Are AI stories okay?

[Pozzible]

I’m starting one here. Please delete if it’s not allowed.

jim

[tobetrained]

I don't have an issue with AI stories. The human guidance is what makes it good.

But AI images and video are boring. It's basically just animation...and there's already animation. I like people and their flaws.

[gaynudist6969]

16 hours ago, tobetrained said:

I don't have an issue with AI stories. The human guidance is what makes it good.

But AI images and video are boring. It's basically just animation...and there's already animation. I like people and their flaws.

Plus,the AI images are disturbing.  Example, more than five fingers to a hand.

[Levi]

Not a mod, but I'd prefer not to see any AI content anywhere on this or any other site.

[Berny-13189]

Story: yes, images: no, videos: no.

AI has to be mentioned at the start of a story, at the start of each chapter.

If someone does not like AI, reading ends with that "AI statement".

As of today. I will check my position after reading AI generated content.

[minthulf]

personaly I find the output of those automatic generation engines to be bad, both in substance and quality; the writing of stuff ought be part of the fun. I can see it being used to help the author along but it shouldn't be the end itself, just a starting point for the writer

[Pozzible]

Thanks for the feedback. In the future I will definitely label each chapter as AI. I started The Biohazard Brand (title by AI), hoping it would be a good use of my creative skills. Creating just gets me in the zone and gives me something to be excited by. So far, I’m not feeling that AI is especially rewarding, but I’ve gotten enough positive feedback to stick with it for a bit. And any ideas you have for me would be much appreciated. 

[sevren]

I don’t think it should be banned, but definitely should have clear indication the story is AI generated for the reader. 

[ukbottom]

When reading the best stories on the site you can clearly pick up that the author has experience of the very specific nuances of chemsex and used that experience to draft an engaging and sexy story that is relatable, even when the story goes beyond the physical boundaries of what is actually possible.

These experiences we participate in are often hard to describe as we experience them in individually unique ways. If you have ever been in a k-hole it can be amazing or alarming. I happen to enjoy it. I can often recall and describe the visuals, but find it  almost impossible to describe the overall experience . Certainly the reason I am not a story writer!

An AI agent using a large language model has zero actual experience of chemsex to call upon, instead having to rely on a relatively small set of relevant information that it can use as reference. I am sure this will change and improve!

What the models can do is write in certain styles with great effectiveness due to their ability to pull from hundreds of years of literature. This seems to translate to AI generated stories being written with a high level of maturity and complexity. However just like the too many fingers we see in AI generated images, this can translate to too many words to say the simplest thing or extra words that a human author would simply edit out. Personally I think this can make a story harder to read and as a result less sexy. 

I applaud the authors giving AI stories a try. Their skill in putting in the correct prompts to the large language model already exceeds my ability.  

I suspect we have to tell the large language models a lot more about the feelings we experience during sex and the impact that drugs have on that.

To get progress there has to be pioneers. The end goal of using every tool at our disposal to get more stories onto this site, is to be encouraged

I would like to see them clearly identified as AI but I'm also realistic enough to know that soon I may not be able to tell if something is written by AI, Human or a combination

@Pozzible Thank you for being a pioneer.