BlackDude

1 hour ago, NWUSHorny said:

I've been traveling, and was lucky enough to arrange to have an overnight in Palm Springs Sunday night, I didn't even know that they were celebrating Pride this weekend until I showed up at Club 541 and found the line shaking through the parking lot. I had to wait over an hour to get in, but once I did thing got hot fast, I'm pretty sure I both bred and got bred within 15 minutes of getting in.

When I came up for air after that initial activity, I realized there were 3 familiar faces I knew from Portland bathhouses in the club. One of them is a total bottom pig and I saw him getting fucked a lot, but the other 2 I've never seen have sex, and seemed to be just standing around doing what they always do in Portland, and I had to wonder what the hell they were doing there. I can only hope that it gives them an idea what a true fuck club is for, but my gut tells me they were probably disappointed that their slut shaming and cock blocking doesn't work in places like Palm Springs. None of the 3 were still around at closing time to benefit from the I need to find a fuck before I leave situation, I was able to both give and take a load while in the last 15 minutes they were open.

Ultimately over the 4 hours I was there, I lost count of how many holes I was in and how many poles I had in mine. I know gave 3 loads and think I took 3 loads, and had a ton of fun. 

Good for you. Although you seem to have more sex than me, I did your relaxed attitude toward it in all these posts. It’s a breath of fresh air in the increasingly, female influenced hypergamy if the gay hookup scene.  

Unfortunately there are a lot of gays who “put in airs” in hopes of being seen as the “respectable gay.” All of this in hopes of showing other gays their superiority and to get acceptance from their straight friends.

These people never learn that they are tolerated by straight society either by the compulsion of law or “because it’s the right thing to do.” To 90%, you’re still just a f*****
 

A lot of these men are putting in a front. Deep down they want to fuck but their “image” and ego won’t allow them to have that trophy they believe they deserve (kind of like women). So they just fold their arms and stand in the corner with some pious attitude.

51 minutes ago, BBBxCumDumpster said:

I don't think that is  easy to argue in the least. 

[think before following links] [think before following links] [think before following links] https://shec.ashp.cuny.edu/items/show/1645

[think before following links] [think before following links] https://www.voanews.com/amp/usa_all-about-america_todays-democracy-isnt-exactly-what-wealthy-us-founding-fathers-envisioned/6201097.html

No, it’s pretty easy. 🤣

On 10/25/2024 at 1:36 PM, BBBxCumDumpster said:

Do you really think that the founding fathers intended to return to the oligarchy they had just escaped?  Trump will change the foundation of this country.  He has made it quite clear by boldly plagiarizing noted fascists.  Lately, he is talking about "blood" and "genes"  as being superior or inferior. (Incidently, it was a black physician who debunked that idea AND created the basis for the modern blood bank.) This "man" Trump wants to punish and jail late night comedians for rightfully mocking him. If you slather on clown  make up and don a clown wig, then you're asking for it. But this also points to a thin skinned man, who wants the nation to change and sway to his whims, emotional fits, his rampant lies and accusations and his rapidly declining mental health.  He has accused Harrris of the exact same things he has already done. He is counting on his voters to not fact check to not know history or government as it is. Did the dog eat his homework, his fiscal plan? He is a lazy iĺl-informed, Cliff notes student, a rapist, a convicted felon, a petulant whiner and an aesthetic punchline. I pray he will lose and reap the bitter harvest he has sown.

One could easily argue the founding fathers were textbook oligarchs and would have zero issue with this

15 hours ago, analluv27 said:

I can see the point and the logic of what you’re saying but at the same time saddling up to a party comfortable with white supremest, nazi, And Christian nationalists in their midst with hopes of a place at the table may not be in your best interest. 
Perhaps a start of a third party consisting of black politicians but not going all out for presidential elections but staying at local elections and then building a base up from there?

I don’t think that’s necessary. The LGBT community doesn’t have a separate party neither do illegal immigrants, native Americans, or any other group. Equality can all be done within the current political structure. 
 

