nanana

What are your kinks and sexual desires? Put them out there. Men are not mind readers. Should you and I explore Our common interests or am I EXACTLY the wrong co-explorer? Give us more of a hint as to who has advantage with you fellow traveler.

It seems not only not that bad but ACtUALLY a good idea to find a slut whore, drive it (or voluntarily export/import it) to a dick(s), and traffick its cunt until the cunt does its chosen and voluntary job no? Three cheers for whores and for the men that voluntarily move the fuckable parts closer to their utility.

Getting divorced and wondering if I should go single if a pimp husband may want to claim me 🙂

Anybody stayed at Hotel DeLuxe or StayPineapple Hotel Rose or Royal Sonesta?

I very much like the "one plausible hypothesis among many" designation. It's just my job to come up with what I think and what I act on, it's not my job to come up with what anyone else thinks and what they act on, and I am not seeking that responsibility. A long time ago, I helped a lady at church install a phone line in her house, and she said something very memorable: "God told us not to judge, but he didn't tell us we had to be stupid." It got a great chuckle out of me but pointed to a more important truth. In her parlance, I would count myself as stupid at some point if I allowed myself to be paralyzed by the unknowables in my efforts to act in a way that aligns to my values. It's not necessary to marshall a long and extensive fact base that includes quotes from people with unknown motives to know that I oppose genocide, assassination, war, people lying to the races, whipping up tribal hatred, misattribution of motives, defense of my loved ones, peace, and prosperity. It's just incumbent upon me to know how to navigate the collection of people who react differently to shared and unshared input. That is fucking complex, so definitely not trying to do others' sense-making for them.

Here are some quick links: Overview: - I think this is the most comprehensive article on the dubious value of the alliance with Israel: [think before following links] https://www.unz.com/factcheck/factcheck-how-israel-killed-the-kennedys/ (BTW, if you are inclined to assess the anti-semitic versus anti-Zionist quotient of this article, you should be or become aware that the author is Jewish.) Israeli theft of US nuclear materials and secrets, JFK opposition to Israeli nuclear program, and Israeli fingerprints on assassination - [think before following links] https://rumble.com/v1a6xdr-numec-how-israel-stole-the-atomic-bomb.html (focuses on the link between the Israeli theft of American nuclear secrets, JFK's opposition to this, and the links to his assassination) - [think before following links] https://www.israellobby.org/numec/ (collection of documents exploring the diversion of nuclear material from Apollo PA and the connection to Israel) - [think before following links] https://husseini.substack.com/p/60-years-ago-jfk-tried-to-stop-the (article discussing the documentation of the dispute between David Ben Gurion and JFK regarding Dimona inspections) - [think before following links] https://www.c-span.org/clip/public-affairs-event/user-clip-jfk-gurion-mossad-dimona/4547313 (from editor of the Letters of JFK) The Samson Option: - [think before following links] https://www.amazon.com/dp/0394570065/ (by Seymour Hersch, also Jewish) USS Liberty Deliberate Attack on US Navy by Israel: - [think before following links] https://www.antiwar.com/blog/2024/12/12/candace-owens-interviews-uss-liberty-attack-survivor/ (primary source, actual interview of US sailor) US Subservient to Israel: - [think before following links] https://www.jeffsachs.org/judge-napolitano/a7pkyknehy2mp4lpzt9wjym5wapk8y (Jeff Sachs, also Jewish) I think with this information you could certainly argue against my hypotheses and assertions that the Israeli alliance is bad news, but you cannot argue that there are no facts supporting it.

You got it Viking, but will take me a minute or two. More on this soon.

