rawTOP
-
Posts
6,082 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
5
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Gallery
Everything posted by rawTOP
-
I need to know A LOT more information. What browser? What OS? What exactly do you see? When EXACTLY does the problem start? On clicking play? And anything else that may be relevant.
-
Guys, be careful with this site. They're using PayPal which is against PayPal's terms of service. It won't be long until they lose their ability to take payments at which point the site will probably shut down or at a minimum your access to the site may be lost and you could be out some money.
-
The idea of a leather perfume is an oxymoron. Perfumes are an anathema in the leather community. The idea of a butch perfume is just a contradiction in terms. If you want to be butch learn the art of smelling like a man – naturally.
-
Just the opposite. I prefer holes that haven't seen a lot of use. The bottom might complain for the first minute I'm fucking him, but then his hole feels nice and tight.
-
Encountering any problem? Post them here...
rawTOP replied to rawTOP's topic in Tips, Tricks, Rules & Help
See the link in the post just above yours. It explains how to opt-in to parts of the site that are now opt-in only. -
Well, you posted in the right thread. Now I suggest you read the thread and follow the instructions.
-
Here are some scenes where there's a scorpion tattoo on one of the guys… http://www.rawtop.com/porn/bb/scorpion-tattoo This pic was by far the clearest and most dramatic…
-
It's illegal, or at least people can't charge money to view it, so it's unlikely there will be much of it to be found.
-
If you're not familiar with what's going on in Portugal you should take a read… http://www.spiegel.de/international/europe/evaluating-drug-decriminalization-in-portugal-12-years-later-a-891060.html They've decriminalized all types of drugs. Drugs are still illegal, but they're the status of a parking ticket now provided the amounts are under certain levels. And here's a quick run down of the results… We all need to think differently about the drug problem. I know it bugs me to no end all the drug use in the gay community. Initially I put the chem sex section here in part just to segment the conversation. I'm not sure if it does good or harm… It's my hope that through talking about it people put themselves at lower risk or understand the risk they're taking. But I don't know really.
-
Going extinct? I was vers. Then I was a total top. Now I'm more of a vers top. Still sorta hate getting fucked. Enjoy topping a lot more.
-
Agreed, plus drug addicts spend a lot more time having sex than sober people… But, a lot of times drug use comes from other personal issues and with things like family rejection, issues at work, etc. gay men just have a lot more personal issues than straight folk. I'm watching Dexter at the moment and I'm up to the point where he has a kid and he's burning candles at both ends and dropping a lot of balls in the process. The fact that gay guys aren't typically pulled in all directions by family obligations means we can do things that are more "indulgent" and "irresponsible" if we choose to. Drug would be part of that.
-
Evading daddy fucked me bareback
rawTOP replied to gfboy1988's topic in HIV/AIDS & Sexual Health Issues
That's the thing - most poz guys don't have something that's "communicable" - so why should they tell you if you don't ask? I suspect "I'm good" meant "I'm undetectable" and October was the last time his viral load was checked. He probably didn't want to go through HIV 101 with you to explain that the safest person you can have sex with is a poz guy who's on his meds and consistently undetectable. (Actually, the 2nd safest - the safest is a neg guy on PrEP - probably). I also suspect you live in a state which mandates disclosure. Say thank you to your legislators for putting you in a position where the guy felt the need to tell something other than the full truth. -
Those aren't rosebuds. Rosebuds are when the insides of your ass "prolapse" (hang out). Rosebuds look like this... What this thread is about is just puffy ass lips, not a prolapsed hole.
-
As a top I don't see swollen assholes very often, and don't really have a preference. But I get like that when I get fucked, which may sorta prove your theory of "depends on how often you get fucked". BUT, back when I was a twink I was getting fucked fairly often (though not a lot), and I got puffy back then too. Here's a pic of my ass after a photographer fucked me during a shoot for Playguy back in 1991:
-
I'm just wondering why it is that some assholes get puffy and swollen when they get fucked and others stay pretty smooth. Here's an example of what I mean by puffy/swollen (click to enlarge): And here's one that looks like it's been fucked, but isn't puffy/swollen: Anyone know why some assholes get all puffy when they're fucked? Do you tops have a preference?
