when you accept a pardon, you are admitting guilt First, that last part is just not true. It's a gross misreading of the law promoted by simpletons and believed by the gullible. If you're equating the actions of insurrectionist rioters beating cops with flagpoles, driving stun guns into their necks and smashing their shields into their skulls, such that some of them died from their injuries (let's call them the J6 mob) with the actions of the US representatives, including two Republicans, who conducted investigations into what happened and to what extent the Trump administration was responsible for instigating those actions (let's call them the J6 Committee), then you don't understand what equivalences are. And as noted above, these people were DOING THEIR JOBS - serving on a legitimately constituted House Select Committee - and deserved none of the opprobrium and threats of prosecution from a vindictive, thin-skinned, petty, tyrannical tinpot emperor wannabe like Trump that they got. A pardon - to keep them out of the reach of a vendetta by Trump's DOJ - is again the LEAST any reasonable president could do. 5
Infected Posted January 28 Report Posted January 28 Enjoys the idiots who don’t vote but feel they have a GOD given right to talk about politics and demean those that they disagree with and most likely voted. (Pops more popcorn for the flame wars) 😝 1
Poz50something Posted January 29 Report Posted January 29 On 5/25/2024 at 2:49 PM, insatiableholeinTO said: Well how many jabs have you taken? After being told in the beginning just one jab and we' ll be through this. How many? that's akin to saying - how many pills have we taken? People are so used to taking a round of antibiotics and the virus would be eliminated, not this constant need to take pills for the rest of one's life.....Well, because of the evolution of the HIV virus, mutations survive. I don't think the Covid-19 virus is any different. Who told us we would only take one vaccine? We have to take yearly flu vaccines.......
PozBearWI Posted January 29 Report Posted January 29 It was never going to be "one jab". That was never, ever part of the expectations for this vaccine or any of the other rapidly mutating viruses we have out there.
Erik62 Posted January 29 Report Posted January 29 13 hours ago, BootmanLA said: That's a pretty silly take. When an incoming administration has publicly stated he wants not only prosecution (for people DOING THEIR FUCKING JOBS), but unspecified "consequences" (which his horde of violent supporters will correctly interpret as "take them out"), a pardon is about the only thing that makes sense. At least take the prosecution off the table. And yes, it is a vaccine. I'll take the words of the tens of thousands of medical professionals and researchers as to what it is over ... checking notes... some insatiable hole in Toronto. First, that last part is just not true. It's a gross misreading of the law promoted by simpletons and believed by the gullible. If you're equating the actions of insurrectionist rioters beating cops with flagpoles, driving stun guns into their necks and smashing their shields into their skulls, such that some of them died from their injuries (let's call them the J6 mob) with the actions of the US representatives, including two Republicans, who conducted investigations into what happened and to what extent the Trump administration was responsible for instigating those actions (let's call them the J6 Committee), then you don't understand what equivalences are. And as noted above, these people were DOING THEIR JOBS - serving on a legitimately constituted House Select Committee - and deserved none of the opprobrium and threats of prosecution from a vindictive, thin-skinned, petty, tyrannical tinpot emperor wannabe like Trump that they got. A pardon - to keep them out of the reach of a vendetta by Trump's DOJ - is again the LEAST any reasonable president could do. All these gay men who complained about the COVID vaccines being unproven, WTF 😱!! how much testing time do they believe AZT & all the other EARLY Anti Retro VIRALS received. Most gay men with HIV/AIDS, in the early years, jumped onto the ART bandwagon in the same way they would stuff their faces with Minties. Times have changed & so has HYPOCRISY 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬. 1 1
PozBearWI Posted January 29 Report Posted January 29 Hmmm, let's see I am faced with certain death or an unproven experimental drug.... what to choose what to choose....?