This seems like a highly unsupported assertion @TT2025, the Ayatollah actually has over and over BANNED the development of nuclear weapons as unIslamic. Tulsi Gabbard as recently as March 2025 noted that Iran had no nuclear weapons program but instead was developing nuclear FUSION technology, which may be the real threat that the west perceives. In fact Iran has not invaded any country in the past 300 years, maybe even since the Persian Empire, unless you conflate defensive border wars. I am not at all saying that Iran had not developed significant networks of extra-state actors such as Hezbollah etc. and built alliances with other Shia and non-Shia governments. This seems like major projection especially given the imperial records of most western countries with the projectile power to invade or create colonies (US, UK, France, Turkey, etc.), many of which were highly involved in the internal affairs of Iran since at least the dawn of oil. I bet Israel and the US will back them into developing nuclear weapons, especially if this is a false peace and the US and Israel continue trying to Gadaffi the leaders of Iran as they did in the 12-day-war. (Despite this arguably pro-Iranian fact base, I am not a partisan of Iran, merely offering this because this perspective doesn't seem to be naturally manifested here, usually motivated to write to balance the fact base. I would certainly not argue that Iran is free of the all-to-human instincts to over control, operate out of fear, and use violence to protect and potentially to expand. They PALE in comparison to Israel, which was a state born in terrorism (I guess for purposes of the censorship board I have to package this as hypotheses that are not original to me but which are well explored by a variety of pundits whose arguments are littered with citations) sent a letter bomb to President Truman, attacked the USS Liberty on purpose, killed JFK for calling them on their theft of US nuclear secrets and development of their own nuclear program [COME ON GUYS, IF YOU'RE PICKING ON IRAN FOR ITS NUCLEAR PROGRAM, AT LEAST ADMIT THAT ISRAEL HAS AN ILLEGAL NUCLEAR PROGRAM and a stated policy of the Samson Option], killed RFK and patsied a Palestinian (Sirhan Sirhan), and generated $7 trillion plus of US-sponsored mass murder in the middle east to use American blood to destroy their enemies and create an immigration crisis for Europe, and genocided a whole people with US backing. I find it impossible to understand how any American left or right can think that our alliance with Israel has benefitted the US even a smidgeon. Anyone who asserts that the Middle East has meddled in European or American affairs more than the "West" has meddled in its affairs would seem to be unhinged from history.

He’s just another neocon puppet. Hopefully this will be the end of it but I fear It’s just the start. A can of worms…

@PozBearWI, I didn’t see what you saw in Trump the peace-traitor, but I have to eat any words I uttered that expressed any hope and confidence that Trump would come through on his promises to end forever wars. He’s an actor like all politicians, but it makes me super sad to see stupid Zio-slave escalations in the Middle East.

Tops bottoms. Play 🤩

Not meant to be a rhetorical question, but what metrics do you think we could hold Trump accountable for, in terms of keeping his promises (whether you think they are hideous promises or not)? And then, also adding whether the promises are good? Here are some thoughts: 1) Trump has often said he's against war and nation-building and in favor of letting other countries be successful on their own without US money and firearms. Has he said this consistently enough (without at the same time saying the opposite of this) to consider it a "promise"? If so, was it a good promise that will move the country in a better direction? 2) Trump has been pretty clear about illegal immigration. Is this a campaign "promise" that can be measured? A good promise? 3) Trump has been pretty clear that military standards are very low and that improving performance is more important than female and trans participation in the military. Is this a "promise"? A good "promise"? 4) Trump has said he wants to cut spending. Is this a "promise"? A good "promise"? 5) Trump has said he's strongly in favor of free speech? "Promise"? "Good" promise? 6) Make America Healthy Again, promise? good? If not these, are there any other discernible "promises" he has made that can be used to determine success measures?

Sorry @BBBxCumDumpster I was a bit pompous, think your response is fair enough. I think I MAY be naive, but more folks on this site seem to be leftist, so it inflames my desire to push the ship toward middle and find common ground where we can. I spent much of my time on the left and thought the left was closer to justice, so when I began to see the justice in the positions of the right too, I just couldn't unsee it. I appreciate your point that there is mercenary treachery on both sides of the aisle. It's unfortunate that Biden left really no way out of the politicization of government since the only solution was to punish the folks that politicized government, which will have no credibility with the left, because they will - rightly or wrongly - see it as war. Are there any principles left to reclaim in the middle while still removing the corruption and criminalization of government? What neutral third party is in a position to do it? I'm not really following the eugenics garbage point, this feels like massive hyperbole. Can you give an example of what you're referring to? That whole autopen thing is crazy, especially when you realize that according to Jake Tapper, the White House was managing the whole concealment of Biden's mental state. Who knows if Biden had any input into his autopen? What makes anything he signed with an autopen credibly signed?

@BBBxCumDumpster, you may be a good politician but you're no statesman. Give me someone who can create peace and understanding across the mythologies of tribes rather than foment EITHER/OR-ism and selective blindness any day.

but I think my favorite is when a guy grabs my ass without any words or while introducing himself, or slips his hand down my shorts and puts his finger on my hole.

I liked when a guy told me he wanted me slipped down to his base, also liked when a guy said he wanted to leave a load in me and tell everyone I was full of his seed.

Doesn't that have its greatest (and perhaps only, but on shaky ground on the "only" part) manifestation in imprisonment for crimes? Without wishing to defend the US approach to crime, which needs some serious reinvention IMHO, I think a criminal judgement at a stage or federal level precipitates the removal of a variety of "rights" such as voting rights, etc., depending upon the rules of the jurisdiction.

