Lucienblack88
-
Posts
105 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Recent Profile Visitors
8,554 profile views
Lucienblack88's Achievements
-
UK will be blocked early July 😢
Lucienblack88 replied to rawTOP's topic in Tips, Tricks, Rules & Help
This has gotten completely ridiculous and out of hand. -
This is an excellent explanation.
-
@Erik62You’re welcome. I typically don’t get into politics. I’m an independent and have beliefs that are considered liberal and some conservative. I try to be objective as possible, and it seems @BootmanLAstrives for that as well. But, this was an interesting and intelligent discussion.
-
They will likely want a 3rd term for him.
-
This is what the people wanted, to rehire a failed businessman game show host who can barely read and write, and left office with the country in shambles.
-
Yes, it can. Marriage equality is banned in most states’ constitutions. The state bans are currently unenforceable and marriage equality is legal across the board thanks to a Supreme Court ruling 10 years ago, which me and boot man were discussing. He doesn’t think they want to bother to reverse it, even though some of the justices themselves have written clearly that they do and that’s the goal of their beliefs and platform. If that were to happen, there is a federal law that would kick in called respect for marriage act, and places marriage equality back to the states, but they must honor a marriage in another state, even same sex marriages. This law will be challenged most likely and lawsuits are in the works. So, if the 2015 court ruling is reversed and the respect for marriage act struck down, that leaves just a handful of states where marriage equality is legal, and could only be performed. The next step they would ban it all together at the federal level and reinstate marriage law is only opposite sex couples. This is a very realistic scenario. The best thing we have here in the US at federal level is respect for marriage act. It repealed definition of marriage of only to opposite sex couples and protects marriage benefits for same sex couples at federal level. It can also be put into the US federal constitution, but it would need to clear the hurdle of passing being passed by both houses of our congress then pass 3/4 states legislatures to be ratified. It’s very unlikely.
-
As @BootmanLA correctly points out, the American declaration of independence is not a legal document. It’s mostly a list of grievances against the British government by American colonialists. Marriage has historically been a religious function. The US has a division between church and state civil government, unlike most other countries, and certainly like the country we broke away from where the sovereign is head of the State and church. Marriage made its way more into legal category, and is basically a new economic class with state marriage. That is what this all about, having the same financial and other benefits married heteros do. There is no written right or freedom specific to marriage in the US Constitution, but some individual states have put it in their state constitutions.
-
Beeing topped by a younger guy?
Lucienblack88 replied to Ykinkster's topic in Softcore Fetish FICTION
Dom twinks are so fucking sexy. I find them uncommon though opposed to submissive twinks -
Beeing topped by a younger guy?
Lucienblack88 replied to Ykinkster's topic in Softcore Fetish FICTION
Im normally a dom, but I have a regular thing with a 22 year old guy and bottom for him as a sub. Every so often he wants me to top him. Every time he fucks at least 2 loads inside me, sometimes 3 within just couple hours. We always talk about how we love it raw. When we started he used condoms, I didn’t mind bc he’s cute and I was pretty sure I could get him eventually to ditch the condoms. And I did. Yes, daddy on son is hot, and I do that, but I really like the son dominating the daddy aspect as well, it’s different. I love when he puts me in my collar, submitting to someone much younger is very different and sexy. I sometimes imagine and fantasize he’s my son and he’s pumping his old man. -
In your nation and mine, it stems from the same country of origin point. Jolly old England. Much of how American government operates we got from the mother country and the crown .
-
Sadly yes
-
Oh, it was Gorsuch, you’re right. I appreciate you looking up some of this stuff, i forget or just don’t have time. In terms of rule by minority, my point was 51% of the country didn’t want him, and it’s interesting how we can still have a winning minority party to govern the majority. There was a big stink in 2000 about Bush jr legitimacy. There’s been, as you know a movement to abolish the electoral college for some time now. But returning to @rawTOP original premise, i think he has a very real concern that should not be minimized, because according to the conservative manifesto, marriage equality is on the chopping block if it gets to them. I read that lady from Kentucky who refused to issue marriage licenses years back has lawsuits going and the conservative law firm representing her (and funding it all) maintain they have one goal - to get the RFMA to the supreme court and overturned. So, if this happens, the one federal backstop we have or Obergefell is overturned in case that happens, all the LGBTQ who voted for Trump can’t ever, ever complain about their rights being taken away in that regard.
-
You are right about which justices are likely to vote which way. I remember Kavanaugh issued a surprise ruling about defining sex under US law. In terms of textualism, I think and maybe you’ll agree, maybe not, they have departed way from that. I don’t think they can beat that drum any more. There’s nowhere in the founding documents where or suggests the president has immunity, and (I’ll get shit for this one, but even conservative legal scholars have written about it) that aid and comfort in rebellion under the amendment disqualifies a person from holding federal office ever again. The nice thing about the constitution is that it’s adaptation ability to conform to time periods. Textualism advocates annoy because of hypocrisy. Take alcohol prohibition it took away a freedom, the constitution is a blueprint of government and lays out rights, not restrictions. It was misused. Bottom line is this Supreme Court is off the rails and the country doesn’t trust them. 49% of country elected Trump again, minority rule, Thomas will retire, and that lady from Florida has a good chance to replace him. Anyway, i appreciate your thoughts above.
-
This is why I don’t like going into politics. I could go over reach point, one by one, but I’ll just say there is dark money from influencing organizations, you might not agree with it, but Heritage Foundation, Leonard Leo, we now know this goes back decades trying to get Roe overturned. I’ll just end with the Supreme Court needs to be completely overhauled. This court is completely out of control. Justices should be rotated out or something, these idiots are accountable to no one.
