ethics of hooking up with an STI?

[tr4veler]

I just tested positive for rectal chlamydia, and I'm on a 7-day regimen of doxy. Normally, I'd fully abstain during this time, but I was thinking of what the ethics of this actually are if you're cumdumping...like, if you're hosting and people are coming to fuck you, wouldn't they already be accepting the risk of exposure anyway, given the unknown number and source of cocks and cum involved? This is hypothetical...for now...

[blackrobe]

17 hours ago, tr4veler said:

I just tested positive for rectal chlamydia, and I'm on a 7-day regimen of doxy. Normally, I'd fully abstain during this time, but I was thinking of what the ethics of this actually are if you're cumdumping...like, if you're hosting and people are coming to fuck you, wouldn't they already be accepting the risk of exposure anyway, given the unknown number and source of cocks and cum involved? This is hypothetical...for now...

If you're regularly tested, and make that known, the expectation is that you are STI free to the best of your knowledge. The risk to a partner is relatively low.

Failing to disclose that you have an active STI to a partner puts them at very high risk of exposure. These are two very different levels of exposure risk. Hiding the elevated risk to partners puts you on the wrong side of ethical behavior. 

Having an active STI and needing to pause in taking men's dicks and seed until it's gone is not easy for those of us built for that purpose. But it is the ethical thing to do. 

[Safer]

You are sick. Get treated and then play. Thats like deliberately going to a baseball game with the flu.

[Iker80]

Well, the difference between status unknown between testing and knowing you have an STD is like the difference recommending an investment you expect will be fine but has some risk vs recommending one you're very sure will fail. The first one feels fair enough, the second feels not fair.

Edited 10 minutes ago by Iker80