For us pigs, maybe we should be comparing notes on the HOTTEST members of Congress. (congress.gov as dating app?) Here’s a link to headshots: [think before following links] https://www.congress.gov/members?pageSort=name&q={"congress"%3A"119"} Just a few here to seed the list. I like Dan Crenshaw’s pirate look. Brandon Gill’s pretty. Sam Liccardo looks like a nice manly romp. Ritchie Torres looks like a cutie. Gabe Vasquez is a swipe yes! Who else?

I think you have a point @Rillion, but I interpret Trumps crazy talk as having a purpose that bidens crazy talk lacked, it comes across more as a destabilizing negotiating technique, whereas Bidens crazy never advanced negotiations. But I think Smart people might disagree with me and have great insights. But theres definitely something more EFFECTIVE about Trump than Biden, for better or worse (my perspective but enjoy when people see it differently than I)

@versslut you raise a good point (except I dont agree with your views on meat think it’s super healthy with all the caveats @viking8x6 added. What makes you more concerned about RFK Jr than any of the following ex-leaders of US health agencies, ALL of whom went to work for pharma or agribusiness? Do their entanglements just get a free pass? HHS (Department of Health and Human Services): Alex Azar: After serving as HHS Secretary from 2018-2021, Alex Azar became a senior executive in residence at the Miami Herbert Business School. He previously worked at Eli Lilly and Company as President of their U.S. division. FDA (Food and Drug Administration): Patrizia Cavazzoni: Formerly the head of the FDA's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, she became chief medical officer at Pfizer. Scott Gottlieb: After serving as FDA Commissioner from 2017-2019, Scott Gottlieb joined the board of directors of Pfizer. Mark McClellan: Following his time as FDA Commissioner, Mark McClellan served on the board of Johnson & Johnson. Andrew von Eschenbach: This former FDA Commissioner later joined the board of Bausch Health. Margaret Hamburg: After leaving the FDA, Margaret Hamburg became a director at Alnylam Pharmaceuticals. Lester Crawford: He served on the board of Bexion Pharmaceuticalsafter his time as FDA Commissioner. Stephen Hahn: Former FDA Commissioner, Stephen Hahn joined Flagship, a company formation firm that helped create Moderna. USDA (Department of Agriculture): Clifford M. Hardin: After serving as Secretary of Agriculture from 1969-1971, he joined the Purina Corporation. Richard Lyng: Former USDA Secretary, he later formed an agricultural consulting firm, Lyng and Lesher Inc.. NIH (National Institutes of Health): Elias Zerhouni: The former NIH Director joined Boston Pharmaceuticals as the new Chair of its board of directors. CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention): Julie Gerberding: After her tenure as CDC Director, she became an executive vice president at Merck, a large pharmaceutical company.

I would almost hazard to assert (no facts here sweet fact-checkers) that the Buddha himself is not as enlightened as any doctor that happened to exist after a Lucky-Strike doctor, naturally they all learned from the profitable glamorous mistakes of their medical predecessors.

What makes people think that we weren’t bought off to forget the wisdom? @pozbearwi without wishing to make your knowledge from god incorrect what makes you think that we’re on a continuous unsubsidized continuous increase of knowledge? I guess In your mental model all rackets ended in the 1950’s? Yet I’ve seen you describe Trump as a treasonous traitor. So only evil in the past that you perceive stopped in the past and didn’t continue into the now? if our doctors were corruptible 50 years ago and they are now incorruptible what will smokers (or pro-vaxxers or food pyramid advocates or [insert current narcissistic hegemonic health blah-blah-blah here)] in 2075? I think most fans of health modernism imagine that technology will break through our current medical superstitions but it won’t be technology it will be people in whatever year that is current being willing to question the momentary orthodoxy based on whether people are their healthiest or not.

Okay another question. Have we stopped learning such that all mistakes are in the past?

You rock! Thanks for making your thought process clear @PozBearWI

@PozBearWI not that you need my permission but you’re welcome to trust anyone you want. Im having a hard time with your reaction though. Do you think that doctors 50 years ago were fundamentally different in their savvy than current doctors are? Don’t just do a shitty red downvote. Share your wisdom and make me smarter. Or without regard to my smartness at least answer these questions: 1) how do you interpret the medical profession’s willingness to endorse the healthfulness of Lucky Strikes 50 years ago? AND 2) if they were fundamentally different than they are now, what makes them trustworthy now? (Or maybe you smoke Lucky Strikes or own their stock so you perceive wisdom in the doctors who advocated that smokers choose Lucky Strikes for their healthy qualities? I know you have a brain @PozBearWI so can you at least share your insights as to why you think the medical profession is more trustworthy now than during the Lucky Strikes era? (Too much to ask?)