Cutedelicategay

Men who are married and cheat on their wives are pathetic losers. Why would you marry and create a trust relationship and then spread your legs for other men. Will you accept if your wife spreads her legs for random men and took raw cocks? Bisexuality is worst unless consented by the partner and given equal opportunity to do what you are doing. 

With the emotions of starting more intimate sex as in barebacking its like an addiction. Once you get the bliss of raw cock and cum and a strong sexual connection between you and your top there will be no going back. Hence I will recommend you to very strongly consider going on Prep. While you may get infected with STIs they are mostly curable however HIV is not curable. Prep will save your life. If you can take a pill after HIV positive why not before and save your body and health. 

Hard to believe that being fucked by a HIV poz guy will give you the bug. Unless the person doesn't know his status, most HIV poz guys are on meds and undetectable. Taking meds break is disastrous for number of reasons. If it is your fantasy then treat it like one.

A lot of guys nowadays seek out bottoms with tight and and hung cocks. However when asked to define tightness and hung they are unable to answer.

My experience last night with a really hot 🔥 guy. He was looking for a tight and hung bottom. Even though I use dildos to practice my ass grip and I am 8inches cut with low hangers, the guy could not fuck me saying that I have a pretty tight ass for him to pound. He tried to open me up with almost a fist and my dildo but still could not fuck me. I finished riding on his fingers and he blew down my throat.

My question is what is the definition for tight ass and hung cock? I understand that its very subjective however there has to be some standard. Also do any of you bottoms out there face similar dilemma while hooking up? 

The society still draws its morality and values from religious beliefs. While religions defines union between man and woman for procreation there are numerous gay characters in various religious texts. Nevertheless, religious beliefs draws a line for sexual relation between same bloodline. Loving a blood relative is different than having sex. There are numerous reasons behind this thought process which I don't want to get into right now.

Many ethnicities marry consangvenously, however Science has proved that their children are very likely to suffer from genetic disorders.

Hence incest (banned word) is more of a gay fantasy and to some extent porn fantasy. To the question about drawing a line, this is crossing the line. Tomorrow someone will come up with an idea what's wrong in having sex with a pet dog. Afterall the dog is a pet and taken care for and loved. 

I regularly train my ass with a 11x5 dildo. My pleasure spot is about 6 inches deep and hence any cock less than 6 will not do me the pleasure. I am OK with 7in but I am a total slut for 8in +. 

My first anonymous loads (6 loads from 4 people) was on my 15th birthday when my stepfather and brother whored my body. I have mentioned this in my other posts that my step brother took my ass cherry when I was 13yrs and my step father caught us fucking. I became a fuck toy for both of them and they gifted me the first anonymous experience on my 15th birthday including first experience with poppers.

I find guys insisting on condoms hilarious and ignorant. Most STIs spread through oral sex as well. People say that oral sex is less risky which unbelievable since many buddies have contracted oral chlymadia. Any hookup with a stranger has inherent risks anyways and condom is just a false sense of security. My expectations are set before the hookup and I have left half way through on a few occasions when the top wraps up despite being told about raw. I disagree with the belief that bittoms have no say in sex and they are at the disposal of the top's pleasure. In fact tops should appreciate that they are about to access the bottom's most cherished possession. 

Squirt recently sent out a survey asking members of their opinions on how to make Squirt inclusive. Its a no brainer that sex apps and sites should totally discourage people from putting any preferences in their profiles and should do away with their search filters except the area search. When one is looking for sex they should understand or be forced to understand that they need to invest some time looking for a match. Also the block option should force the member to write a message before blocking. The reason these talks about racism are so much discussed in the current perspective is because we as a society have missed the time and opportunity to do away with such behaviors by understanding. Its time to now enforce rules for people who still hide their racial attitudes behind preferences. 

This has been an interesting read. However the gay community has been deeply entrenched in relating themselves with fashionistas and porn stars. That's the standard we most gays set for themselves. Furthermore it is deeply divided psychologically as in peer pressure in order to belong to a group. Unlike my straight friends I take more time to dress up for a bar outing and that's why this entire feeling for "types" and "preferences". 

When people talk about sexual preferences, which by the way I agree with, how can one exercise such preferences in a dark room of a bathhouse? That's the double standards I am referring to when I wrote the post. 

31 minutes ago, evilqueerpig said:

We're entitled to our preferences, but we need to be respectful.

Agreed with the preference part. Agreed that noone owes me sex. However That's not the case almost 100%. Dating and hookup apps should make their policies clear that words reflecting racism, ageism, body shaming etc should not be allowed. For example I see lot of people writing "noone over xx years" or "no fat guys" or " no asians" or " only whites" etc. There is really no need for certain filters in search option. These things can be discussed very well in private conversations between interested parties. Another observation I have often made in bathhouse type setting is that if an "unwanted"  person enters a group play in public area the entire group slowly disperses. It's so hilarious to watch that. Anyways gay community does work on double standards. 

Off late there is a lot of discussion, protest, rallies across the world regarding systemic racial discrimination. However gay community too is not immune to racism. I have been rejected so many times for being a non white guy. Gay community is full of racism, ageism body shaming cock size shaming etc. Any thoughts on this please?

Reading that STIs numbers are on a rise especially in Montreal post COVID restrictions relaxation, I feel that we as a community have lost a golden chance to eliminate STIs during the lockdown. If we would have stuck to physical distancing including sexual encounters I believe we would have eliminated most of the STIs from our community. What a lost opportunity!!

