I was watching BBC news this summer, when this supposedly "respectable" political reporter woman called Sarah Smith, made a totally weird comment when covering the Republican convention, This was when Vance had just been unveiled as the VP pick. She finished the coverage of his speech by making a comment suggesting that J.D. Vance's wave looked 'gay'.
She didn't say the word but it's clearly what she was implying. There couldn't have been anything else. It's just so lame. She's a Scottish woman the daughter of a former UK party leader, for those of you who don't know (which will be the vast majority)
I don't have a clip of this, I couldn't find it on YouTube and the BBC don't have long-time availability of their news broadcasts, cause they don't want intelligent folk actually analysing their output and being able to complain in the same way people do about other networks.
BBC news is supposed to be the most "respectable" and "mainstream" form of getting your info. But this woman was making playground insults like a nasty 12-year-old girl. So what about that?
Also, when Vance said something about UK's (painful) relationship with Islam, our now "Deputy Prime Minister" called him "fruity" which also basically means gay.
If it's acceptable for two talentless Eurotrash cows to say or imply this kind of thing, where does that leave us? Calling a bearded man 4,000 miles away a "gay" gives them a giddy thrill to them for some reason...