I don’t think this is a civics issue. This is just a reckoning of the Democratic Party.for years, they told us they can’t do anything for Black people because it will upset “moderate” voters. And we’re saying fine then you let them vote for you.

14 hours ago, brnbk said:

The United States is squatting on Indian lands, and is thus a major freeloader as well. Ever thought of paying the native American for his stolen lands and gold?

I believe Kamla Harris would make a great president as she embodies ALL of America: She has a black father, an Indian mother, and a Jewish husband and she chose an old(er) white man to be her vice president! Many intelligent and accomplished white women, including Liz Chaney, Melinda Gates etc,  have supported her, and the most influential black woman in America, Oprah Winfrey has given her approval as well.  Even though I am not from the US, as a person of color in Canada, I can see how much she truly loves America and does not discriminate between black and white. Far from being an airhead, she is a very accomplished and intelligent professional woman. 

As far as the Orange Man is concerned, Donald Trump needs to be put in an orange jumpsuit and sent right away to Jail. He will blend in with the rapists and thieves there. 

Hate to tell you, but Oprah Winfrey has little if no influence in the black community for anybody under 60. That’s why her TV show and her network flopped.
 

We left her and her black misandrist agenda back in the 90s. 

14 hours ago, Erik62 said:

Civil rights IS FOR EVERYONE. Just because a person is an alternative colour to black does not mean that they are not entitled too civil rights & NOBODY HAS TAKEN these civil rights from black people. NO WHITE students get the privilege of having set quotas at university like blacks. Whites have to compete with ALL OTHER races. You must think yourself pretty special if you think that ONLY blacks, or is it only you, entitled to civil rights. 

You’re correct, civil right was for everyone. 
 

And let’s not talk about competition. Any mathematical or statistical study will show that it’s less than 1% chance that white Americans would have eight times the wealth more than black families (or 85% of the wealth overall) unless there are outside forces or a system that suppresses competition. The math is simple.

And we are black  Americans are looking for policies to remedy that equation, so the math makes sense

On 10/17/2024 at 6:20 PM, BootmanLA said:

Outdated stereotypes that outsell all other entertainment within the Black community? I must have missed the part where Black people have guns held to their temples and are ordered to buy Beyonce albums and attend Megan Thee Stallion concerts and pour so many billions of dollars into rap and hip hop artistry that. well, some people in the community end up behaving as badly as rich White guys have for centuries.

Like it or not, the Black community wholeheartedly embraces these artists. If they weren't so popular to begin with, politicians like Harris wouldn't be seeking their support to generate enthusiasm and votes.

Point taken, and thank you for at least acknowledging that white liberals are out here doing the civil rights work for the LGBT community (not alone; there are many, many people of color deeply involved in this issue). I'll remind you, though, that a lot of the reason that advances were made in civil rights for Blacks in the 1950's and 1960's was that they convinced a lot of white people to join their cause, so it wasn't just "us vs. them". Demanding - by the people affected - SHOULD have been enough, but it wasn't. The Black civil rights leaders of that era succeeded, in large measure, because they convinced enough White men - who held the power - that a push for equality was the right thing to do, and they did that in part by convincing some of their ardent white supporters to join them in pressuring White politicians to do the right thing.

1. I guess you missed the studies that show  70% of hip-hop records and streams are  attributed to white people. This can easily be verified by Google. So like I said, this is an orchestrated attempt to promote degeneracy as the primary lifestyle and not an exception or form of entertainment on the black community. Beyoncé and Megan Thee Stallion do not represent Black people as a whole or politically. No more than El Chapo or Cardi B represent the Latino community. 

2. This is the game of the Democrats to hold Black people in a perpetual state Of guilt by beating them over the head regarding civil rights legislation that was past 60 years ago.
 

It was not the benevolence of white people that got the civil rights act passed for black people. It was totally self-serving because the same Civil Rights Bill is now used for everyone. Other “minorities” used the righteous cause and case for Black people during Jim Crow to parlay rights over to themselves. Additionally, the US was losing it standing on the world stage for its discrimination and mistreatment of its own citizens.

