Kimberley

Many are weird for the society.. used condoms, STD cocks, unwashed smegma cocks, dirty female feet, used tampons and sanitary pads

I like cumplay a lot and have swallow many used anonymous filled condoms..

Once a guy had a jar for me with more then 70 loads defrozen out of the fridge, his own cum and from others who also cummed in the jar and some collected used condoms. he loaded my ass up with the whole jar and fucked me.. well the whole couch, floor and myself were full of cum.. after it i licked the cum off the floor

i have sucked unwashed smegma cocks and licked unwashed woman cunts, my gag reflex tells unwashed cunts are definately more smellier 😉

it's not weird to love the smell of dirty womans cunts, i was loving it since my 12th when i smelled my moms used pantie out of the laundy basket.. smell of unwashed sweaty cunt, urine, sometimes dried cum if she was creampied by 1 of her fuckbuddy's. she was very hairy downunder, that makes the smell even stronger.

i also have this fetish for unwashed cocks as well, especially smegma cocks. i prefer this types of cocks above fresh clean ones where there is nothing to smell and taste

That's definitely cum.. no any other lube or fluid slides so good as semen. you can experience it after you taken a few loads, and the more guys cum in you how more slippery it gets

I can relate.. when my mom passed away i was in a big depression and started to fuck bare all day 7 days a week with random guys from the internet to give myself a better feeling. taking more and more risk each day and before i knew i was a STD chaser..

A guy who asked for a condom on the moment we going to fuck..🥴

we had make a date online for a bare cumdump session, so i told him i didn't have condoms because i'm a bareback slut, then he asked if i was tested and had no STD's, i really didn't know if i had something or not at that time and wasn't even care too because he could read in my profile that i was seeking for bare loads so i told him that i was clean, after some thinking finally he was ok with my answer and his cock was slided in me.. 

I always get doxycycline 100mg 2x daily for 7 days when have anal Chlamydia

On 3/10/2023 at 1:40 AM, BootmanLA said:

If you have rectal chlamydia, it most definitely can be spread by sex, period. You could spread it topping, or to another top by bottoming for him while you have an active infection. 

My doctor told me i could not pass anal Chlamydia to other ones because of topping, BUT it is possible when the anus comes in contact with someones dick or cunt. but when that don't happend, a transmission is impossible through my cock or cum. because the infection is not there but in my rectrum

Marc wallace ''in the 90's'' through the period that he gave on purpose false information and faked his HIV neg test in the porn industry and fucked serveral porn stars POZ

22 minutes ago, BarebackBrat said:

PREP would be great but would seem impossible to keep from my wife. 

How you gonna deal with ur wife when u need treatment for STDs or worse HIV? apart from the fact that you can infect your wife as well

6 minutes ago, DarkroomTaker said:

Selfish, You know I need to put you on block. You are such a selfish person who is let loose in the community spreading knowingly your STIs. It not about Judging its about being socially Responsible with good morals, obviously you dont have these.

ok, that's fine

6 minutes ago, ronnie4u said:

YES !  YES !  more Fucking !

i'm not ashamed to say i do. there will be always people who judge it, that's fine

Point 1: I think it's for the most sluts hard to refuse a load, also when knowing you got something and be on antibiotics. a guy can text me that he is in the neighborhood and want to dump his load no question ask. think 7 out of 10 sluts would't refuse it. that are the facts

point 2: is the stigma about STD's, almost no one will be actually tell to guys i'm sorry but can't fuck bare now or you need to use a condom because i have a STD. that's not realistic. online we can speak openly about it togheter on a forum, but in real life it's a big difference

9 hours ago, hotguy02 said:

I was so scared at first to get a load in my mouth but I fell in love with it lol.   It's addicting so be careful what you wish for lol.  You'll want more

Same, sucking cock for the first time was already very exciting, he didn't ask a thing and just cum in my mouth unexpected. loved it right away

1 hour ago, Bimarried001 said:

I hear what you are saying. But the reality is this. If you get fucked raw you are putting yourself at risk. I do not know how promiscuous you are but the more men that fuck you raw the more your risk increases. And I’m sorry, it’s your responsibility to protect yourself. 
A guy can think he’s clean but not be. I get fucked by random anon guys all the time so it’s my responsibility to protect myself or to accept the risk. I cannot rely on those random men to be Boy Scouts. Besides, the could’ve been tested 5 days before but fucked 2 other guys before he fucked me.
Bottom line, if you fuck raw you accept the risks.  

This 100%! most of the guys don't ask anything about status or when last tested. i make a date with anonymous guys and within a half hour they arrived at my house and in seconds i already have their cocks bare in my ass not knowing what kind of STD's whe can spread to eachother. that is the risk you take with bareback sex.

there are also men who ask about my status, even when i say i really don't know my status they also come to fuck me raw. sometimes i get a message from those guys they caught something, but still are coming back for more sex.. those ones are the real barebackers that don't give a shit. part of the game. people who are complaining about STD's should really use condoms in the future to protect themselves. don't blame others when playing with fire and you get burned

29 minutes ago, ErosWired said:

You’re not getting it. These diseases are preventable with testing, treatment, awareness and responsible behavior. People don’t have to get them. We keep getting them because there are people among us who promote their spread by not getting tested, not getting treated, not taking steps to become aware of their own health status, and not giving a rat’s ass about anybody but themselves.

You want to tell me that if some sociopathic motherfucker thinks it’s fine to knock me up with his treatment-resistant gono I just need to either shut up and happily take it or always demand a condom from anyone? Fuck that noise. He’s in the wrong. He’s a menace to all of us, and we should not tolerate his dickheadedness.

