hungry_hole

I constantly think of sex but I don't think of myself as a sex addict. I jerk-off at least twice a day, some days up to 5 times. I simply think of myself as someone who enjoys sex. An addiction would have to interfere with my daily lfe and job.

I've left the door of my apartment unlocked and had a couple oif guys come in and fucked me. I'd had a private gloryhole and I had sucked and got fucked by guys whom I've never seen or could recognize.

I think that we men can be nasty pigs without affecting other aspects of life, with the exception of health. Women can't afford to be sluts without loosing their reputation.

...[in the 70's Sex] must have been so liberating and so free. But as strange as it seems it's almost ass if HIV was a balancer to control or suppress the sex. It doesn't make sense "why" a suppressor would be needed and that's really an unexplained answer. But that goes into other areas as well.

Some religious leaders use this line of thought but I think that it's more a matter of statistics and also circumstancial. Men who have sex with men are free to explore sex in a more "masculine" way without the many restrictions imposed by women. There's no one there to set limits on the number of partners one can have. Men in the 70's had so much sex with so many partners that it made it easy for the virus to spread. What would have sex between men be without HIV?

Sex between men is mostly recreational and without other purpose than to have fun. Sex for most men is not for the persue of relationships or for making babies, or for showing that you love someone. Nothing of that. Sex for liberated men is like a sport where the purpose is to have fun together with other men.

I jump on any dick and I don't care who fucks me. Unless they can't get it up or it's not hard enough to go in. I've taken loads from big guys and some quite old, but with a hard-on and willing to fuck. I've taken great loads from older unatractive guys.

I know others disagree but I make a distinction between 1) casual anonymous sex and 2) dating/relationships.

I make the same distinction and in my opinion stealthing is OK in anonymous situations. Why? Because in anonymous situation we are cocks and holes and that's all it counts. Plus in anonymous situations there's the fantasies and fetishes in which lying could be part of the experience.

However, in a dating or relationship situation stealthing is a different story and then lying about status becomes an ethical issue for me.

I would recommend to HIV-neg guys who want to bareback and who want to remain neg to stay away from anonymous cocks and holes.

...However, if there was a bottom bent over in a bath house or bookstore, i wouldnt think twice about breeding him regardless of status. if he is bent over and public then he is asking for it.

I agree with TxBBTop in that in anonymous settings anything goes and in my opinion not disclosing or lying about status is not even unethical. On the other hand, when two guys treat each other as people and not as a cock or a hole, disclosure and honesty are relevant.

I know a lot of the thrill of barebacking comes from both the risk, particularly of HIV, and the transgression of cultural taboos (against promiscuity, condom use, etc.)...

But here we are forgeting the aspect of barebacking that "it feels good"...it feels better for the top and for the bottom. And then there's the fetish for cum, just for cum, not for poz cump. Again, for most tops it's nice to cream a hole and for bottoms, to get our hole creamed. I think that the risk just adds another dimension. Before AIDS all sex between men was bareback.

This is a sore subject for me. I believe that if you're poz, you have a responsibility to disclose your status every time you are about to bareback...

For me it depends on the circumstances. In places of sexual fantasy and for having sex I don't expect the truth about anything. Good examples of these places are saunas/bathhouses, sex clubs, boookstores, darkrooms, etc.

Now the real fun begins.

My last HIV test was less than 6 month ago and it was still HIV-neg. Without being knowingly poz I feel free to do whatever I want and some times I go to the sauna and behave like a complete slut, without ever saying no to a load. My fun began long time ago, more than 15 years ago when I decided I was a bareback bottom and I was going to freely enjoy being a bareback bottom slut. And it's been a LOT of fun!

I have difficulty understanding why many believe one must first seroconvert before you can start having serious fun.

I was at the sauna yesterday, rented the sling room. I had seen this hot guy before, nice cock, very nice body 30's, total bottom, I had whore-him out before in that same sauna and sling room.

This same "total bareback bottom" came into my room, perhaps turned-on by a glow-in-the dark sign ("raw hole") that could be seen from the hallway. As he walked in my semi-dark room and saw me lying on the sling, black leather hood on, with white shorts with a hole encircled by glow in the dark paint and a sign hanging from the sling just below my hole ("cream this hole"), I guess he got very horny....he stood there for a minute or so watching the scene and stroking his cock underneath his towel, then walked over in front of my hole and started to fuck me. He pulled out a few times saying that he didn't want to cum yet and I was afraid he would leave. But I guess this "total bottom" was too horny and really wanted to fuck my hole. He began to fuck me harder and I knew that load was mine...he moaned and groaned just like most total tops do while they gave me their load. When he pulled out he mumbled at me that he didn't want to cum yet and that he hadn't creamed a hole in years.

