nanana

@harrysmith25 maybe they will eventually realize what a gift diversity of thought is. In the meantime us twats still risk swimming the waters…

I’m from the southern part of east coast America. Southerners are less direct than gods own truth than northeasterners (was so excited to meet northeasterners who could both hold truthfulness and love in their hearts). But Southerners who wish to be real have a nice communication technology for saying both truth and expressing compassion: no ed cure worked for him not cialis not viagra not horny goat weed BLESS HIS HEART (the technology part of it being to affix BLESS HIS HEART to the less-than-uplifting insight, taking the word “technology” back to a synchronicity of the invention of the abacus. It was a nice way to express reality and compassion and a wish that we are all in gods hands but a suspicion that god would give some but not all of us handjobs. Before we give up on this site we should fuck an incel.

I think You have a point Rillion. Does your point apply to other social media platforms or are you asserting that X is unique in that respect?

If you're into latex, just get a body suit with holes designed in for your mouth, your cock, and your ass. Fuck condoms. The only really good condom is a human condom with its own reservoir deep in its guts.

@SDCumPup since you are able to form this opinion it implies that you DO know how to read or understand scientific reports. If you’d be willing to show us an example of how RFK Jr misinterpreted a report and how you could correctly interpret it, your insight would rise above the level of an ad hominem attack, which is a rhetorical approach people use when they put down the person without addressing the substance of the argument. Since is painfully obvious to you, would you be willing to give an example? It would be helpful for those of us for whom it’s not as obvious. Thanks in advance, NaNaNa

What are your thoughts about this quote. Does it resonate? Does it repel? Does it partly resonate and partly repel? Is truth “nice”? Is “nice” truth?

You do realize that X is a billion people with diverse worldviews? I’m having a hard time understanding how you’d distrust X sort of like distrusting that your email didn’t change a’s into e’s. Can you help me understand how you’d distrust something as transparent as e-mail? Agree that many of the billion with X accounts might not be trustworthy but it feels like drowned baby in bathwater.

I don’t dislike this point… AND another observable quality is that he seems to TIMEBOX his campaigns and MOVE ON when no quick win emerges.

I never listen to Fox. Here are some references to the ActBlue controversy: [think before following links] https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/potential-actblue-criminal-charges-over-possible-fraud-donations-once-again-reveal-the-dems-fraud-campaign/ar-AA1qQv0D; [think before following links] https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/05/us/politics/actblue-democrat-fundraising-resignations.html?searchResultPosition=1;[think before following links] https://www.iowaattorneygeneral.gov/newsroom/attorney-general-bird-demands-proof-from-actblue-over-concerns-of-illegal-donations-that-may-influen; [think before following links] https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/04/breaking-exclusive-corrupt-and-criminal-democrat-party-receives-half-its-donations-from-unemployed-who-are-likely-elderly-voters-whose-identities-are-stolen-wheres-the-money-really-coming-from/ ; [think before following links] https://www.zerohedge.com/political/actblue-tightens-donation-security-requirements-amid-investigations; I think you have a great point though PozBearWI in that people of different political persuasions find it difficult to stomach the editorial styles and spins from various sources of reporting and typically gravitate to sources that OMIT coverage of news unfavorable to their readers' worldview. I think this is true of ANY partisan editorial board, from the New York Times, NPR and the US AID-Funded Politico to FOX, Wall Street Journal and the Gateway Pundit. Both major parties' partisans miss out on a balanced view of the truth. Despite my best efforts, after seeing so many omissions from liberal leaning sources, I am more likely to get into the non-liberal sources, but to your point PosBearWI, that puts me at risk of being pulled into a bubble. I think I am as subject to anyone else is to propaganda and failing to kick the tires of a source. To help me combat that, I try to go to the sources of information to see whether my interpretation is the same as or similar to the reporter's interpretation or the editorial source's information. Frankly, that takes a FUCKLOAD of time, so I certainly don't blame people if they accept things at face value from a trusted source just to protect their time commitment. I also try to read a diversity of sources and hopefully to find contradictory viewpoints to help me asses and triangulate the truth value of what I am hearing or reading. I also assess how much "data" is being presented as opposed to how much "assertion" is happening in the article. Most "objective" and even "partisan" sources find it difficult to avoid all assertion, and all get a different percentage of data versus assertions in the mix. I try to assess the logic of the article. I also try to "follow the money" to try to get a sense of who may be benefiting from the spin, the omission, or the focus. It's definitely a messy world. I don't begrudge people coming to different conclusions than I do and placing different truth value on different sources. PozBearWI, whatever conclusion you come to about ActBlue, I don't get the sense from your question to me "@nanana reading your reply above has me thinking maybe fox is all you listen to?" that you were even aware that ActBlue was being investigated, which makes me think you rely on sources that limit your access to full information. So, what sources do you rely on to get your complete picture? (I ask respectfully and not to win an argument. It would not make me happy @PozBearWI to impose a worldview on you...).

