Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

beyond the fact that he had a bit part in one of the Saw sequels as a drug addict in one of the many flashbacks showing Jigsaw before he became Jigsaw, I know nothing! sorry :( and yeah, he is good looking.

I've never seen any of his porn work before though, only chest pictures.

Posted

Google him, you'll find lots of stuff, including interviews and references to a few mainstream and arthouse films.  I'm pretty sure I remember reading something a few years back that he was definitely anti-bareback when it came to porn. He is versatile and has done ws, ff (as a top).

Guest bbbearlover1
Posted

Good questions.  He has, by far, one of the hottest asses on the planet.  Damn.

Posted

Google him, you'll find lots of stuff, including interviews and references to a few mainstream and arthouse films.  I'm pretty sure I remember reading something a few years back that he was definitely anti-bareback when it came to porn. He is versatile and has done ws, ff (as a top).

http://dariusdarius07.tumblr.com/post/137475062828/dariusdarius07-toilets

http://obeythesagat.tumblr.com/archive

http://dariusdarius07.tumblr.com/archive

  • Upvote 1
  • 2 years later...
Posted

I would be willing to bet either that Sagat is undetectable or that he is now on PrEP.

I remember when he first came out, talking about how bareback porn was something he would never do. Back in the day, in 2005, that made sense: Without any knowledge of undetectability never mind PrEP, someone negative filming bareback porn could reasonably expect to seroconvert in short time. If he's undetectable, he does not have to fear infection, similarly if he is now on PrEP. People can change their minds and opinions when facts change around them.

  • Upvote 2
Posted

(I am certainly not François Sagat, but I know that until just a couple of years the idea of having bareback sex outside of certain very restrictive categories would have been impossible. The idea that condomless sex with people whose HIV was being successfully treated to the point of undetectability was not just relatively low-risk but no risk, could actually count as safer sex, shocked me when I first encountered it. PrEP I had first encountered in the context of a Los Angeles Times article talking about how people would take tenofovir before going off on crystal-meth fuelled lost weekends. And yet here I am, someone who has most of his sex condomless with undetectable guys and PrEPsters, and who would like himself to be on PrEP assuming that he is still negative which is probably still a good bet.)

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Guidelines. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.