Why Are Most Escorts Top Only?

[muscmtl]

It seems that any gay male escort with muscle is a strict top! All the guys I see on rentm-n only top, and I don't get it. Seems that as an escort it's a hell of a lot easier to bottom than top (meaning you need to get an erection even if your client is repulsive, and lets face it, drugs to maintain it). I know you can search escort by role, but you can bet that if he is a muscle top, he won't btm, let alone bareback! Guess it is some self esteem shit, where the muscle stud can't handle his ego being double slapped : whore and bottom.

 

Steve

[drscorpio]

I would think that part of the issue is that more people are looking for tops than bottoms in an escort.

 

Most places it seems bottoms outnumber tops. Why would a guy need to pay for a bottom? 

 

I realize that you are looking to do so, but it may just be a matter of supply and demand. 

[GONE]

Why should pay a Top for a bottom- the most offer service for free.

Why should pay a bottom for a Top, because a good Top is rare.

[Guest SBBOY]

It seems that any gay male escort with muscle is a strict top! All the guys I contact on rentm-n only top, and I don't get it. Seems that as an escort it's a hell of a lot easier to bottom than top (meaning you need to get an erection even if your client is repulsive, and lets face it, drugs to maintain it). I know you can search escort by role, but you can bet that if he is a muscle top, he won't btm, let alone bareback! Guess it is some self esteem shit, where the muscle stud can't handle his ego being double slapped : whore and bottom.

 

Steve

 

I'd bottom for you any day!  ; )

[muscmtl]

I do get the supply/demand concept, but I don't think that's what's going on., Plenty of top guys I know have the same issue with top-only escorts. So why pay? I pay for what I can't get for free. Muscle studs that bb bottom are rare, and because of my age and normal dick (they all want 10 inches) I'm not allowed to even fantasize about their ass. It's never been a matter of hole for me, plenty of those up in the air at the bathhouse, the light out in their room so we don't get to see what they look like because if we did, no one would go in. Fucking a hole because it's a hole is not for me. So again, I will pay for what I cannot get for free.

 

I just don't buy this idea that there are more bottoms out there so escorts need to top. I know 2 muscle beef stud bb btm escorts and they get a hell of a lot more, by the order of 10, clients then all the big dick strict top escorts. I still think it's down to the fact that if you muscle/gorgeous/bigdick and you escort then you do it for your ego, which means that you are too hot to bottom.

 

Steve

[bbzh]

Maybe I'm looking at this through the wrong prism, but I've just always assumed that if an escort is willing to take a raw dick (and is open about it), then he probably has things he doesn't even know he's spreading around. Maybe the top bb escorts feel the same way and want to minimise their risk by not getting barebacked even if the customer is willing to pay. (I agree with the above sentiment that there is so much "free" bb ass out here, that there is essentially no market for a bb bottom escort. When I want to top, I can find a raw hole whenever I feel like it.)

 

I think there are also some macho escorts out there who think as long as they don't take dick, then they are not gay. 

 

I'm of the opinion that in the gay world, we focus too much on what we can't have (and get upset about it) instead of focusing on what we can have - because somehow that's just not as exciting. And while money can buy us most things, it won't buy us everything. (Some days I'd be willing to pay to be negative again, but that's another story for another time).

 

I've said it on other threads, but all of these apps and chat lines actually make it HARDER for many of us to get what we're after because there's so much "noise" to cut through. When you had much less choice, you were probably happier. And you could probably "negotiate" a bit better. Nowadays, we're all treated like we're part of a meat catalogue and if you're too direct or say the wrong thing, all it takes is a swipe, delete or a block and you're "dead". 

 

So I say enjoy the two muscle stud beef escorts who will take your cock raw. That's better than zero.

[C10H15N]

Bottoms are free.

[PissPigBrooklyn]

I went to the Rentmen site and searched for muscular escorts, anything goes, bottom, bottom/vers and versatile. I came up with seven bttms. I searched muscular escorts, anything goes, top, top/vers and versatile and came up with six, only one less. Your research appears to be  flawed.

[FelchingPisser]

I have written in my blog about my friend who pays for escorts and includes me in the fun.  We have found MANY porn actors who top him and who bottom for me--always bareback.  Rentmen can help you sort for them.  And yes, even some who say safe only.

[not_sure_bb]

simple supply and demand. IMO, Bottoms will also be more likely to pay for a fucking since a "good top" is hard to come by

[muscmtl]

you are absolutely right and online apps have made it impossible for normal guys to have sex, you are always competing with at least 50 perfect muscle guy who attract all the attention. I do remember the good ol Days but again in the good ol Days you still have your muscle guy that got all the attention,so it's tougher Tuesdays but he was never really easy, the solution Still Remains the Same if you want to do him then you better look as good as him or better

Maybe I'm looking at this through the wrong prism, but I've just always assumed that if an escort is willing to take a raw dick (and is open about it), then he probably has things he doesn't even know he's spreading around. Maybe the top bb escorts feel the same way and want to minimise their risk by not getting barebacked even if the customer is willing to pay. (I agree with the above sentiment that there is so much "free" bb ass out here, that there is essentially no market for a bb bottom escort. When I want to top, I can find a raw hole whenever I feel like it.)

 

I think there are also some macho escorts out there who think as long as they don't take dick, then they are not gay. 

 

I'm of the opinion that in the gay world, we focus too much on what we can't have (and get upset about it) instead of focusing on what we can have - because somehow that's just not as exciting. And while money can buy us most things, it won't buy us everything. (Some days I'd be willing to pay to be negative again, but that's another story for another time).

 

I've said it on other threads, but all of these apps and chat lines actually make it HARDER for many of us to get what we're after because there's so much "noise" to cut through. When you had much less choice, you were probably happier. And you could probably "negotiate" a bit better. Nowadays, we're all treated like we're part of a meat catalogue and if you're too direct or say the wrong thing, all it takes is a swipe, delete or a block and you're "dead". 

 

So I say enjoy the two muscle stud beef escorts who will take your cock raw. That's better than zero.

first thanks for doing this search, I did it myself and I came up with different results, but that's not the point. my experience on rentnebn is that all the guys I'm willing to pay for will only top so maybe there's something flawed with my picking

I went to the Rentmen site and searched for muscular escorts, anything goes, bottom, bottom/vers and versatile. I came up with seven bttms. I searched muscular escorts, anything goes, top, top/vers and versatile and came up with six, only one less. Your research appears to be  flawed.