Not probably too surprisingly, I have a different view of this. While I share some of the folks’ concerns about what I think Trump’s unconstitutional actions against free speech (e.g., deporting “anti-Zionists”), I would consider the ActBlue fraud, the almost treasonous efforts by Democrat superdelegates and Nina Jankowicz to encourage Europe to shut down free speech via the Digital Services Act, and the self-enrichment of Democratic leaders and their families on a par with any accusations the Democrats make about Republicans. In one aspect, I recognize the Democratic Party that huntnhole describes, but only in the ideals it espouses and not in its actual performance, which is appallingly corrupt. I look forward to the day when Democrats are able to mount an honest critique of their ugly baby.

There is no pain. Pain is just weakness leaving the body.

Greetings fellow barebackers: I remember seeing a video about global contest to take the most loads, the World's Hungriest Cumhole Contest, sponsored by Bareback Jack. I think there was an intention to turn it into an annual event, sort of like the Westminster Kennel Club's Annual Dog Show, but somehow I think this never happened. Does anyone know of any organizations that sponsor cumhole contests or similar competitions? Thanks in advance for your domain knowledge. Best, NaNaNa

Okay so am I the only faggot who thought he had a great ass?

Nice to hear your views SDCumPup. What you just described though is a legalistic interpretation that would bind future generations slavishly to some past decision. I personally am not bound to some past decision just because some dead or superannuated person forgot to add a clause. Thank goodness Senator Johnson is sponsoring an inquiry into 911 Truth.

Oops maybe I’ll get suspended.

Nixon was set up by Deep State operatives because he was going soft on Viet Nam and China.

Some doctors are phenomenal communicators and are able to integrate their expertise and their humanity and tell a credible humble grokable explanation of why they are making a recommendation. Unfortunately, many are not. Furthermore, being aware of their rhetorical (and maybe ethical) limitations, many fall back into their expertise to try to over generate trust in their recommendations. Even furthermore, the amount of detail to master in any one subject is so great that everything involving experts becomes a trust game. So, the real question is, WHAT makes a medical professional trustworthy?

P.S. the first Paragraph or two are such delicious writing that I don’t even CARE if I agree OR disagree with the author, who has given me such a brain erection that I want His cum.

Thanks for the lead TT2025. Here’s one of many links to the essay to make it a bit easier to find: [think before following links] http://fs2.american.edu/dfagel/www/Philosophers/Berlin/Berlin_twoconceptsofliberty.pdf

