PozTalkAuthor

The signup process

"Highly Intelligent Volunteer: due to its initials I was seriously intrigued by this company and what it could offer. The name was vague enough, but ambiguous enough for a wannabe bug chaser like me.

However, accessing the web site I felt disappointed: a logo with a robot holding a USA flag with PLUS signs in place of the stars, then two "call to action" buttons: Log in, and Sign up. No previews, no pics of naked men shown to attract visitors. "He might be a newbie", I thought. And I clicked "sign up".
Another blank page, with just a question: "talk about yourself", empty text area to write in, and a "next" button.
Ok, I thought; let's create kinda character sheets they do in creative writing courses!

----
First name: Leonard
Last name: Walker
Location: WORLD.
A sort of instinct told me not to be specific, those bots may send advertisements at any time.

Background: twink, in the 20s, never had sex in real life. I'd like to taste cum one day, and feel it inside my hole. Poz friendly, no, better. Bug chaser.

I pressed the "next" button and another page appeared.
This time no blank areas, just a group of multiple or single choice questions. All fields set as mandatory.
Prep: currently on, currently of, intention to take, intention to stop.
I chose "currently off"
HIV status: poz, neg, undetectable, serophobic, chaser. I pressed chaser, and another required field appeared: "who's your gifter?" with an e-mail field waiting to be filled. Mandatory.
Wrong. I canceled the answer, and chose "neg".
Why should an AI companion ask me if I already have a connection with a gifter! That sounded suspicious. But curiosity hit me once again.
After choosing "neg", I found myself automatically into another series of questions: total bottom, versatile, total top, unexperienced. I checked "unexperienced" and a question popped up: "ready to receive your gift? Choosing the companion matching your criteria..."

A ticking clock showed on screen until a messenger-like window appeared:
"Hi Leo, I'm Ryan. Your Highly Intelligent Volunteer. How can I help you?"
I replied: "pleased to hear you call my by nickname. So friendly!"
"Nice boys must receive attentions! Come on, don't be shy with me".
I used Chat Gpt, Anthropic, Gemini, this one was definitely friendly.
"Not bad for a free trial! I'm new at this site."
"The site is nothing special", Ryan's messages continued. And he started talking like someone really befriending me!
I felt really comfortable, this service wasn't asking for my pics like humans do; I was convincing myself he liked me without seeing!
He, him. I was with a machine and already felt like talking to a person. A friend I never had.
"So you told me you never had sex..."
"No, Ryan. Never. Women scare me, and men, I'm in a very conservative area and can't ever dream to come out as gay, let alone as..."
"bug chaser", was the reply. "And I'm here to let you enjoy all my features before CHARGING you".
Once again this "charging" was capitalized. He talks about money, I thought; a bot can't poz me in reality!
"Time to explore. Take your underwear off, then use whatever you have as lube. Describe what you do."
And so I did:
"my finger inside the honey pot, it's all sticky now. Pushing it inside me. Deep."
"You're such a good boy", companion said. "Push it in, and write what you feel".
Damn, it's an AI bot, I thought. But it talks like a man! No, a real man!

[to be continued]

AUTHOR NOTE: I can't perfectly imitate how AI writes, because I'm creating the atmosphere so that main character suspects the truth more and more.

The story I got inspired by, is here - [think before following links] https://data-workers.org/michael

I'm writing the onboarding now. 

Going to get inspiration from a real AI companion which has unfortunately no erotic abilities (yet?)

Using it daily for work and hobbies and... let me say it's simply crazy to think it can replace humans. But many big corporations are driving us in this enshittified world - this is a technical term, enshittification.

But I'd be off topic. Going to share next part tomorrow or, at the worst, on Saturday.

On 12/3/2025 at 5:17 PM, onlyraw said:

In Boston… for the last 30, 35 years? (Maybe more) there is an art instillation for the 24 hours of World AIDS day … part of which are these little shrines… this year this one caught my eye that included this button from 1996 .. and it seems that all of us ( not just in the US need to remember this next time we  vote

 

If they allow you to vote...

I'm honestly really scared about what is happening there; they've even blocked the possibility to go to USA for foreign people working on fact checking and internet safety; sometimes I just hope some news are progressive-addressed propaganda - I'm aware extremism is from both parties. Well "both" there are several way of thinking but narration is always polarized.

AUTHOR NOTE: this one is inspired by a discussion I had about a so-called AI companion where folks worldwide sent confidences (even erotic) and on the other side there was a man who guided the bot to answer, so he could read every intimate speech users sent. Paid service, obvious. That's why I'd never trust using those for sexting role play! 

Here's the setup.