A total bottom gave a great fuck and left a nice load in my hole.

I've never used poppers and I hate the smell. But I always have poppers with me at a sauna. I've lost fucks because I didn't have any poppers.

I was just watching the movie "Breeding Ian Jay" and I must say that the idea of seeing definite roles, Ian Jay as 100% bottom, turns me on. If you haven't seen this movie I reccommend it.

I'm also not interested whatsoever in reciprocation, not even in a gloryhole maze because I never stick my cock through the hole. I don't like my cock sucked and not interested in sticking my cock in any hole. Kissing and caressing, yes. Getting my hole rimmed, also yes. But not my cock.

It seems the new norm in today's gay world is being vers. meaning both top and bottom. There is nothing I hate more than fighting over who's on top. I know my place!...

I'm a total bottom, not interested in fucking or getting my cock sucked. Sexually I like sucking and getting fucked bareback. When I search for sex I present myself as a bareback bottom in online profiles and chatrooms. At the sauna I also make obvious my desire to bottom. I really don't care is a guy is total-top, versatile, total bottom, or combinations of these. When we get together he is "my top" at that moment, and to be honest when I get fucked they all feel like total tops.

I was once at a sauna in my room and the few times I was cruising the hallways I saw a tattoed bottom in his room offering his hole. Later that night this same bottom as he went by my room and saw me in position, a hole in my shorts, a sign "cream my hole", without saying a word he came into my room, fucked me barebacked, pumped a load deep in my ass, and left. He felt to me like a total top and that's all I care.

What topme is saying would be a problem to me if I didn't make my role clear from the start.

The worst is when a guy insists in fucking only with a condom but can't get the cock hard enough to put on the condom. That's when I tell him to slide his cock in my hole raw.

I like it when a top cums fast, especially in a sauna sitaution. When the door of my room is open I like when a guy comes in, fucks me, quickly cums and then leaves, without a word spoken.

I agree with MascMountainMan in that the host has to set up the rules. I must be the only bottom when I setup a group or gangbang at my place. I don't want other bottoms having "accidents" at my place. The other guys can touch and suck each other but no anal but with my hole. It sounds reasonable without sounding self-centered.

If two guys are fucking at a sauna I don't see anything wrong with playing with them unless the object. I like to touch the cock as it goes in and out the hole to know if they are fucking bareback. And I'm sure other men do it for the same reason.

In my opinion at a sauna anything goes. I say this because I've been with tops fucking a bottom on a sling, and from behind I touch their tits or we kiss. And they love it. I've stuck a couple of fingers on the top's hole and played with his hole until he comes.

At a private house, which I think AlphaMale is describing, everyone should have the right to set their limits. In this case the limit is to be left alone, not to be distracted with additional stimulation other then the cock going in and out. The proper etiquette is that "No" means no and this should also hold true at the saunas and other public places.

... be able to find total strangers and new tricks online within a few minutes of logging in to whatever site I chose to be a slut on that day. I don't say this to sound stuckup, and stared at this paragraph for awhile thinking that it really does make me sound like an ass. That's not what I want to do, but I'm just trying to put things in perspective to put the whole story in context.

Two things come to mind.

(1) I know many guys are not into guys in their 20's but we all have to recongnize that it's easier for a guy in his 20's to get tricks than for a 40+ or a 50+. So the poster does not have to apologize for being stuckup. He's attractive to many simply because he's young. The trick is to keep that appeal as you grow older. Young guys usually don't realize that their youth is what's attractive to others.

(2) " but I'm just trying to put things in perspective to put the whole story in context." This is a point that I agree with. It sometimes bothers me to read this forum because we know so little about the members...most members here have no age or other details that are sometimes important to me when I read what one of the members is writing. Something is said or an experience is told but we know nothing about the guy posting it. Is he a bear? Or a twink? Or a muscle guy? To me it's important to know a bit about the porter in oder to put the "story in context".

The advantage of a bottom having a loose hole is that he can always tighten it on demand, which is not the case with a vagina.