insatiableholeinTO Posted January 30 Report Posted January 30 On 1/28/2025 at 3:19 PM, BootmanLA said: That's a pretty silly take. When an incoming administration has publicly stated he wants not only prosecution (for people DOING THEIR FUCKING JOBS), but unspecified "consequences" (which his horde of violent supporters will correctly interpret as "take them out"), a pardon is about the only thing that makes sense. At least take the prosecution off the table. And yes, it is a vaccine. I'll take the words of the tens of thousands of medical professionals and researchers as to what it is over ... checking notes... some insatiable hole in Toronto. First, that last part is just not true. It's a gross misreading of the law promoted by simpletons and believed by the gullible. If you're equating the actions of insurrectionist rioters beating cops with flagpoles, driving stun guns into their necks and smashing their shields into their skulls, such that some of them died from their injuries (let's call them the J6 mob) with the actions of the US representatives, including two Republicans, who conducted investigations into what happened and to what extent the Trump administration was responsible for instigating those actions (let's call them the J6 Committee), then you don't understand what equivalences are. And as noted above, these people were DOING THEIR JOBS - serving on a legitimately constituted House Select Committee - and deserved none of the opprobrium and threats of prosecution from a vindictive, thin-skinned, petty, tyrannical tinpot emperor wannabe like Trump that they got. A pardon - to keep them out of the reach of a vendetta by Trump's DOJ - is again the LEAST any reasonable president could do. Where do you get your info from? 1 person died and she was shot by Capitol Police. Your argument that they took the pardon to escape Trump's DOJ is pathetically weak. If they were only doing their job then what is to hide? If you did nothing wrong then why accept a Presidential Pardon? When you accept a Pre emptive Presidential Pardon, you are admitting guilt even before charges have been laid against. So Biden pardons the J6 committee, his wife and 3 other members of his family and Tony Faucci. Yet not one has been charged with a felony yet.Hmmm, and let's not forget he lied to the American people when he said nobody is above the law and he would not pardon his own son. Funny Trump didn't pardon any of his family members. In fact Trump didn't even pardon himself. When asked why not he said " if I would have taken a pardon that would mean I'm admitting I'm guilty. Now you can spin this any way you want personally I could care less. Bottom line the Democrats have been lying to the people long enough and we're sick of their BS. By accepting those pardons and admitting their guilt the democrats have no moral authority whatsoever and the people can see them for who they really are as was apparent in November. 1
insatiableholeinTO Posted January 30 Report Posted January 30 10 hours ago, PozBearWI said: Hmmm, let's see I am faced with certain death or an unproven experimental drug.... what to choose what to choose....? Certain death? What are you talking about? Who put that idea in your head? 1
insatiableholeinTO Posted January 30 Report Posted January 30 On 1/28/2025 at 7:49 PM, Poz50something said: that's akin to saying - how many pills have we taken? People are so used to taking a round of antibiotics and the virus would be eliminated, not this constant need to take pills for the rest of one's life.....Well, because of the evolution of the HIV virus, mutations survive. I don't think the Covid-19 virus is any different. Who told us we would only take one vaccine? We have to take yearly flu vaccines....... Joe Biden and Anthony fucking Faucci that's who. Then it went to a second vaccine, then on to a booster, then a 2nd, 3rd, 4th. How many are you all up to now? Have any of you even attempted to look at the the Pfizer documents that were released by court order that lists the abnormalities and side effects of that jab. Doctors and scientists won't know for at least another 7 years the full implications of what you all put in you bodies. It's a gross miscarriage of science and public health and the fact that you are still in denial is mind boggling. You don't want to listen to reason or look at the documents fine that's your problem not mine. One last question. Do any of you get compensated for being an experimental pin cushion for Pfizer or Moderna? You'd think that with all the taxpayer money that went into developing the jab and with the billions of dollars in profits that Big Pharma made from the jab, did any of you get a slice of the pie? No? Hmmm pity. 1 1 1 1
Erik62 Posted January 30 Report Posted January 30 27 minutes ago, insatiableholeinTO said: Certain death? What are you talking about? Who put that idea in your head? That cohort who refused vaccinations, ultimately didn't live long enough to re-read the statistics, available information & change their minds before they were claiming entry through the "Pearly Gates" of St. Peter.
insatiableholeinTO Posted January 30 Report Posted January 30 3 minutes ago, Erik62 said: That cohort who refused vaccinations, ultimately didn't live long enough to re-read the statistics, available information & change their minds before they were claiming entry through the "Pearly Gates" of St. Peter. Alright then, moving right along
Erik62 Posted January 30 Report Posted January 30 18 minutes ago, insatiableholeinTO said: Joe Biden and Anthony fucking Faucci that's who. Then it went to a second vaccine, then on to a booster, then a 2nd, 3rd, 4th. How many are you all up to now? Have any of you even attempted to look at the the Pfizer documents that were released by court order that lists the abnormalities and side effects of that jab. Doctors and scientists won't know for at least another 7 years the full implications of what you all put in you bodies. It's a gross miscarriage of science and public health and the fact that you are still in denial is mind boggling. You don't want to listen to reason or look at the documents fine that's your problem not mine. One last question. Do any of you get compensated for being an experimental pin cushion for Pfizer or Moderna? You'd think that with all the taxpayer money that went into developing the jab and with the billions of dollars in profits that Big Pharma made from the jab, did any of you get a slice of the pie? No? Hmmm pity. Adverse reactions occurring via inadequate research into side effects will be dealt with in the same way that Thalidamide & Johnson & Johnsons female IUD??? with legal action. Even with a class action it still DOES NOT PROVE that millions of lives weren't saved. 1
Erik62 Posted January 30 Report Posted January 30 16 hours ago, Erik62 said: All these gay men who complained about the COVID vaccines being unproven, WTF 😱!! how much testing time do they believe AZT & all the other EARLY Anti Retro VIRALS received. Most gay men with HIV/AIDS, in the early years, jumped onto the ART bandwagon in the same way they would stuff their faces with Minties. Times have changed & so has HYPOCRISY 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬. My apologies 🤔. I probably could have been more subtle 🧐.
PozBearWI Posted January 30 Report Posted January 30 53 minutes ago, insatiableholeinTO said: Certain death? What are you talking about? Who put that idea in your head? I gather you were not a sexually active adult in the late 1980's.... 1 1
Erik62 Posted January 30 Report Posted January 30 (edited) 13 hours ago, insatiableholeinTO said: Certain death? What are you talking about? Who put that idea in your head? Probably the worldwide deaths that caused COVID or COVID related illness. Edited January 30 by Erik62 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now