And let’s not forget the civil rights leaders who were also doing work in the streets. There were thousands of riots and escalating violence All across this country (Watts, Cairo, etc.)which is one of the primary reasons LBJ passed the civil rights act.

1 hour ago, topblkmale said:

So yes I have to be honest and acknowledge that their fight will benefit me as a gay black man. 
 

Will it? 

3 hours ago, Blkmuscbreeder said:

 

@BlackDude Correct me if I'm wrong, but you aren't blaming the Democratic party for sexualizing Black ppl. You're blaming Kamala Harris, a non African American woman, for pandering to African Americans by using outdated stereotypes to appeal to us, correct? 

 

That’s correct. 

8 hours ago, BootmanLA said:

A guy on a website dedicated to condom-free sex with multiple complaints about sexualization. Complaining that a woman takes charge of her sexuality to have a relationship with a Black man and then also complaining when she breaks that off because she married a white man. Pretending that sexualization is limited to black supporters while ignoring the fact that black female performers, in particular, present a generally more sexualized image (and I have no problems with them doing so). Plenty of more staid, less "racy" Black women have been majorly public supporters of Harris, including Patti LaBelle, Kerri Washington, Viola Davis, Niecy Nash... the list goes on and on.

Sure, flashy stars like Cardi B and Beyonce and Megan Thee Stallion are going to get attention when they perform at political events, because THAT'S WHAT THEY DO - they are attention-getters. Don't blame the Democratic Party for the Black community's promotion of liberated, sexually free women as a good thing. Maybe instead ask yourself why you see it as a bad thing.

The “black community” doesn’t promote those performers, records labels do, while not promoting other no sex-based acts. That’s done to dehumanize black women and justify harming them. 

And we’re calling it out. When it’s political season, we don’t want strippers. We won’t policies.

 

8 hours ago, BootmanLA said:

The tone might well have been bad. But he wouldn't have had to say anything at all, if there weren't apparently a significant number of Black men who (for whatever reason) think that it makes sense to vote for anyone other than Harris in this election. Or that it makes sense to withhold their votes, possibly letting Trump win again. 

I just gave 21 reasons as to why we aren’t voting for Kamala

Here are 21 reasons many  Black people will not be voting for the Dems or Kamala Harris this coming election:

Serving as the vice president to Joe Biden, author of the 1994 Crime Bill and best friend of staunch segregationist like a Strom Thurman and Robert Byrd

Performative blackness. This is not a uniform that you can take on and off.

Mitrice Richardson 

Serving in an admiration that argued in the Supreme Court against Miranda rights

Faught to keep nonviolent offenders in jail, so the point she was almost held in contempt of court

Not advocating for the prosecution of Carolyn Bryant. We don’t care how old she was, they’re still profiting Nazi’s

She appears to have no recent public connection to any black men. Husband, children, father (if he’s black).

Not platform injustice for the Tulsa race massacre victims

Using the legacy of the Freedman’s Bank to provide tangible or resources to other groups

Flooding black neighborhoods with illegal immigrants and utilizing the resources for that community to service the immigrants instead of Black people in the community (please don’t try to debunk this the cats out the bag, especially in Chicago)

Targeting black mothers for truancy violations (again this is already proven correct)

democrats believe abortion is an economic strategy for Black people (ask Stacy Abram’s)

Over sexualizing the black community. Anytime they want to talk to Black people they always have to invite sexy red, Megan Thee Stallion, Cardi B or some sort of other over sexualized performer. They don’t do that to any other group.

Promoting a general sexual agenda to pre-pubescent youth. 

Despite being the number one victim of hate crimes, failing to platform a hate crime bill for black Americans similar to the ones proposed for Asians and anti-Semitism.

Continuing a 60 year benign neglect policy by failing to promise, direct tangible benefits to the black community. And she stated she’s not gonna do anything several times.

Serving as the mistress to Willie Brown, a man who proudly stated he wasn’t gonna do anything for Black people because we don’t vote despite all of the evidence to the contrary. Yet he had no problem, providing economic access, and resources to the Asian and LGBT communities. Again and continuation of the benign neglect policy.

