raw773

What could go wrong. Nobody gossips in a hospital!

Yikes, for my money, not hot. Little scary.

But hey, you got the load.

On 10/26/2019 at 7:22 AM, hungry_hole said:

From a legal standpoint, HIV+ guys who stealth can be charged and face the law but not in anonymous sex situations: "Judge, I was in my room at the bathhouse offering my hole for anon loads and this guy bred my hole knowing he was HIV+". In anon sex names and addresses are unknown and most likely you'll never see them again. Not enough information for a legal case.

The best legal defense would be "How do know it was MY load?" followed by "Of course I told you in the bathhouse where you took nine other dicks..."

(Genotyping I guess.)

11 hours ago, hntnhole said:

Is the Ram still going strong? 

I hate to get a little off topic. But it is Chicago sex related...

The Ram "A Gay Treasure" was torn down. In fact, so was Little Jim's and almost that entire block. It will be replaced by a six story Howard Brown health center. So instead of getting the clap, you'll get treated for the clap.

Cellblock is not a Latin dance bar. It's a great place that borders on dive status. It smells like... something. Locker room? There's a sling and a lot of nights a guy getting fucked in it.

Love to have you or anybody else when IML rolls around!

3 hours ago, ErosWired said:

It is at the Congress.

Sadly, this hotel really is a dump. Chopped up, overheated, dated, it's just bleak. The event used to rent out legitimately huge and nice hotels. I'm sure there is a reason for the Congress now but as a local, I have actually skipped the event because of the space.

He had a tiny dick, so I flipped it inside out and fucked it.

4 hours ago, ErosWired said:

Holmes felt a wave of consternation - he had deduced beyond any doubt and thus represented to the Magistrate that Mr. Fortescue was the most prolific and reprobate fornicator in all of Cuntbreeding Lane; indeed, a prophylactic stuck to a man’s shoe could mean but one thing. Yet somehow he had overlooked Fortescue’s employment at the condom manufactory.

The dog that didn't bark in the night meets the cock that didn't crow.

35 minutes ago, ErosWired said:

The conclusions drawn by Sherlock Holmes were always portrayed as quite astounding until he explained how they were simply matters of careful observation and logical deduction.

The ol' condom-stuck-to-the-shoe trick worked every time.

...

Maybe not in this crowd. 😅

6 hours ago, fatbottom said:

His excuse was he had got his nipples trapped in a sash window when he was closing it, and had to go to A&E.

Pics.......

On 9/28/2021 at 5:24 AM, jsunpdx said:

Seeing the video recently only made him more convinced that what happened to him was a crime and he would like to hold the people involved responsible and have them answer for what they've done. If anyone has any ideas, please send me a message or reply here. We would both appreciate anything you may have to say to help him move forward with what he wants to do.

The statute of limitations on a civil case ran out. The most obvious tort is battery -- an offensive and unwanted touching. You have 2 years in California.

There's no contract claim to be had on the continued sale and streaming of the video. The contract was: I'll have sex on film, and you'll pay me. That contract was performed. Also, the statute of limitations ran out on that, too.

It's hard to see how any prosecutable crime was committed here. It's not rape if you consent. You can always withdraw consent but in some cases, even an intoxicated person can consent. A jury would have to look at the reasonableness of the performer to continue the sex (by the way, that's who the clearest criminal defendant is: the guy who fucked your friend, not TIM). Going forward with this is a decision left to prosecutors who, as others have said, will not likely jump to prosecute a 10-year-old porn scene when they have plenty of recent crimes to deal with in contexts that aren't so factually murky. Getting evidence and witnesses this much later will be a huge problem.

Blue Bailey is cute and smart. 🙂

I am sorry your friend feels so traumatized and went through the experience. Sometimes the law doesn't provide a remedy and the best thing to do is try to move on. This may be such a case.

5 hours ago, austin_submale said:

I've had no luck on grindr at all.  Nothing but flakes and scammers.

 

As much as it sucks, I've had plenty of great fucks and loads. I don't know how. It's the worst. But it's a great equalizer.

Mine would be any reference to oral when I'm pretty clear I need fucked. I don't want to have to suck you or get sucked -- not to the point where that's the real focus of the engagement. If I wanted to get blown, I would ask for that. To me being a "top" and being somebody who needs a BJ are really different. 😂

I also don't really like to have to describe how it's gonna go. "Tell me what you'll do when I get in you. Oh yeah? Now tell me what sounds you're going to make for me. Yeah? Tell me about..." While I think this can be really hot, I can pretty well tell this is just somebody jerking off rather than wanting fucked.

Let's set a location and a time, and then go.

Since the "what turns tops off" post is getting good feedback, I thought I'd ask the same question to bottoms. What makes you take a pass on a top?

23 hours ago, LetsPOZBreed said:

Telling me you have X number of horny guys over and that you're "looking for more".  If you have that many there and aren't doing anything; I have to wonder what you are really up to (which I know is likely drugs).

"A couple of my friends and I are sitting around looking to get fucked, you can take a turn on all of us!" No thanks. You're high and can't get your little dicks hard or you wouldn't have this problem.

