erreth Posted March 30, 2013 Report Share Posted March 30, 2013 So, i really want this hot undetectable guy with a big cock. We've chatted before and he wants to rim me and load me up. I'm just afraid of getting pozzed. What do yall think i should do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
barefootbob Posted March 30, 2013 Report Share Posted March 30, 2013 there are several schools of thought on this board and this one is my own personal opinion: If you are afraid of getting pozzed then don't do it. some believe you can't get it from an undetectable but do you want to risk it, even if it is one in a thousand? this is only a question you can answer, YOU are the one which has to live with the consequences of getting pozzed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators drscorpio Posted March 30, 2013 Moderators Report Share Posted March 30, 2013 If he's really undetectable, the risk of taking his load is very small. If taking any risk at all of being pozzed is too much then rethink your decision to take raw cock and cum. Every bare fuck has some risk. Don't do something you will regret. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 31, 2013 Report Share Posted March 31, 2013 It is your choice, and it should be made by you and with all the information you can gather. As for me, I have on several occasions ben loaded up by undetectable guys (still tested neg here) but I do get checked regularly. I especially have a favorite guy who can get in there deep; we enjoy swapping whenever we can. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pssilverbear Posted March 31, 2013 Report Share Posted March 31, 2013 I agree with bbfuckstik. I've taken several loads from undetectible guys and am still neg. The risk is low but I know that there is still a small risk I am willing to accept. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TigerMilner Posted March 31, 2013 Report Share Posted March 31, 2013 Your risk is less with an undetectable guy on meds than with a guy who doesn't know yet he got pozzed since his last test. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HungLatinDom Posted April 1, 2013 Report Share Posted April 1, 2013 Your risk is less with an undetectable guy on meds than with a guy who doesn't know yet he got pozzed since his last test. I'm surprised at how many people still hasn't got that memo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bearbandit Posted April 1, 2013 Report Share Posted April 1, 2013 I'm surprised at how many people still hasn't got that memo Because if they weren't worrying about HIV they'd be worrying about cancer, or any of a list of obscure, rare diseases? Or the state of their relationship? Or their lack of driving skills? I worked on the government's helpline backing the iceberg ads of 86 and the terror that HIV evoked in people then (ok, it was also a bigger thing then with no treatment)... "But what if I found two 50p pieces and they were stuck together with chewing gum. If some with HIV had been chewing the gum, would would the risk be then?" was one of the saner, less "out there" questions I was asked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
straycowboy Posted April 12, 2013 Report Share Posted April 12, 2013 Because if they weren't worrying about HIV they'd be worrying about cancer, or any of a list of obscure, rare diseases? Or the state of their relationship? Or their lack of driving skills? I worked on the government's helpline backing the iceberg ads of 86 and the terror that HIV evoked in people then (ok, it was also a bigger thing then with no treatment)... "But what if I found two 50p pieces and they were stuck together with chewing gum. If some with HIV had been chewing the gum, would would the risk be then?" was one of the saner, less "out there" questions I was asked. See now, other people's driving skills concern me much more than the dangers of HIV. But thats because, I can get broken bones, and internal injuries, and they be immediately life threatening . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
labtm Posted July 21, 2013 Report Share Posted July 21, 2013 So what was your decision? Did you let the undetectable guy bareback you let him shoot his cum inside of you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
erreth Posted July 22, 2013 Author Report Share Posted July 22, 2013 I've not done it yet. I'm still working the idea around. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ffoz Posted July 22, 2013 Report Share Posted July 22, 2013 I've barebacked a few times over the last few months wanting to become Poz. But, tested Neg last week and now I'm seriously thinking do I really want to become Poz. Nothing, like have cum pumped deep inside you arse, or even swallowing a hot load or two. Seriously, I need to seek help. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest cardoc49 Posted July 22, 2013 Report Share Posted July 22, 2013 I've barebacked a few times over the last few months wanting to become Poz. But, tested Neg last week and now I'm seriously thinking do I really want to become Poz. Nothing, like have cum pumped deep inside you arse, or even swallowing a hot load or two. Seriously, I need to seek help. I think, that bareback is the only way to fuck:-) and I think, that fucking bareback means you have to recognize that you might get infected with HIV And I think, that the only way to handle doubts and anxiety like the ones you describe, is SAFE-SEX-ONLY Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest GoodExercise Posted July 22, 2013 Report Share Posted July 22, 2013 Don't do it. Never let a guy who is honest about being undetectable fuck you bareback even though he probably has one of the least likely cocks on the planet to transmit HIV. Far better to let a guy who is poz and not on meds bareback back after he lies about his status. Or bareback with a newly infected guy who has no clue that he is poz and does not know how infectious he is at the early stage. By all means, only bareback with guys that claim to be neg. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JizzDumpWI Posted July 22, 2013 Report Share Posted July 22, 2013 Ah GoodExercise, sarcasm is alive and well! So true though. Sure, the undetectable guy might have some condition present that might make him less undetectable for a time (cold, STI); but on balance; if safety is the concern; a guy on meds for some period of time is going to be hugely safer than purportedly neg guys. And yet the mindset persists (OMG, he is poz, he is poz)... If one is really concerned about safety from HIV (and in many ways the rash of hard to treat STI's - which scarcely get a nod in this forum) then one should be content with jacking off; and even then, only with clean hands. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now