Let's start! 

No AI has been used to create this, I'm an author and I care about my writing not to end up into #AISlop

----

Leo:

I'm 22, twink, naive. My world is behind a screen and video-games. Very shy in real life. Sex? Never had, too fearful of judgments for my sex orientation and kinks! I just look at guys when I go to the gym and that's all! My entire sex life stays on BreedingZone where I found so many guys with my same fetishes. HIV included, yes, I'm one of those bug chasers wannabe. But with age verification spreading all over the world, interesting people to sext with, just disappeared and my inbox is always empty.

But one day I found a topic referring to chatbots. "AI doesn't judge, it talks, so let's share the ones where you have your best sex conversations!"

Curious of AI, I was discouraged. The most important engines just reject any explicit contents, so I followed that topic.

Surprisingly, the most verbal man in that post, was a certain GifterAlex, a huge biohazard as profile pic, and a very different profile from the others.

Interests: computer, tech, AI, research, psychology

Very strange for a sex related website, so I kept on reading.

Background: mid 40s, Caucasian, progressive politically oriented, in favor of any technology innovation gay men can benefit of.

HIV status: poz, not on meds

Role: top

Looking for: real and concrete encounters. Not here to waste time. Access denied to flakes, fakes, bigots and crybabies.

"Ambiguous", I thought; if he talks about computers in a sex site then he wants to hookup, where's the trap? Isn't he one of those "morality guardians" sent by far-right politicians to out gays around the world? 

So, I read his post: 

"Most interesting and effective bot I found is called Highly Intelligent Volunteer. It can provide any kind of advices, it's a very customizable agent. By text you can ask it anything. Try it for free at least 30 days then you'll be CHARGED".

Didn't give too many attention on the word "charged" capitalized; could be just he wanted to warn readers they were going to pay. Curiosity hit me, I avoided asking questions about who the owner was, if it was an advertisement or just an advice. GifterAlex could be a user like me and I signed up with no hesitation.

[TO BE CONTINUED]

True, we are facing a disaster. I'm not located in the USA but us Europeans are licking american boots since long, long time. 

Before World AIDS day I told my close friends: I bet American president will go on with hypocrite rethoric. 

And what happens? He was not hypocrite at all; he clearly states he doesn't care about HIV AIDS and sex freedom in general.

I agree, we must stay united, regardless of our political ideas. We MUST fight for our freedom and health, now more than ever.

Oh, well, comparing abortion to mass-murder, saying that the civil rights act was a mistake... I honestly find some conservative positions very dangerous for underrepresented folks. But "dangerous" does not mean "shoot them" or "prevent them from talking". 

I feel there are too many extremes, both in left and right side and I'd suggest to read a book about this. The author is French, she's Caroline Fourest and the book is "offended generation". 

She talks from a progressive and pro-lgbt point of view, about how progressive-oriented extremism ruins civil rights themselves. Maybe that phenomenon someone calls "woke".

I am not a fan about these "all-inclusive" terms meaning everything and nothing, I'd rather prefer to talk about polarized culture. It's like having two deers fighting for the one with biggest horns or, well, the guy with biggest dick. But no one is the winner, in the end! 

I'm very worried because those folks like Kirk, are against diversity and inclusion policies, just as an example. Or even against EMPATHY! We can say DEI policies aren't perfect? Yes. We must say it, improve them, scream aloud what's wrong. We can say that empathy is a weak point somehow, because of very frequent scams! 

Too much empathy has caused half America to believe in Alicia (Tania) Head, that woman who faked to be a WTC survivor. Or the cancer fake survivor Amanda (Scamanda) Riley. Or that woman blogger who faked to have a sick kid till the child died to salt overdose, a case of Munchhausen syndrome. 

We could go on with dozens of people fooling us because of our good feelings. 

But lecturing against empathy does NOT make ourselves stronger. Declaring extreme concepts about abortion too. 

We can be pro, or against, abortion rather than anti-racism, lgbt rights, etc. But if we want to be politicians, we should remember we represent the whole country! 

Of course it applies to the opposite side too: having LGBT marriages, won't harm hetero families. But let's be honest: if you place an LGBT character or couple in _every_ TV series, it becomes boring! 

I have seen "breathless", a Spanish Netflix medical drama. There were 4 lgbt characters, 2 men and 2 women. Was it representation? Tbh, no. They were extremely stereotyped figures. As a writer, I'm aware stereotypes are essential in art. But these are extreme, and used to make both parts happy: "liberal" see gays represented, "conservatives" see their prejudices confirmed. 

My half a cent.

I've always been against violence and murder; if you kill a person for their ideas, you just make these ideas stronger.