Other complaints: "I WILL ask you to verify your face by Snapchat, FaceTime, etc." What that implies is:

1. I get catfished all the time
2. Because I'm not that smart
3. But also, I'm so hot that I just endlessly attract other super hot profiles

If you're telling me you don't trust me before we even talk, that's OK. I think you're stuck up. 🙂

17 hours ago, fskn said:

The "Tribes" prompt in Grindr suffers from the same ambiguity: is it about the user or about the user's preferred partners?

Nothing makes me hotter than seeing someone in the "Poz tribe" but declaring their status to be "Negative." Tap that ass.

15 hours ago, ErosWired said:

I offer my sex hoping that I’ll be able to give. If that giving means the Top is so pleasured that he climaxes inside me, mission accomplished. If he’s so pleasured that he fucks me in half for an hour without cumming but leaves with a smile, mission accomplished.

I just want to say this is really hot, and I hope I get to fuck you someday. You have the right attitude. And you sound fun.

6 minutes ago, fskn said:

You want more, not less, PrEP access for people who are otherwise likely to get HIV!

Sure. At the population level, it certainly works and it's probably saving lives. At the micro, individual level, though, it's needed because people make selfish choices (I want to have sex with anyone I want and without a condom). Let's be honest with ourselves.

21 hours ago, fskn said:

Uninsured Americans could potentially afford to pay out-of-pocket for the Aurobindo product (just over $1 per daily pill), but the company does not sponsor a patient assistance program.

I'm not following this one... If it sells for $1 a pill (news to me), that's already very cheap. What's the profit? 10 cents? So where does Aurobindo get the money for a patient assistance program?

I mean they'd basically be losing money on it.

To me? I'm not troubled that PrEP costs money. It's a lifestyle drug. Let's be honest. Going bare is a choice. Unless you're being raped, nobody makes you do it. I think those of us making that choice ought to have some skin in the game, and I'm uncomfortable dumping the cost of PrEP on the rest of society.

Well today he pled guilty to a felony and prosecutors will recommend a sentence of 41-51 months. I wonder how hot he's gonna be in four years.

5 hours ago, BottomKyle said:

Gay bottoms, around the time they hit puberty, know exactly what their place is in sex.

I m ean so we're gonna say that at age 13, boys know they're gay and bottoms and that's that. Might as well get on with getting fucked and taking those loads.

This will come as amusing news to the dozens of bottoms I've turned into good tops.

On 8/27/2021 at 3:00 PM, BottomKyle said:

Yes, this class should absolutely normalize unprotected sex and promote barebacking and breeding as an expected part of being a gay bottom of any age.

This is a ridiculous thing to tell a 13-year-old. Go out and change your life, kids!

30 minutes ago, Close2MyBro said:

I used to work for a doctor. He told me Vaseline is exactly what you need to keep moisture locked into the skin surface.

Yeah I'm with @ErosWired
here... Vaseline might be great for SKIN, but the inside of your guts isn't skin. It's mucus membranes. I don't think a nightly Vaseline shot is gonna stretch anything.

I've stretched a lot of manhole. It is a physical process that literally involves stretching. Bigger toys, bigger hands, etc.

6 hours ago, Karl8181 said:

What in your opinion and experience does a sex date mean ? 

1000% a "sex date" is a date and time to meet and have sex.

7 hours ago, Close2MyBro said:

You say this as if you're surprised. Have you read some of the stuff people post in the other forums on this site? There are people out there who are into stealthing.

Naw wait... There's serosorting... there's stealthing... and then -- there's this guy. He's not stealthing. He's not stealthing because he's actually saying "I will convert you, or I won't do it at all."

And he's not getting a lot of action if that's his criteria: (1) negative, (2) not on PrEP, and (3) willing to get converted? That's a tiny, tiny slice of gay dudes. 😂 And most of them are already on this site.

38 minutes ago, BBArchangel said:

When I met this guy for a drink we were hitting it off pretty well. Then out of the blue, he told me he was positive and asked my status. I told him I was on PReP. Thing went in the ditch after that. He was hoping to convert me, and he didn’t have sex with other poz guys -or guys on PReP.

So this was a first. I’ve been rejected for all sorts of reasons, Like everybody else. But because I’m on PReP? Is this a thing, or was this guy just full of bullshit? I’m still scratching my head.

I honestly find it hard to believe this actually happened. It sounds like some of the fantasy happy talk that you get on this site (here come the guys saying "send him my way," etc.).

But I DO BELIEVE YOU. To me, his behavior seems preposterous. You're saying there's a poz psychopath out there who only fucks to convert -- but who also takes the time to ask and make sure he's got an unprotected neg hole on the line. He will get rejected 99% of the time until he kisses the one frog who turns out to be a chaser. That's what's so impossible. Also feel like if this was so important to him, he'd ask earlier in the process.

It leads me to think maybe he used it as a convenient excuse to break it off. Don't know. Honestly it's a headscratcher myself. I wish you well and hope it was not a big dent to your ego. 😕