huntnhole, thanks for sharing your views. without wishing to imply that there is ever an either/or, I don't (completely) relate to what you wrote. I think what you wrote resonates with a part of the truth, but for me the real reason the empire consensus is collapsing is because America really can't afford it anymore. we are living on the most imaginary credit, and the lower classes of america have seen their purchasing power destroyed. I think it is somewhat mean-spirited to make our deplorables wrong for feeling the pain of our empire-collapse first. we have had faulty accounting for years; our military industrial complex has paid the lowest possible bribes for civilian benefits to ensure that we overspend on MICIMATT, and our lower classes are totally burnt out on subsidizing this. (not saying that our "deplorables" aren't subject to propaganda that is going to encourage them to advocate for stupid non-universal policies). while "progressive" values are not bad, most "progressives" don't know anything about accounting. our overseas beneficiaries have gotten complacent letting the US be the bad guy and overspend on its military while Europe eats its beautiful farm-to-table food. I am not ENTIRELY happy about the empire crumbling. It looks as if America (the T Admin) is ready to exploit other countries for mineral rights and other semi-abusive relationships. It looks as if a lot of new rackets are being spun up (not yet completely understandable, but certainly visible in their emergence). does anyone here really think US money is best spent on killing people in the Middle East? I think that both Biden and Trump agreed that it may have been a good idea for US industry to build plants overseas, but I think they also would agree its a BAD idea to have shut down local industry. Maybe Europe will wake up and reclaim its power to protect itself, energize itself, figure out how to be friends with US, Russia, China, India, Iran, etc., and stop voting for parties that wish to make it a Eunuch. Maybe the US will remember how to be self-sufficient and celebrate other countries who can do the same. IMHO Best.

Im surprised someone hasn't manufactured a semen scented marker yet.

Hi Tallslenderguy, As I hope you know, I appreciate you and your way of thinking. Though we are currently likely to have different views, I do not wish to debate your views, as in my mental model, it is probably best for the planet that we have people with very different views who are capable of jumping in and saving the day from the last set of leaders with incomplete insights. While you raise an important distinction, I am concerned about this line of reasoning though because it posits that there are only TWO types of people who should gravitate into CAMPS instead of promiscuously shifting alliances depending upon the issue. This quality of being righteous that you distinguish in "fundamentalists" is a quality I have found on both the right and the left. There is another critical distinction in this space: I may be a "fundamentalist" about the way I live but not believe it is my role to impose my views and ways of being on others. (My sister is somewhat like this, her heart is loving, her conversations are very comfortable, AND for her the only way is the way of Jesus.) Similarly, I have found that "open-mindedness" sometimes manifests as lazy-mindedness when it comes to getting any deep insights about the pain points of different tribes we are doomed (or blessed) to coexist with. I run into both open-minded and close-minded people on both the right and the left and share your preference for open-mindedness, though I have come to have a respect for people who hold fast to principles, and I see that it gives them some strengths as well as some weaknesses. This may be a major simplification, but I personally have a hard time understanding why sodomites and fundamentalists cannot coexist if they are capable of minimizing aggression and respecting each other's spaces. In reality it is way too messy since most of us are in multiple, sometimes contradictory tribes. In your example, which may just be a case of having to be efficient with words, you seem to be implying that it is sufficient to classify Trump voters as "fundamentalists" and non-Trump voters as "non-fundamentalist." I bet that I am missing a nuance in what you write, as this would seem to give away all the power you have to convince Trump voters to vote differently next time. (Since we chatted offline before I posted this, I am aware that you liked the distinctions I was adding and agreed that it's okay to think you're right as long as you bring some level of humility to your rightness and some level of peaceful shared space for others to ALSO be right, but please correct me if I mangled your meaning.) Thanks for raising this most interesting topic. Best to you and to all on the site!

Arbitrary rules are super hot 🙂

Hi viking10x10 (a conflation of truths and elongations, exaggeration, hopefully I won't be banned or even suspended for inflation...), A favor to ask. Since the editorial board of this wonderful site puts a high level of trust that its moderators actually have the facts, would you do us all a favor and make your next banning for "false statements and conspiracy theories" transparent and cite your sources? It will help educate those of us that are vulnerable in our mastery of facts and our ability to avoid being prey to "conspiracy theories" and the vicious wolves in sheep's spandex that propound them. It will help us all do a better job of staying on the animal farm. Thanks in advance for any less tortuous path to your truths and coincidence theories... Best, nanana

A WARNING about VPNs in that they may enable geo-restricted access but they are unlikely to provide significant privacy.