Jump to content

PozTalkAuthor

Senior Members
  • Posts

    1,257
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    3

Posts posted by PozTalkAuthor

  1. Yeah, Buddhism is much, much different. But, don't you know about Soka Gakkai? A Japanese cult claiming themselves buddhists but as far as I have read about, they've nothing to do with it. 

     

    Btw, for my own way of thinking, a single divinity is the image some human beings have of themselves. What made me upset was even to know that Japan, till not too long ago, believed their Emperor was a kind of god. So...

    Sorry guys, but I'm quite fascinated by this kind of topics, at least until they don't turn into conflicts. I prefer to discuss and know, rather than share ancestral scare which brings up nothing.

    I always refer to a Latin motto when something concerns religions. Ancients said "divide et impera". It means "cause divisions, and you'll dominate". 

    • Like 1
  2. 4 minutes ago, 50latinos said:

    The highly improbable event of a western European country turning into a islamic fundamentalist nation is as scary and undesirable as the less improbable event that the US turns into the fundamentalist christian nation that the psychotic christian right is hoping to achieve with their support for Trump.

    I see no difference between the fundamentalist christian approach of government and muslim extremism. All the hope and dreams of the christian right: banning same sex marriages and abortions, death-penaly-o-rama, war on education, etc sound exactly like what they have in Iran. 

     

    Same thought. Christian and  Islam. The two most important monotheistic religions are like this when their representants become extremists. About Jewish and Buddhists I know less, but the world is full of people, and full of cults - I do not fault the religion in general, but the men behind it. A male character (divinity and/or prophet) imposing humanity what it's right and what it's wrong, through a human -male, of course-, who claims himself to represent the superior being. 

    Yes, I think India has the same, China has no religion but they're an autocracy as well, one-man bigtechs are wishing to do the same... Who said Elon? Me. 

    So, we must all be aware of universal values, human rights should not have any religion. And hoping fundamentalists Christian believers can defend us from Islam (or vice-versa) is like... Like what? Setting our house on fire to defend ourselves from winter's low temperatures 🔥🔥🔥🔥

    • Like 1
    • Downvote 1
  3. Yes I do. I'm scared about islamic laws, countries where dissidents are tortured and killed, where you are OBLIGED to believe in their religion or you'll be jailed. 

    Or worse - lapidated LGBT folks and whatever. 

    No, I'm not phobic against single Muslim observants, but about Islamic culture being merged with politics. 

     

    Am I scared about Christians too? Yes. Because religion gives, practically, infinite power to a politician who feels the direct representant of their religion's divinity. So, what humans say, has no longer reason to be taken into considerations. 

    We have many of those in Europe, who claim to defend us all from Islamic autocracies... proposing theirs. 

    • Like 3
    • Upvote 3
  4. Super! Longing to see chapter 2! 

    Mistakes? I'm not native English speaker as well, but in the end we are a community and it's nice to support each other, in case. Possible haters and grammar-nazis? Send them to f-off ASAP! 

    And, as for having to do with super-conservative catholics... Those who are homophobic till death, they'd deserve to be repeatedly stealthed.

     

    • Like 1
  5. Fuck, honey you're just making me relax after a hard day at work

    I'm just longing for you to continue this tale

    ...Still glad to that night last winter, where I was sleepless and you kept me company dirty talking.

  6. I mostly agree with you, we don't need saviors. The white saving the black, the neg saving the poz, and so on.

    On the other side, it's very very important to maintain respect for each other. Insults related to race, status, gender or whatever goes beyond "transgression". 

    And this is a reason why I'm thinking longer before publishing next part of my own "our status, our state" story: the state's president was insulting poz folks and the virus was instigating them to destroy the stage where president was talking, until he was surrounded and guess the end.

    But, being angry with politics myself, is not a valid reason to publish something similar. Transgression is a thing, disrespect is another. 

     

  7. Two "v"'s: Versatile and Verbal. That's my role in sex life. As top and as bottom I love to be verbal during sex, and my partner as well; truth be told, before me he wasn't into speaking while fucking it was me to introduce him.