You have the breathtaking gall to tell me that I have to accept somebody’s STD as the price I have to pay for sex? Let me tell you brother, I have already paid for that goddamn ticket, paid for it nearly with my life, so don’t try to tell me it’s “just part of it”. It’s a fucking enemy at the gate, and if you’re not fighting it, you’re helping it.

in your words people don't have to take prep then either? if everybody would be fair about their positive toxic status? i test every 3 months on std's, and can't do more than that. what i caught between that time i don't know, and easily can spread std's for like 2,5 months or so with bad luck.. so what's the fucking point of that 1 week exposure when on treatment?

1 hour ago, ErosWired said:

“That’s the risk you take” is a piss-poor excuse for doing it deliberately. Here’s the thing: It doesn’t have to be this way. We could be working together, as individuals and as a community, to hugely minimize the spread of these diseases - which are all preventable - and ultimately eliminate them.

But, no.

Some guys’ asses are just “too hungry for cock and cum” for them to be responsible human beings who care about anyone else’s well-being, let alone their own.

Choosing bareback sex does not mean you have to be ‘into the risk’ - some nutcases fetishize the disease risk, but that’s their mental problem. We all have to tolerate the risk because some insist on causing it.

You ask whether the guy you’re fucking knows he’s infected. Clearly, you can’t blame someone for intentionally passing an infection he doesn’t know he has. The way our current communal fucking environment is, there’s no way anyone can be certain if he’s been fucked twice between tests. It could be argued that when I host I intentionally expose other men to risk by offering my multiply-bred cunt to several men in the space of a few hours - and I won’t say that doesn’t trouble my conscience. But the difference is, I never go into that room in the certain knowledge that I present a danger to someone, and if a guy were to fuck me and then say, “I have gono and just knocked you up” nobody else would be getting in me.

Dealing with the reduction in incidental, unintended transmission can be accomplished over time, but not if that effort is constantly undermined by callous, selfish motherfuckers who do it on purpose.

And I cannot believe this even needs to be explained.

Choosing bareback sex does mean you are in risk. end of story. time to use condoms for you i guess. it's absolute an illusion to think you can ban std's out of the game

If you look to the facts HIV does also spread under heterosexual guys and woman. in 2020 were 29% of the new HIV infections under heterosexuals (in the Netherlands) but the numbers are questionable for sure. not all people will say they had also bisexual/gaysexual contacts

6 hours ago, ErosWired said:

It just boggles my mind that there are people here who actually seem to think that there is nothing wrong with knowingly exposing someone to a disease - and worse, that there are people here who know it’s wrong, but do it anyway.

It's a 2 side story. did u ask for it when a guy is fucking you with his STD dick? i don't think so in many cases. was he knowing that he infected you? who will say. i have speak with guys that honestly said they did it on purpose. i can't be even get mad about it either, i take every load, you know on forehand there are guys with std's with them. that's the risk you take when do bareback sex. besides that, most guys all ask for a pre filled cum ass, they know the risk when a bottom is dripping from multiple anonymous loads.. if u are not into the risk then don't do bareback

In my early days as teenager i swallowed my own cum almost every time. can be difficult sometimes if you came, what i did most times is to make a roll when laying on bed on your back so that your cock is right above your mouth just before you cum. mouth open and let it spray.. then you just have to swallow. other solution also can be to cum in a condom, safe it for later when you are horny again to swallow. nowdays i don't mind to lick it out of my hand

Good question for sure. i think the [banned word] about bareback sex was more about ''he has to be HIV positive'' if u did bareback back in the days it was always you are gross and spread HIV around.

but bareback sex in general was never a [banned word] i think. right from the start when i was started chatting on gaychats as a virgin i was literally overwhelmed by the many guys who did bareback and always asked me if i allowed them to bareback my virgin ass. that was quite normal already then. also heard the same thing from others back then that much guys did bareback in darkrooms etc. much inexperienced guys just did under social pressure in the gay community

since prep came available things have change drastically. the whole HIV [banned word] disappeared and it's like almost everyone is doing bareback, also the guys who never did because they where affraid of HIV and bareback was a [banned word] for them. in my own experiences every guy is fucking me bare when they ask about my status and say i'm on prep.

so no, i think not that bareback sex is a [banned word] anymore, and for many never was

Heard from several guys that a staff member from a gloryhole bookstore where i always go in Amsterdam that he had sex with guys upstairs with customers. never caught him, maybe i sucked his dick or he have fucked me through the gloryholes. who would know..

22 minutes ago, nils99-BB said:

And you can take cock anytime without worrying

This.. happend couple of times i had a unexpected sexdate, not take prep that day and ended up with a guy that was barebacking me (both no condoms with us you know how it goes) i thought i can trust that guy. but that is really the most stupid thing you can do to trust someone and thinking it will be alright i can do him without prep. then i thought i really need to switch to daily because this can't happend any longer to take that risk again

1 minute ago, ErosWired said:

I understood your question. It’s the fact that you asked it on the HIV/AIDS & Sexual Health board that prompted me to reply, because your question not only implies that a choice to consciously contract HIV can have a reasonable basis, but opens up a platform for bugchaser and pozzing apologists to make misguided and ill-informed arguments that may lead real people to make real decisions that will cause real consequences in their lives and bring about real suffering. My reply was intended not so much to provide you with an answer as to address its underlying assumptions before they blossomed into something that would cause this thread to have to be moved to the bugchasing forum, as has happened recently.

If you want to dig into the minds and motivations of men predisposed to catching sexually transmitted diseases, I would suggest the more suitable location for inquiry - and where you’re likely to get more robust response of the type you’re looking for - would be in the Backroom.

I was doubting if it belongs to the backroom bugchasing section. it's about prep discussion and the reason behind it to stop with prep. (other reason than just chasing the bug because they want to be poz. don't really read that there