gwmxyz Posted December 25, 2020 Report Posted December 25, 2020 Is it related in any way to the idea - apologies, I know next to nothing about this and only have it at second hand - that it's not being gay that is the sin, but being fucked? Tops are ok, it's the bottoms who are in really deep trouble. If so, while I'm not sure I understand the reason, the outcome (more tops) is one I love. I realise that I'm probably doing myself no favours in their eyes for saying this. But then, if they're right, things wouldn't be looking too good anyhow. Also, at risk of making it worse still, for a religious teaching, it seems really quite well-informed - ie knowing there are tops and bottoms. The form in my religious tradition was to be lectured about sex by people who'd never actually had any. Usually, anyhow. "well, we're all virgins here" a junior monk once started his talk to the assembled monastic community "speak for yourself, brother" comes a voice from the back. Quote
Recommended Posts