    What kind of verbal? I can't say it, not being in the back room; that's the roleplay part but I generally talk about property/ownership, and roles reverse when he's the top.

    Of course it depends on the event - if it's lovemaking or it's pure lust! 

     

    Situation has not happened recently, but having sex with a non-confident person, partially or totally stranger, inhibits my verbal attitude and for me talking is part of sexual pleasure. 

  8. 23 minutes ago, Scanbu said:

    Take your time. It's better to get the story right than to rush

    I agree, but I also hate to make readers wait for too long. Matter of respect, but real life has the biggest priority. 

    In a site like this, people tend to read many stories at a time, given that it's mostly used for our own sexual pleasure and a plot might be forgotten.

    But I love to write, regardless of what others can do with my story. They could even spit on the keyboard thinking how a horrible writer I am - free to do whatever, the keyboard is yours, not my duty to repair LOL

     

  9. Sorry folks, it's taking longer than expected. I really wished to have this plot's conclusion for the end of April but I do not manage to; another project is taking all my free time and I arrive almost dead at night. I'll do my best to have next part for the end of next week but can't promise.

  10. Sorry I missed part 51. But let me say this: last part could be an alternative beginning rather than an end. With Will getting scared at first, imagining what gay life would be, then returning to Dominic (or vice-versa) next week. 

    I love how it ended in part 50, your part 51 might be a new beginning or an allusion to a spin-off

    • Like 1
  11. Always upfront with partner, not with fuckbuddies (regular or not). But this is the past.

    Now I'm partially out, at least "relevant" people know it, so I have nothing to lose any longer if someone says "he's HIV positive".

    This discussion comes in the right moment as today I've planned to meet a former fuckbuddy; he was regular when I still was in the (open) relationship with my ex. Now it's since 2022 I haven't had sex with other men! 

    The guy just knows we're a serodiscordant couple but has no idea (yet) about who the poz is, and I've been conflicted. 

    I'm undetectable and status is not relevant, what stops me is the fear he would get angry and say "you should have told me years ago".

    We'll see how the discussion evolves and if we're going to play! My personal opinion is that we do NOT have to feel obliged to come out with our status, it's not something that others have the right to know - especially if it's a short encounter or anyways a person we have no other relationship with.

    Health is our OWN responsibility and protect themselves is negs' duty. We are already busy to take care of ours. 

    In a stigma-free world, status should be like "I'm blond, I'm tall, I'm short..." but in _this_ world our own protection has priority. 

    I've read a story where a man had to demonstrate he didn't transmit HIV, to the judge. Because authorities didn't know about UEqualsU and they arrested him (house arrest) for deliberate damage. Because he told his status to the woman a day AFTER they had unprotected sex. That's my only fear now, but for the rest, people could go fuck off.

    I head out to work. Bye.

    • Like 1
  12. Unfortunately there are people whose purpose in life is criticizing and humiliating others. Be it free writing, or free software, a blog or any volunteer activity. They feel that it's free and it must have a higher .quality than bigtech/big-authors.

    There are many people who aren't native English speakers, I'm among them; but if years ago they were completely excluded from participating, now machines help non-native to better interact with the world around them! But machines make evident mistakes so, if you know the language you can correct it by hand before posting (like I always do) while if you don't know, you just let it go.

    I am for complete inclusion in this world so if someone wants to share their sexual stories despite little English knowledge, we have no right to exclude them, but let's rather HELP them.

    I remember once a guy who wanted to write text by hand, not knowing English so well; in a rimming shene he wrote "language" instead of "tongue" because the word in neo-latin languages is the same -Italian-French-Spanish, lingua-langue-lengua).

    In this case services can help too, it's called REVERSO CONTEXT so, why not sharing knowledge? "Sharing is caring" doesn't involve the virus only! LOL

     

    In my opinion, learning thanks to erotic fiction or generally topics of interest, is a funny way to improve our skills. This world is already full of people building walls, barriers and fighting wars. 