-
OK, you guys have talked me out of giving teens under 18 limited access to the site. I still think it's a good idea - even a responsible idea - but the powers that be can be rather unreasonable when it comes to teens and their natural impulses for sex - there's no point challenging that structure. If I do anything it'll be down the road and only 18 & 19 year olds will be able to see the 16 & 17 year olds. Since most places have close-age exceptions that should be OK. But again - nothing for now.
-
If you talk to some of the other "founders" of BBBH, the concept is bigger than iBi. I did what I could to include him.
-
I get emails telling my my mailbox is full. They happen once it's full and someone tries to send another message.
-
But all the images of the people in question will be "family friendly" / PG-13. And they won't see anything x-rated of yours. What you're talking about relates to porn. I know the UK is going through some weird shit right now with porn, but it'll pass. I mean the holes in the law are big enough to drive a bus through and the filters are blocking websites belonging to conservative MPs among others. The point is, if it's legal to have sex with the person, then certainly chatting with them and exchanging PG-13 images can't be illegal. That makes no sense.
-
Can you explain what risk you're talking about? I'd limit it to ages that are above the age of consent. I don't get it. The age of consent in the UK is 16. What law could possibly broken? Can you explain further?
-
But my point is that a lot of guys will lie if they are asked to tell their HIV status to a complete stranger. So maybe let those guys loosen things so it only appears to buddies, or to guys of the same HIV status, etc. Telling everyone to disclose doesn't really help if that feels threatening.
-
Got a question for you guys - I want to hear the pros and cons - what pops into your head when you hear something… On BBBH.com I'm thinking of allowing guys who are under 18 to have limited access to the site if they meet the age of consent law in their area. But I'm thinking there should be a minimum age. I don't think I'd want 13 year olds from Comoros on my site. If I did it, guys under 18 would have the following limitations: They could only upload "family friendly" photos of themselves They would only be allowed to see "family friendly" photos of other members They would not see any x-rated banner ads When adults send messages to them there would be a warning that even though they may be legal to have sex with that other laws such as "endangering the welfare of a minor" and transporting minors across state lines may still apply. I'd also put in a feature which would allow users to permanently filter out people below a certain age which guys could use if they have no interest in guys 18 (or under 30 for that matter). COPPA requires parental consent for kids 12 and under to be on websites. There's no way I'd go that low, so I think the most I'd need is for the teen to agree that they won't access the site if doing so would be against the parent's wishes. The reason why I'm considering this is 1) some teens mature early. If it's legal, why not? And 2) I can actually have a safer environment for them than if they lied and said they were 18 since they won't be shown anything x-rated. Which means it's safer for the adults too. I hooked up with one kid a couple years ago who said he was 18 when he was actually 17. That's still legal in NY, but what if it weren't? Better for the adults to know the real age, right? Thoughts?
-
Here are the stats so far… In the past 4 days since I put the opt-in policy in place - 957 users have opted-in for the bug chasing / gift giving areas, 827 have opted-in for groups, and 797 have opted-in for chem sex. Given that 1,758 logged-in members have been on the site in the past 24-hours (and there would be more than that in the past 4 days) - that means that less than half have chosen to see the "backroom" sort of stuff. And even among those who opt-in 17% didn't want to see chem sex stuff. So hopefully people like the site better these days now that you don't see the stuff that bothers you. This sort of strategy - showing people only the stuff they want - is really how I want to move forward with this site and with BBBH.com. I want to be all things to all people - so a vanilla site for vanilla guys and a hardcore bug chasing site for bug chasers. Any thoughts or suggestions on impact of the changes?
-
You're a total cumhole but your profile says Versatile-Bottom
rawTOP replied to hungry_hole's topic in General Discussion
That's my kind of top! I hate getting fucked, but love taking loads. The quicker the better, IMHO. Thing is nearly all the vers bottoms I hookup with just go into bottom mode with me and I never see the top side. But I hope you're not saying that a real top is one who fucks and fucks and fucks. I'm not that kind of top at all. I cum relatively quickly. -
OK, I hear you guys. My plans to sort of deprecate HIV status on BBBH.com are now scrapped simply because some of you live in locations where HIV status is important to disclose. But for the people who lie when they're asked, I'll let people choose to hide their status from certain groups of people. Maybe that'll result in fewer liars.
