Jump to content

raw773

Senior Members
  • Posts

    200
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by raw773

  1. On 10/19/2020 at 4:47 AM, Nclchub said:

    It's also possible that he'll be more willing to go bare if you lose your erection while fucking him. Having a good fuck abruptly stop can be the push that convinces people to just ditch the condom (it's what got me to ditch condoms).

    Yeah, that's pretty good advice. I genuinely respect him and his desire to use a condom... at first. Obviously I can't wait to get in him raw when he's encouraged.

  2. Horny as fuck on lockdown so texted a very hot guy in the same boat. Work from home. He's in an "open" relationship.

    In and out in about 7 minutes. Offered to keep my mask on the whole time. I sucked his nice cock, he got me poppered up, and fucked my face against the headboard. Fast and full. I immediately went for ATM because I didn't have time to clean out. Licked and swallowed a little of my own ass snot so he wouldn't be dirty. Done. Home.

    cum.png

    • Like 1
  3. For rather personal reasons, I find myself actually needing to fuck a bottom using a condom. The problem is I haven't used a condom in about 10 years. The idea of doing so is repulsive. I'm really afraid I'm not going to be able to stay hard, the second the latex touches my dick. Obviously I intend to convince him to go bare as soon as possible, but I've got to plow him wrapped first or it'll never happen.

    Does anyone have advice on how to go covered?

  4. 22 hours ago, BootmanLA said:

    No, the nickname for a neighborhood isn't like slavery or discriminatory laws. But the point is, a significant number - a minority, but nonetheless a significant one - found the name exclusionary. And given how that minority - females - have had a long, long history of being excluded from pretty much everywhere that matters; and given that nobody's actually HARMED by changing the name - a name that (as noted) is not particularly grounded in history; it seems to me to be awfully churlish to insist on hanging on to it, even more when it's under the dubious rubric of "women ruining everything".

    Thank you for your comments from Louisiana. As a Chicagoan and Boystown resident, I can tell you that the name change was what was "churlish."

    The "new" name of "Northalsted" is generic to the max. You may not know it, but Halsted is one of our longest streets, and so "Northalsted" could refer to a point anywhere along a 5-mile stretch through DePaul, Goose Island, Greektown, and down to Madison Street. In trying to please this cranky minority and its identity concerns, we've surrendered our own local identity.

    Giving up Boystown in exchange for nothing does matter and was not harmless. The person most publicly associated with the proposal complains that the name minimizes trans womens' roles in the "queer spectrum." But gay men have a strong identity here, stronger than anybody else's -- sorry 'bout it -- and it was wrong to smear us into the alphabet soup of G-L-B-T-Q-I-A-etc. The G's and T's can be here together, but we can honor the T's without dumping out the G's. And if the T's want to have Trans Town, good for them. Our city is well known for its lumpy stew of identities.

    Donna Edwards had a similar argument in the Post recently, when she said people should stop smearing her experience as a Black woman into a larger and supposedly more-friendly "people of color" umbrella identity. I invite you to read it. [think before following links] https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/09/14/we-are-black-women-stop-calling-us-women-color/ It's the same principle. You tarnish each thread's vibrancy when you say it's all just so much of the same fabric.

    For my part, I'm doubling down on Boystown (BBoystown is even better), and I'm with @chibtm2breed on sticking it to our local business community's leadership. If they want to make this change without community support, then see if I support them. It was short-sighted to try to un-name America's most vibrant gay neighborhood, and I have a feeling they'll be coming back soon enough.

    • Like 2
    • Upvote 1
  5. 12 hours ago, Homo60 said:

    Whether designed and engineered by man or by nature, this is what makes the HIV virus such a beautiful and addicting thing, with what seems to be a mind and mission of it's own, first infecting the body of the host, then the mind, with it's need for survival and need to replicate and expand it's domain. Such a beautiful thing in my opinion.

     

    14 hours ago, S6AT6A6N said:

    Viruses and Bacteria, etc, communicate with each other, and most definitely DO affect how we behave, in many a way, including sex, appetite, emotions, etc.

    They are extremely smart, and can be found hiding behind a gel like matrix as to avoid immune system detection, and medication(s). 

     

    12 hours ago, Homo60 said:

    Whether designed and engineered by man or by nature, this is what makes the HIV virus such a beautiful and addicting thing, with what seems to be a mind and mission of it's own, first infecting the body of the host, then the mind, with it's need for survival and need to replicate and expand it's domain. 

    Ugh this is such horseshit. "Gel-like matrix" of genius virus particles? I know this ain't the New England Journal of Medicine, but you guys are on another planet with this. 

    • Like 1
    • Upvote 1
    • Haha 3
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Guidelines. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.