Cackling at an innocent black man being sentenced to life in court. By the way, he won $13 million judgment for wrongful conviction

Her association to Black sororities and other Boule affiliated organizations.

Her association with AIPAC, a group who is currently targeting Black members of Congress. They were even caught on tape, saying the biggest threat to them as young Black people. 

She refused to reevaluate cases were proven tampered Evidence was used.

So there you have it. Now no one can claim to not know the reasons why an increasing number of Black people aren’t voting for Kamala Harris. Now a lot of people are going to claim most of that stuff is misinformation, but it can easily be verified through numerous newspaper articles, and news report. That’s the great thing about the Internet.

Now you may not have to like it. You may say Black people should do something akin to slavery, which means put their needs, politics and personal desires aside for the good of everyone else. You may say that we’re Trumpers ( most Black people are not, and the numbers easily verify that).  But that’s fine. We’re OK with that. Ensure you may squeak by yet again in this election, because Donald Trump is such a racist and incompetent candidate. But just know the clock is ticking and it’s going to get increasingly harder each election.

now some of you are going to read that and say I don’t care. But the purpose of that was not to convince just to inform.

22 minutes ago, 50latinos said:

Sorry but if you seriously think that the election of vice president Harris would "emasculate" you humanity, you didn't have much to emasculate in the first place.

That’s a non sequitur. We are referring to Obama’s speech to black men and the tone. 
 

44 minutes ago, BootmanLA said:

8. I believe that electing Kamala Harris is existential-level important, and frankly, anything that drives home that point is key. 

So number 3? Black men need to be a emasculated and sacrifice their humanity for the good of humanity as a whole?

2 hours ago, tallslenderguy said:

Okay, i'm just a liberal mindless puppet (hey, i'm a bottom, i don't mind a hand up my ass), and i know this is from a "fake news" source (ABC, i think they did a particularly good job with the AI Obama on this one). But for those who are not convinced of a vast liberal conspiracy that only they can see, here is the actual speech vs the original article i posted that quoted the speech.  

 

Thank you for posting that. I kind of see it as seven types of people who don’t have a problem with what Obama did.

1. Down in the recesses of your mind, you think Black people should be lucky to be even mentioned. You don’t think that Black people particularly black men, deserve of voice, and then we should just be happy to be here in America and that We’re not all slaves.

2. You don’t think it really matters because  in 2028, black voters are going to be irrelevant anyway 

3. You feel like it needed to be said and it was better if Obama did it because it wouldn’t come off as racist. Which means deep down you don’t have a problem with racism only how it’s delivered.

4. You’re a black person who’s afraid of uncomfortable conversations with your white peers

5. You’re a black person who agrees with Obama, that black men should stop making trouble because this is going to interfere with your interracial, sexual or social access.

6. You are a Democratic “insider”, who is going to personally benefit if they get an office

7. You may be uncomfortable with your own masculinity, so you don’t mind seeing black men, emasculated, and dressed down due to their “toxic masculinity.” These are also people who like the gender warring  politics in the black community. You’re “yas queen” all over X with the black women, but like Kamala Harris, you have no associations with black men in your life at all

2 hours ago, 50latinos said:

I came into this discussion for the title "Not voting because Harris is a woman?" which doesn't even imply that is for black men only. So, as a mixed race men, here are my two cents.

I will vote for vice president Harris because of this menu of two candidates offered by America's major parties, she is by far and away the most qualified to lead this nation. That, and also because Donald Trump is a criminal, a traitor, a moron and corrupt to the core.

So from my perspective I am being offered a chocolate chip cookie named Harris and a piece of shit named Trump. I am not going to be asking about the amount of sugar in the cookie to see if I chose it, believe me, especially not after the helping of shit we had between 1/20/2017 and 1/20/2021. No, sir!

Within the first two sentences of the post, the OP clarified that this post related to Black men.

5 hours ago, BlueSaphir said:

I don’t understand why some guys here want to vote for someone against their  desire to have fun with other guys. Don’t let a party dictate our future to make our lifestyle illegal, be labeled as unnatural, not mentally well. 