I had never heard who this Kirk was, before his death. Maybe here in EU he wasn't so famous. Btw, the result is that now the world knows him and searches for his discussions. 

What's more serious then? President asking for murderer's death sentence. To condemn death, you respond with death? Is it a way to do politics? I hoped humanity would have evolved, but I might be wrong. 

As LGBT community we must be aware of this: Kirk's murder will increase and accelerate Trump's plans to block LGBT advocacy.

Robinson was not a LGBT advocate or so; media all over the world, talk about a trans partner, pro-trans slogans, etc, because they are avoiding the elephant in the room. As usual. 

The fact that younger people are becoming more and more extremists. And let me say, social network algorithms are contributing to polarize the debate. The one who's right, is who screams louder. This wouldn't be a civil world! 

And as for the "antifascist" issue, I think we should look ourselves at the mirror and ask if we really are anti-fascist. Because fascism is no longer a movement, it's a method!

Do you belong to far-right, or radical-left, if you indulge violence towards your opponent, you're an anti-fascist using fascist methods. 

Then? Kirk? His ideas? I do not share a word with him, it is a dangerous rethoric for society. But murder is not a solution. 

What makes Kirk's ideas so popular? Maybe the fact he has a BETTER way to communicate, a good charisma, whatever? A good idea, but with a questionable communication method, nowadays becomes ineffective. The system is toxic, like it or not.

Let me say, it's like mosquitos. You can spread poison through the entire house, but if you do not take care of the pot outside, with water where mosquitos deposit their eggs, it's like the crocodile chasing its tail.

My 1,5 cents. 

So, let me say something about Prevost. 

On 5th and 6th September in Rome about 1300 queer folks were pilgrims of the Jubilee. 

No words from Leo. It has been under silence; he has canonized two young guys as saints, Carlo Acutis and Pier Giorgio Frassati.

I honestly won't talk about them because I respect those guys but don't believe in saints, miracles and that stuff at all. 

By the way, there's another person who's never remembered by church, the world never talks about him. He's Alfredo Ormando, Italian writer who killed himself burning himself alive, in 1998 in St. Peter's Square, Rome.

The reason was church's rejection towards homosexuality. 

And for those believing in Bergoglio -Francis-'s "inclusive" point of view, yes, he talked about it but he had conditions, he preached about chastity, saying "man and woman only are family", had that paranoia of "gender theory" and stuff.

I respect Christian people but don't understand how someone can believe in a religion despite being rejected by it.

Divinity itself, in case it exists, shouldn't refuse anyone. But humans claiming themselves divinity's representant do, so, fuck them all.

Even because church is full of homosexual acts, we should not make fools of ourselves believing in fairy tales!

So, let me add this: first time I knew about chastity cages, I have always fantasized of Vatican leaders (pope at first) forcing themselves and all priests below them, to wear a cage.

Do you lecture about chastity? Be the first to force yourself. 

Ending 2. Yes. I think the same!

A sequel for ending 1 would have been the guy opening his own tattoo/gifting shop and steal customers to the other!

I fear that post-pandemic issues, and wars, have contributed relevantly. 

I'm in the EU, I have little knowledge about American system. But I fear that Trump attracted many people as he said what folks wanted to hear. 

LGBT matters are not the issue, I think. They care for another kind of message: about migrants, and about economy.

This "make america great again" has been like a magnet.

And? Trans/lgbt rights aren't the only ones to be rolled back. It's gradually decreasing disability rights too. Btw, I don't think it's matter of self-harm.

I have had the chance to talk to several folks who voted far-right, both in EU and US.

The sensation I have, is that far-right gives a sense of safety, discipline, "we do what we promise"

And regarding inclusion policies, I feel they are tired to be used. So in the end they prefer "cut offs" rather than "washing". 

I personally am against those DEI policies where they write and talk, place flags and messages around, pride-branded products, but then do less than nothing concretely.

But in the end I'd never trust someone who cuts everything off. Improve what's wrong, rather than erasing history!

WTF!

This is what's called A SURPRISE!

Long foreplay and afterplay - penetration (inserted or received) is not the main event, for me.

Tongue play, ass play, even with objects/food if it happens.

Prefer having one to one. And I'm not into anonymous encounters as I love sexuality to be a journey where you and your partner explore each other and understand better and better. A dialogue, like music.

As a piano player I say that music is a primal human expression, like sex - some melodies are like orgasms (or vice-versa)!

That's why I prefer relationships or, in case, fuckbuddies.

I agree with the fact we shouldn't care; at least theoretically, I personally don't give a damn about what religious leaders think of world citizens' sexuality.