As a bottom who can loosen his hole I decide what I do with it. When the cock is coming in, I try loosening up to make it easier for the top. When the cock is going in I think any top would prefer a looser hole rather than having to struggle pushing the cock in. Once the cock has gone in and because I have control of the muscles that control the tightness of my hole, I play with my hole and listen to the top's feedback, that is his grunts and moans as well as a few words. I get good feedback when I tighten my hole, but I also hear the enjoyment of the top when I loosen up and he's able to dig in deep. If I realize the top is close to shooting but I want to prolong the pounding, I open up wide.

But when I always open my hole wide is when the top begins to shoot his load. In my opinion, no top (or maybe only a few, and I'd like to hear from them) wants a tight hole while breeding it because most guys' cocks become too sensitive. By opening my hole wide at the moment of the breeding I notice that if the top needs more friction he simply digs in deeper, whcih is nice because it means he's breeding me deep. With a tight hole many tops even pull out because the friction is too much.

In my opinion, because a loose hole can be made tighter and a tight hole is always tight, I go for the looser hole. At least that's why I offer my tops.

I know some men feel they are different from the "normal man" so they call themselves gay. This is not my case because I just think of myself as a being horny man and sex with men is more fun. But, what is the gay community?

Well, I'm back from Santiago, Chile after having stayed at Hung Latin Dom's place. I had a great time, had lots of sex in different places. If you are travelling to Santiago you should consider staying here

Walking distance from Hung Latin Dom's apartment are the following places for sex:

-A dark Cinema 4 blocks away,

-Cyber cafe 1 block away on the other side of the street,

-Another cyber cafe with gloryholes and a darkroom 2 blocks away,

-Sauna Metro with a series of dark areas, gloryholes and a public sling 3 bloicks away,

-Sauna 282 open 24 hrs on weekends 10 mins walk,

-A park 2 blocks away with lots of sex at night,

-And most importantly, because of the location it was very easy to hook up with guys while staying at Hung Latin Dom's place because it's right smack in the middle of the gay area of Santiago.

it helps a lot to know the language because most Chileans' knowledge of English is limited. But Hung Latin Dom can help you out if you don't have a clue of Spanish.

all i want to do is suck as many cocks and possible and get fucked by many different dudes

I've had groups at my place but yes, they are difficult to organize. I much prefer to find a busy time at the local sauna with a darkroom or darker play area and gloryholes. I like to stay late, wait for guys after bars close. Home parties can be fun but frustrating too.

It's true, no matter how many guys fuck me and how many loads I take, it's always determined by the number of horny men available. My max has been 12 loads in one night at a sauna, but my most memorable one has been taking 5 loads while on a sling, wearing a black leather hood and a pair of shorts with a hole as a circle with glow-in-the-dark paint, all of this in a dark room, with only 2 small blacklights.

I was on the sling for 2 hours and only five men decided to fuck me and cream my hole. I was satisfied with the experience but I would have gladly taken more loads from anonymous guys while on the sling.

...which London club/sauna has the most grotty/ugly/old trolls, I love being fucked by guys who can't get it anywhere else because it makes me feel even more worthless...

I know that this site, unlike BarebackRT, is mainly a discussion site and not a hook-up site so most profiles are incomplete. But it would help to know a bit more about Rangerone09 in order to provide him with advice. Is Rangerone09 a 22-yo hunk, ripped body, great bubble ass, sexy smile? Or is he a grotty/ugly/old troll? Or something in between?

I rarely cum at the sauna or with a top. Most likely I will just jerk-off at home, feeling a few loads in my hole.

Well, I'm also away from home and staying in Santiago, Chile in HungLatinDoms' apartment that I rented from him for the month of March.

I have had a great time in Santiago. There is a Cyber Cafe with glo9ryholes and a darkroom just 2 blocks ago. The sauna Metro is also 2 blocks away. Last Monday I was at this sauna from 6pm until 9pm and I spent most of the time laying on a very comfortable sling they have. Took 5 loads from guys and then walked back to the apartment just 2 blocks away. I'll have to go again.

I get tested about every 6 months and I will have to definitely get tested again after my trip to Chile. Pretty wild sex in Santiago.

I'll be staying here on my trip to Santiago next week. I'm sure I'll have a good time while in Santiago. From what I've heard, there are many places for sex and a ton of horny Chileans.