On 5/26/2017 at 6:45 AM, Princealbert69 said:

A question for bottoms on PREP.  How many loads have you taken (from different guys) and still negative?  If positive, how many loads before the conversion?  Estimates are good, of course.

Isn't it an oxymoronic question for bottoms on Prep and still negative? Of course the drug is designed to keep the person negative. Also there are about 6 or so cases of failure against hundreds of thousands of people using the drug. I will be scared of people who take the drug and if the drug had high failure rate.

On 3/31/2020 at 1:31 AM, timfreo said:

You could have something there. A lot of guys will stop prep while in isolation . Fucking like maniacs when it's over and many won't have gone back on

I have friends who have NOT stopped Prep. They are still taking them as they would want to be protected when this is all over and breeding season starts from day 1.

IMO.....there may be downward trend in HIV and other STIs. Also in lot of cities STI screening has completely stopped. Of course a lot of breeding has ceased too. But I cant imagine once these lockdown measures are over and spring breeding is on in full swing....at that time we may see a lot more HIV and STIs numbers....a lot more than if there would have been no lockdown.

I hope you guys understand the PREP protocol. 

Prep should be continued for 28 days after last breeding encounter. 

Also restarting Prep without a negative result will put you in a situation where your body will get resistant to Truvada in case you were to be positive. This will lead to more Truvada resistant strains. 

OMG....I hope you guys are seeking medical advice before stopping Prep otherwise you will ruin it for everyone. 

On 3/28/2020 at 8:51 AM, justsexnowatl said:

First of all, you have an AMAZING bubble ass!  If I were near you, you MIGHT be the bottom to pull me out of hibernation lol

Love you daddy👄👅 I wish I had the pleasure of receiving your love.....My bubble butt is the best body asset I offer to my lovers and I work hard to keep it as tight, firm and bubbly....I am sure I will dream of you fucking me in my wet dreams.....

I have hard time understanding human behaviour. Gays have bareback sex without fear of HIV infection but scared of coronavirus. Even with the science behind ART risk of infection still exists. Still we in gay community bareback and those getting infected are saying that it's not a death sentence etc. With the same logic coronavirus too is not a death sentence in many individuals except with underlying conditions which is true for HIV as well. Then why is this scare? Just curious that's it. Not interested in starting a debate just sciences please.

A great discussion about the money it costs for HIV medicine. However many of us are poz and there are many on here who wants to be pozzed deliberately. The pharma companies are profiteering off this craze in gay community called bug chasing. If we really kill this fetish of bug chasing where will the pharma companies get their increased profits from. But of course there are so many "preachers" amongst us.....

5 hours ago, viking8x6 said:

Answered the survey for the numbers. As far as my scientific understanding allows (I have a PhD in science, but "medical science" is something of an oxymoron), STIs will increase the chance of PrEP failure, but your chances of HIV seroconversion with PrEP and an STI are still much less than with no STI and no PrEP. To put it bluntly, PrEP is not a sham by any means - it helps whether you have an STI (or a scratch, or other risk factors) or not, but it is not perfect.

As Mary Chapin Carpenter sings, "I Take My Chances" 🙂  Risk and death are both inevitable, so manage your risk to suit your preference.

Unfortunately barebacking is back in sex given prep and u=u. However public nurses are of the opinion that undetectable with STI may increase VL above undetectable numbers. There should be a scientific study done regarding efficacy of Prep working when a prepster is infected by STI. That will prove whether Prep is nearly 99% effective or not as marketed and prescribed. If Prep reduces efficiency with STI and STI are norm due to Prep barebacking then Prep is really a sham at least in my opinion. 

3 hours ago, BB4fking said:

I got herpes years ago while still a consistent user of condoms. Since going on PrEP about 4 years ago I’ve had chlamydia and gonorrhoea dealt with in the usual way. Most recently I had syphilis and had a bad reaction for about 24 hours to the painful injection (flu like symptoms)  and my doctor has scheduled quarterly blood tests as specific follow up (separate to my normal blood/urine tests and throat/rectal swabs required with PrEP). Not sure I understand the question about ‘PrEP failure’ but I understand any failure to be rare and more usually to be linked to user failure to consistently take doses as recommended. 

By Prep failure, I mean to say that if one catches STIs, what are the chances that Prep will fail? I keep reading and hearing that chances of HIV infection increases with STIs. But if this is the cause of Prep failure then Prep will be a sham.

We all know that Prep allows most to engage in bareback sex. With bareback comes STIs. How many times have you contracted  STIs after starting Prep and which ones? How do you deal with them? Do you think contracting STIs while on Prep increases the risk of Prep failure?

1 hour ago, parvenu said:

thanks for the advice guys seems like it was a false positive buy still a hot fantasy, i agree it's more fantasy than reality and i wouldnt try to infect any one

Good that it was false positive. No STIs are worth the fantasy and risk. Immunity goes down like any other infection. Unfortunately there are so many guys within hetero and homo community who think they are invincible to STIs making it difficult for honest thrill seekers.

If I had the powers to legislate then I will really make STIs disclosure a compulsion.

I keep on reading here and elsewhere that a lot of brothers are on Prep and as part of that process, go for regular testing which otherwise would have been procrastinated. In doing so, other STIS are caught on early and treated accordingly. 

As I understand Prep works very well, almost 99% barring a few cases of failure vice the number of guys on Prep. Prep use has been more so in order for guys to enjoy bareback sex. I keep reading that STIs are by products of barebacking. However I am confused that having other STIs increases chances of HIV infection even for guys on Prep. This is totally oxymoronic. The very intent of Prep is to avoid HIV infection from onset. 

Please enlighten us from your knowledge and experience.