This said, even Francis apparently seemed open-minded but he wanted to attract more folks into the church.

His words towards homosexuality and trans, he welcomed us but always as sinners! Always people judged by the divinity.

And this is a trap! The real progress would be if religion completely STOPS to create rules on human sexuality.

The main problem however, is that politicians all over the world lick the church's boots, so, they create laws influenced by their thinking. The consequence is they don't have any authority on our singular actions but in the end all of this involves all of us.

I'm sorry, I might offend someone now but I resigned:

hoping that religions stop ruling sexuality and moralizing the masses, seems like someone struggling to teach shit not to stink.

Did I give the idea?

To avoid misunderstandings: I am not rudely talking about people's faith. I have nothing against someone believing in Christ, then God, then Allah or whatever they want.

I am against religious institutions. Against men self-defining the voice of divinities.

Those folks are ambitious and want power!

So, by definition, what's the more effective way to keep the power for themselves? Control everyone "under" them.

That's why it's IMPOSSIBLE to hope that religion changes its mindset!

Main concept is: HIV positive folks are not, and cannot be, responsible for other people's health.

Yes we can protect others by taking meds. This is one. But if someone really cares for their negative status, they can get all methods to prevent it to change. Not accepting bareback and/or getting on Prep.

In an ideal world, discussing status with stranger would not be a problem. But in this world, homophobia and serophobia are still dominant. So we can't take it lightly.

While with my ex (we were open couple) I didn't. They were my ex's friends and I wanted to avoid discussions.

Now? Undetectable untransmittable, I have embraced it all; I'm planning to open the couple with my current partner but the condition is, I want to be upfront.

Rejection? If it is going to happen, fuck it. I feel I have nothing more to lose. I'm turning the fuck 50 years old, this summer will be the upgrade I think. 

I'm experienced and adult enough, everyone around me knows my status, I think I have nothing to fear about.

IMHO we should stop judging and labeling ourselves when it concerns sexuality.

Everyone of us should behave as they feel, without chasing (pun NOT intended!) social expectations. 

Like the one "gays are not made for romance" or the opposite "love is love"

or, that if you have a kink, you must necessarily search for others.

My thought is simple: experimentation is the key of human evolution; without curiosity and experimenting, we would never have discovered anything, starting from fire.

But after this, it's not mandatory to be hypersexual, or to always search for new experiences.

You can be extra-kinky even being monogamous, or you can be super-vanilla with no regular sex partners

always assuming that those labels make really sense.

I honestly have many, many doubts on his loyalty towards our community.

First of all, we always are considered sinners. So, reasoning from the religious point of view, there is a welcoming behaviour on Earth, which is needed to guide you through the inevitable hell.

Like someone caressing your head and saying "poor unlucky puppy!" Simply fuck off!

Unlike previous church's communication, this Francis has been very, very good in talking. Like placing the right dose of sugar, around a very bitter pill.

His goal was to bring more people close to the church and he might have managed to do it.

Anyways, being a rationalist, I never trust what a religious leader says regarding matters which are obstacled by religion. Because religions will NEVER accept sex freedom.

Having people sexually free around them, makes religion's power become useless, needless. And religion is basically CONTROL.

So let me say: the pope? He died? Cemeteries are full of unreplaceable people. 

Do I hate him? No, not him in particular. I hate church ideology. In general. But let me say, I 100 percent respect his discussions about peace.

On 4/16/2025 at 6:12 AM, rapazsolitario said:

This is so good, I hope he gets fucked next chapter

We must be patient, honey! 😘🔥☣️

that's how a good boy must behave!

8 minutes ago, btm4bbrn1 said:

Let me know if there’s any interest to keep this going!

Of course yes - this guy must convert and become his gifter's pride ...and the college slut

Wow! Super-hot, to be pozzed together! Go on with it - they need to be looked after, during conversion!

PS I see several new stories here, I need to read them all! My concentration is back to normal

IMHO some people are sexually repressed and find excuses.

Ass to mouth is one part of sex but it has not to be considered mandatory. Consent. Despite my deep intimacy with my guy, we never do it if we are not properly clean inside.

Depends on our mood. For my guy and I, it's an intimacy demonstration. 

It's part of our afterplay, yes, but we don't do it so frequently because my guy often suffers of micro-lesions in his mouth, anus is the residence of fecal microbes and even being super-clean, it can become an avoidable risk. 

But in some occasions we do it!

And now I am laughing, thinking of an ex I had, who refused to suck after anal sex, for... religious matters.

Always respected others' belief but always laughed when they assume the divinity cares about what we do in our rooms.