Getting exposed on the Internet - Outing with name, pics etc.

[stillbreedin]

On 10/7/2019 at 2:25 PM, rawTOP said:

I'd like to hear some discussion on this. I've bought the domains ExposedFags.com and ExposedFag.com, as well as Exposed.men. I'm trying to get a sense for how the niche works. I know it's one of those "edge" cases that a lot of social media sites are skittish about because it can be abused and become revenge porn. I started at Twitter account, @ExposdFags, but I've been really careful not to retweet things unless it's clear the guy is giving consent by holding his ID in the pic, writing his consent on this body, etc.

 

My thinking is I'll set up the site so guys who want to be exposed enter into a literal legally binding contract. It would be a barter arrangement where I get a license to use the images, and they get exposure on my various sites. So each party gets "something of value". I'd require a photo of their ID, and them holding their ID to prove who I'm doing business with guys over 18, and that they photos they submit are of them. The photos of their ID and them holding their IDs can be kept private or distributed. Ditto with their legal name, location, etc. – guys will be able to get the level of exposure they want. Then there would be a monetary fee to cancel the license. The fee would be per image, and the cancellation fee would increase each time they request a batch of images be deleted. That will either discourage guys who aren't serious from submitting their photos, and/or attract cash slaves who want to be abused financially. [Another niche with nuances I've never quite understood.]

 

Question: Exposed Fags is a better name than Exposed Men, right?

Initially I was noticing a lot of cross-dressers labeling themselves exposed fags, and I'm not really interested in supporting cross-dressers – the audience is straight men who I want to avoid. So I thought Exposed Men might be better. But from what I've seen the guys who want to be exposed really identify with the term "fag", so I'm now thinking Exposed Fags is better.

 

Anyway, it's an understatement to say I don't have the time to develop this right now. The UK has been threatening to deploy age verification. If they actually do it, then I'll work on S3XAV.com (my age verification solution for my own sites), and since there's overlap between that project and Exposed Fags then Exposed Fags will get done relatively soon. Otherwise there's a fairly long list of stuff that's more important and it will be 3+ years before I get around to this project.

 

If you have other thoughts on this niche, I'm all ears… Just realize it's gonna be years before I get around to doing anything.

as long as it is a person outing himself/herself that is fine.  i am virulently opposed to outing a person who claims to be str8 unless they have been seen in gay haunts and with other men. then they are fair game.

 

[pattheslut]

I got posted full nude and sucking dick with my clear drivers license. My wife did too. I can't possibly count the number of times I've beat off to that...

[BootmanLA]

8 hours ago, stillbreedin said:

as long as it is a person outing himself/herself that is fine.  i am virulently opposed to outing a person who claims to be str8 unless they have been seen in gay haunts and with other men. then they are fair game.

 

FWIW even then I don't believe in outing such people, unless they are actively trying to harm the LGBT community (or any part of it). We're allowed to pass for straight in most of society but "let our hair down" (metaphorically speaking) among our own kind. At least in my view. 

[Ezslutbottom]

I've exposed myself kinda but never from someone else I've had people say they would wanting compensation but still haven't heard from any family members been to a site called exposedfaggots.com rawtop DM me if you want to know anymore about my encounter

[TallAussieBtm]

On 11/2/2024 at 2:45 PM, BootmanLA said:

FWIW even then I don't believe in outing such people, unless they are actively trying to harm the LGBT community (or any part of it). We're allowed to pass for straight in most of society but "let our hair down" (metaphorically speaking) among our own kind. At least in my view. 

I agree - unless they are actively advocating against the queer community. Then all bets are off and they deserve to be outed and shown up as a hypocrite.

Though, tbh, it often seems in politics and religion that they all know they're hypocrites. And a tearful public apology is sometimes sufficient for them to get back on the anti-lgbt bandwagon!