Unfortunately, black people don’t have the luxury to put their sexuality first, politics included Some do but they do it at their own peril. 

11 hours ago, topblkmale said:

 

@BlackDude

The Sandman came tap dancing to pull black men offstage.

And I'm not voting for the current VP minstrel show.

 

Yup. We are four years too early. What they thought they were going to do this election is use that same strategy: how do we get most loyal voter based to vote for us without actually having to do anything for my most loyal base? And why not? It’s worked for the last 50 years.

Then when 2028 came, they were gonna flip the bird to us and tell us sorry we don’t need black voters anymore. We have a new set of voters. They were finally going to be able to win elections without Black people. And we’re still not gonna do anything for you, except for now we don’t have to hide it. We’ll just say we have a new constituency.
 

Well,  turns out even a 5 to 10% drop and Black support means a loss for the Democrats. And if they lose this election, expect an avalanche of backlash “new voters“ in black districts. Now the strategy won’t work because unlike Black people who have been foolish, other voting blocks are split down the middle 50-50. They’re going to demand something.
 

so the Democratic Party can deflect and play all the games they want. They can’t win elections without us and if they think they’re going to that day is over.

This post shows part of the problem why black voters (including black women whose support I also waning) are turned off.

This post was about black voters. Instead, we get a bunch of people, mostly dems, deciding there are more important issues to talk about. 
 

And that’s fine. You get get the advocates of those issues to vote. 

29 minutes ago, BootmanLA said:

Of course Black men are allowed to make up their own minds. But the fact is, Harris *is* less favored by Black men than by Black women, and it's worth looking into *why*. And I, for one, frankly can't understand why *any* minority, given Trump's long-seated, well-established, up front and personal antipathy for all but the "token" few of any minority, would support the man. Certainly none of his policies are going to help any but the wealthiest of the wealthy among Black people. Jis unwavering support for the police "knocking heads" and conducting mass arrests - and for upholding convictions even in the face of both exonerating DNA evidence AND inculpatory DNA plus a confession from the actual criminal, ought to give pause to *anyone* concerned with the well-documented history of discriminatory policing in this country.

On the other hand, I'm always willing to learn. So if there's a reason you believe Black men, in particular, should support Trump - one that explains why his support is higher among Black men than Black women - I'm all ears. And I don't mean "Because they like what he says". I mean what, specifically, does he do or does he say that they find appealing?

Just because you don’t support, Kamala Harris doesn’t mean you support Donald Trump. 

This is patently false, and a narrative created to blame black men and hedge their bets in case Kamala loses. Once again, they are trying to create a gender divide in the black community by pandering towards black women. Because in their twisted minds, they think there are some Madea/ big momma and every black family who’s gonna basically sass the black man up real good and drag them by the ears to the polls.
 

Not only is the narrative false, it’s  insulting. Are black men not allowed to make up their own minds without being called misogynistic, uneducated, ill informed, or some other pseudo racist trope? Are white men misogynistic for not voting for Kamala? Or white women races for not voting for Kamala?

and there may be a few loud, black feminist who echo Obama sentiments, mostly because they are misandrists who see black men as a threat to their perceived power in the community, but for the most part, a lot of black women are not falling for this. 

Because lying has been an acceptable practice in the gay community. 

Raegan was keeping defense contractors paid. There is money to be made from fear.

Of course there is a need for a strong military. But history has show Russia didn’t, and still doesn’t, have the best track record when it comes to wars. 

On 9/22/2024 at 10:22 AM, topblkmale said:

 

Are you here because of Janet?

Miss Jackson if you nasty.

 

[think before following links] https://youtu.be/j_Xrt8RwKL8

[think before following links] https://youtu.be/suVr1c_sFmY

On 9/8/2024 at 4:35 PM, topblkmale said:

 

How kind of you to feel sorry for them and desire to help.

I use to fool around with an ex-con from the Bronx in the 90s. He was a thug and a prison bottom.

Advice: place large funds on their commissary before you tell them your gay.

 

Curious why you would advise that?