nanana

I appreciate the thorough response BootmanLA. You say that the media doesn't steal the country blind, but I would argue that if you look at ownership of the media, you'll find that it all traces back to the same corporations that own our big racket industries, like pharma, or arms, etc. The same people that lobby Congress for special status and tax loopholes. Whether or not we agree on that, I appreciate you raising the point, as I realize my point was less than clear. 1. You write, "'love and compassion for themselves' is not a conservative achievement. It's something fully mastered by most children by the age of two," which is good for a laugh, but I think most gays, at least of a certain age, will have had to grapple with having to work through a lot of shaming from conservatives. Now, I think that shaming is much more likely to come from woke people who are on a mission to shame the world into agreeing with them. I wish them all a little more self-love and confidence to exist in a highly diverse world filled with people who will never be woke clones. 2. You're assuming that most redistributions in our system go from the rich to the poor, but I think there's a huge redistribution to the rich from inflation, which their investments can outlast. I wish I had the source, but I read that the working class has had over $50T diverted away from them over the past 50 years thanks to Inflation, which is much more devastating to the poor than to the rich, and using fake money to pay for war and welfare wrecks the middle class and robs the poor of what little independence they have. 3. I see we have some common ground on the empire issue. I don't disagree with your point about NATO, but I do not see a credible threat to the American homeland, and I think we unnecessarily antagonize a huge number of enemies by maintaining 800 bases encircling those who don't submit to our control. We also encourage a lot of local bullies. 4. I tend to agree, but I think the left doesn't seem to notice how much worse health inflation has been since the government got involved, and also how much a thinking medical profession has been replaced by central-government bureaucratic protocols that dumb down our doctors, make them order takers, and raise expense unnecessarily. Agreed that there is a lot of corporate welfare in this space that drives up costs. 6. I don't disagree with your point that a different party might gut the teeth of a regulatory agency, but it is INCREDIBLY PREDICTABLE that government changes hands every 4-12 years, so a bit of foresight would have seen that coming. 7. I agree that our two parties like to gerrymander and rig the elections. I think from what you are writing that you would agree with me that Congresspeople OFTEN are out of line with their constituencies. I don't think this is true of only conservative representatives, but on that we may not agree. 8. On this point we DEFINITELY don't agree. Government is mostly in the business of turning rights into privileges and pretending to grant things. This is more akin to a protection racket than a true grantor of rights. I don't necessarily disagree with you that the founders may have been under the presumption that they were "granting" things, but that in my view is a hideously arrogant assumption. 9. I don't share your interpretation of this point. Unfortunately, I see the government misallocating capital, corporations shifting attention from real problems, and profiteering. The green industry racket has outgrown any "fossil fuel" racket, while I am pretty sure real environmental destruction continues at a massive scale while being ignored by the activists chasing the shiny penny issue. I do think that like "liberals," "conservatives" are a diverse bunch. I agree that social conservatives are likely to want to act as nannies, and I think the overturning of Roe versus Wade really makes your point here. I think that libertarian conservatives or economic conservatives are much less likely to act in the way you describe. I tend to agree that we will have to make a less than ideal choice that favors either Democrats or Republicans. Good luck to all in making choices that further a world we can all thrive in.

This is a great topic as it seems to create a lot of passion, which can be very exciting to the brain and to other nether regions. With respect to all, I am one of those folks who used to count myself as a liberal libertarian (the freedom to take cum and love who I loved) but who has moved to the libertarian right (the freedom from government abuse) after seeing my trust abused by the uniparty, which channels discord to sow partisanship as a distraction from the fact that it works together against most Americans' and non-Americans' interests. I used to trust the left to oppose war and corporate fraud, and now I think the left has either lost its muscle in this space or else never had it. I would concede that there are important differences between liberals and conservatives, but the political media magnifies and dramatizes the differences while stealing the country blind. It also creates an atmosphere in which it is unsafe to order a la carte from a partially liberal and partially conservative menu and forces partisans to see a deranged worst in each other. I appreciate the values of socialists who want to help others, but I am completely over the tendency to help others by running through other people’s money. Typically the great majority of people you might imagine are "privileged" are nowhere near as privileged as you think they are. If 51% of the people voted that you should kill people, would you do it? or do you have any ethical basis for action? I think there are good people in both major parties, and I think each of the parties has decent points, but both are led by grifters who leave me with little faith that either a Republican or a Democratic platform can address the issues I care about: 1. As much as I respect the liberals for their compassion for the poor, I respect the conservatives for also having some love and compassion for themselves and opposing the woke call to self-annihilate. 2. I don’t respect the left’s view that the stored value of the hard labor of others amounts to a good pirating opportunity. 3. An out-of-control empire that needs to end 4. Out-of-control spending that is destroying common people’s savings and shifting more power to the elites 5. I think the liberals are fooling themselves that they can value people while supporting mass censorship of all who disagree with them (leftists are also censored, and conservatives sometimes ignore this). it is disappointing to see so many free people crave approval from government experts and unable to value the contributions of generalists to the collection of valuable insights. I doubt that the kid who could tell the emperor had no clothes needed a certification or a degree to discern the emperor’s nudity. 6. It is sad that liberals have not noticed that all government agencies are captured by the special interests they were created to moderate in the public interest. yet often liberals just want more government. 7. it is sad that liberals (and sometimes conservatives) think their fellow adult citizens need a nanny and that politicians are good nannies. I find this mentality especially hard to understand on a bareback site. 8. It is sad that liberals have forgotten that government doesn’t create rights. Rights are inherent to sentient beings. The Founders of the country knew that their constitution wasn’t creating rights but instead acknowledging pre-existing rights endowed by the creator. The word "responsibility" doesn’t show up anywhere in the Constitution, 9. A climate agenda that promotes slogans, encourages dogma rather than thought, and undermines innovation 10. People with a mission who need others to glorify their choices instead of creating space for diversity of thought and coexistence. 11. People who have lost their faith in their ability to influence others and instead want the government to make people do things. Although it is not perfect, I think the libertarian approach creates the greatest amount of safe space for radical homosexuals, conservative Mormons, satanists, and video-game addicts. I see no inconsistency in a world that creates maximal space for the differing tribes that inhabit it. It gives both conservatives and liberals a safe space in which to pursue their values in a way that doesn’t eliminate space for others to do their thing. In terms of how I’m voting this year, I hope to find something I can vote for, but I will still vote if all I can find is something to vote against. Happy brain and physical titillations to you all.

Isn’t it time to throw off the fear of cumming in cumholes without curation from big lying pharma? Which along with the censorship industrial complex and the military industrial complex has us all way too beholden to griifters and liars, and will soon have us all begging?

Did Anthony Fauci unnecessarily scare millions of tops and versatiles from happily pumping four decades worth of Gods own blessed sperm into willing versatiles and bottoms just to make big pharma a cool $5T? The patterns of sickness seem to follow drug usage rather than happy absorption of cum…? Or is HIV really that unique virus that makes you sick only after antibodies, and sometimes only 60 years after you contract it, a cool $3K a month for prep, or anti-HiV meds? Billed to the guvment? Thoughts?

Curious if any of you read the book? It would suggest that condoms are useless but avoiding poppers may be wise. Thoughts?

[think before following links] https://web.archive.org/web/20060901194620/[think before following links] http://www.cuteboybbparty.com/loadsfame/loads_of_fame.htm

This is Breeding Zone's best chance of being reviewed in the New York Times Book Review! Great writing, somewhere between Larry Kramer's Faggots, eveningsong, a Sotheby's auction, and a triple-dicking. Go ShoreBoy!