     

    As for criticism to plots, erotic fiction is like other kinds of fiction. Everyone has their tastes.

    I personally have learnt to read them all, it's a chance to explore new fantasies and know each other's boundaries if you have a partner or fuckbuddies you can trust in.

    How could I say "I'm not into watersports" if I didn't try them? But I would behave as judgmental if I didn't read stories about it trying to understand which kind of pleasure it gives.

    Have I found something disturbing, here? Of course, an author describing a scene where the top/dominant broke fingers to the bottom. In another story, the bottom drank and the top enjoyed him vomit. 

    Those particular things disturbed me a lot, and so? What's next? 

    I simply closed the browser and went to read something else.

    Have I received critics? Yes, a couple guys expressed their opinion quite brutally about a story of mine and I simply sent them to fuck off and find something better in life. I don't care about them and keep on writing in free time and easy mood.

    Haters won't win. Not from my part. We, authors, should form a network against them, supporting each other in case of heavy hate speech. Community makes it better! 

    • Like 3
    • Upvote 1
  13. No, fuck, I can't believe it at all!

    I woke up just what, 30 minutes ago, with a vivid dream memory. A wet dream, where my probably soon-to-be fuckbuddy would have texted me saying "you foolish, I know you're the poz one, we sexted here on breeding zone since July 2022 and had no guts to say who I was. Stop your meds please and do what you told me you wanted to do in messages"

    And now, I open breeding zone finding a story like this, very similar...

    I even can't say it's my virus talking to you and vice-versa, as you're neg!

     

    Now waiting for part2 with conversion, if any. 

    Fuck, I must get up and have an unplanned sheet change! 

    • Like 1
    • Piggy 1
  14. 50 minutes ago, PozBearWI said:

    The politician are representative of us; so it is both us and the politicians.  

    And indeed our problems are typically experienced locally, but similar unrest is ubiquitous to all of our species.  

     

    Yeah, that's it: into a democracy, you vote the person or group who best represents your way of thinking. 

    But if there are two candidates and one is worst than the other, you choose the one closer to your ideas, running the risk of a fail. 

    I'd lie saying that some figures aren't carismatic and have a good ability to attract masses. But they seem to talk to your instinct, not your head! 

    Politicians represent us, it's true but in this particular moment it's very difficult. If you vote and the election goes to the opposite side, you don't feel represented; if you vote, your candidate succeeds, and doesn't do what they promised doing rather the opposite? You're screwed.

    If you don't vote because you don't feel represented by anyone? You submit to others' decision and, guess... you're screwed again. 

    Talking about liberals and conservatives, I hardly define myself totally liberal. And I'm far from conservative! 

    For example I'd accept to prohibit Internet access to haters and fake-news spreaders. I'd introduce a sort of "driving license" for the net, which should be updated every 6 months to be able to actively participate in social media, and so on.

    But it's practically BULLSHIT as if a politician gets it, they can have their own criteria to decide what and if, it becomes censorship and it's the end. This kind of mindset is the one sponsoring autocracy, so even talking like this in theory, having seen the worst of the worst around me, I'd stay much much far from people promising such stuff. 

  15. Let me say that I'm fed up about all of this "binarism" in reasoning. Computers are programmed to get "zero" as false, "one" as true; but human race? Why? Saying "if you're gay you can't be republican" or vice-versa, yes. Most republican politicians are homophobic, but what do you do if current democrat politicians have a weaker position about conflicts, for example? This world is mad, unstable, because every one feels to be in the right side of history. 

    Sorry I might sound complicated, I'm a little feverish

    Life is complex, and we can't say a person is bad or nice labelling their political orientation. 

    With this, though, I feel uncomfortable seeing there are LGBT people addressed towards politicians who are homophobic.

    Not for people's ideas BEYOND sexuality, but because it means choosing the least relevant damage for the country you live in. "He's homophobic but is promising to do his best to stop war" for example...

    It's not the politician, it's the world going more and more crazy. Then, promises are election campaign promises! And believe me, here in Europe we are not better than you in the US. 

    • Upvote 1
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Guidelines. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.