Bwccummer

Main point is some are pushy and actions or words can make myself not want to meet. Then some play games in say traveling and never visit if rare time I do host. The other scenario is was thinking of going to person that host but they were only able to hours later so not work. I shouldn't have to explain when in past had one to meet that I was at half asleep mode in communicate, that if I am not awake I can't give consent. Which is why not meet with that one. I had figured to set one app as away so can sleep. I don't know if option on other apps. Otherwise a pain to logout and sign back in. Also gotten to where know if serious or just playing games. At some point have interest or not in meeting, but can't be sitting around waiting for many can't host or can't travel. Can seem at times one can mow lawn or shovel snow and not feel time wasted be it by someone 50 miles away or 5 miles that not want to host or travel. Many I find they can't travel or don't want to travel far. To put another way I try to be honest, but respectful if not interested.

I take the view gave a legitimate reason for if shovel a lot of snow one too is going to be tired and if one block then is their choice. Also if one can't accept no at moment for not work to meet then accept and move on to someone else. Sometimes things change at moment communicate and if meet would have to be at a different time. The other option is one could pretend to be open to meeting only to find out later not interested and time wasted, which was not wanting to do.

The additional information can share is the one stated like to party which is their own choice but I am inclined to not get a ride from for I dont know what drug may be on that affect their driving. As for being tired, see as a red flag of what the other person says. When they share not care and want to meet and I am asleep, next thing is a crime can happen so I rather meet when I am alert if to meet. I figure a matter of how talks that be inclined to meet or not. So if individual or somehow something not seem right that I be inclined to not meet. An example is share many pictures when not ask for when not want to see pictures right away.

Problem behavior in express wanting to meet. I run into from time to time some that their problem behavior give reason to not want to meet. I chatted with one on grindr that at first seemed promising, however as shared was tired wrote in a rude way to wake up. Then I replied physically tired as was winter and earlier had been outside. Then replied in a way that showed zero understanding or caring. I ended up blocking and reporting to grindr. I try to be honest so my and their time not wasted. Another time on grindr had contacted someone that at first thought maybe could host. Turns out as remember talking confusing in vehicle not running right, but drive to a gas station. I had figured not able to meet and leave at that. However they got insisting on meeting and I shared that was not interested. Then read message about how they not want to take no and said would start going house to house until find me. I then had to say I will call the police, to no longer talk to me and blocked along with report to grindr the individual. I dont know if had meet if ask for money or worse bother me as go about business. Or vehicle work fine and claim car problems to attempt to get money out of me. Then last one remember on grindr is one want to meet as was very late at night and I was sleepy. They want to meet and not wait till later. Made myself uncomfortable for needed to sleep and I guess individual wanted one asleep or near asleep. I didn't meet. I think just blocked. Share for view my safety as more important than a potential fun time. I still remember roommate said something to effect of meet someone even if could potentially end up in trunk of car. Find was a shocking comment to make. I hope he said as a joke but one need to trust instincts and think of safety. Others seem more able to chat with and sometimes meetings not work due to hosting or travel issues, but behave in a respectful way.

As read various replies that wonder if some want to claimed topped, bottomed, or versatile more guys than actually with. For example claim more wild than actually are. They could try to use pictures to claim with a 100 or whatever number of guys, when may only have been with 20 guys total. Also can vary what actually do with guys with. For example some just oral, others oral and top, oral and bottom, versatile, etc. However if deceive or bragging can claim all topped, bottom or versatile as want to tell the story. The pictures can be used as add names to a list or characteristics such as if fit, older, etc.. For if meet Rather do anything sexual or not, can claim did. Then read a profile on a hookup app about how person talk to them used their own photos. That has got to be awkward seeing your own cock picture sent be one claimed to be someone else. I guess can see maybe have concerns not look adequate or if subconscious about cock size, so steal and use a photo of a big cock. I can guess can work other direction if concern cock is too big, use a small or smaller size picture to deceive. However use only as an example for can be other motivation for want pictures. I guess just wish upfront about if interested in meeting or just need jerk off materials.

While websites still around noticed many websites webpages taken down so seems terms of basically remove. Maybe needed to be removed, but seems a better way is actually first review videos in question and then remove if need. Still just seems in interest of saving time mass delate. Subscription pay platforms may work for some. I found when looked into one type of platform at first seemed promising, but as set up an account that was as far as know no interest. I had put out inquiry of what people interested in and not remember any feedback. Now while still have account, not see much point in posting when zero interest. Then think of all the others that sign up accounts, that realistically if one to pay to see certain content that go with whoever may be most popular. To make a simple point if one pays 50 creators $10 each for one month that is $500 for just one month. The variable is some may not have posted any new videos since 2018 or not post videos find interesting. While realize sites would have more than 50 creators not see as a practical method of sustainability. I can picture many deactivate accounts because whoever be top content creator pretty much be their own website. A better option is if charge a cost to see content of all the creators and if generate a certain amount of subscribers or interest to receive a bonus. Or pay a price to see website and option to send tips if like the content. As understand with the internet seems too much is hyped, too much of here today and deleted or hacked tomorrow. Then seems website benefits more than creators can create an imbalance. While website needs money,, along with creators think a way is needed to be fair so all sides receive money.. Otherwise if creator not receive any or little money will look to go to something else that get money for work. Paywalls to me not seem to work if originally had for free and not ask people to pay. Or if started out paying and is now free. Seems needs to be paying from the start. Or make clear is a sample only and pay to see or view the rest. I find some content not interesting, or content not see as worth paying for, but would want to learn first before plucking down a certain amount per month in addition to cost of internet or cellphone bill. Can add up very quickly the price. I find how just learned of a social media that closed same week would have considered joining. Later found a social media similar to what discontinued. In short seems as one website discontinued that a similar is ready to full void of similar set up. Not really practical to if a creator to post on different sites for time to make a photo or video to edit. Then the factor of deal with fake accounts, questionable business offers posted or sent to inbox. Lastly some can be rude or mean. Content creator is generally willing to listen to suggestions, but some sadly not seem to help in provide improvements. Their main point is to be mean and rude. I get how individuals have different tastes and interests, but creator would maybe work in an area that works for them. Also a clear description of what offer may eliminate confusion of content. However, creator needs to review and update if post content not originally posted. Sadly seems some fits the term troll in just want to stir things up without legitimate input, or suggestions for improvement. All says to content creator is need to use block and delete buttons and develop a toughness. Also if person signs up, and makes too many demands that think creator has a right to remove. The opposite is true if creator starts making demands of who signs up. In short see as a two way street in respect goes both ways. I would suggest one first review rules for if was to sign up as a creator and then know what requirements are rather join or not as creator. Then can decide if want to join as a fan, creator, or both. However, in one case I not join for website made so could only post or sell from website or business. Also a red flag if creator posts and in posting no longer owns the content. If posting adult content need to look at how verify adults viewing. Credit card or some other way to verify an adult to legally view adult content.

How I try to deal with annoying picture collectors. Any other ideas.I find on the apps, websites, etc. Of come across some that not seem to like, care or start demanding more pictures. I have a limit of how many pictures to share. For had one wanted another and better picture of my ass. First off not a easy position to take picture in hold camera and guess at if picture show. I figure if want more pictures that figure just a bleeping picture collector and have zero interest in actually meeting. Now I get some have certain tastes and like a certain look, but if get a picture and not interested that reactions can be silence, to rude, to like. I just wish if not interested to be up front about in a decent way. A simple sorry not interested would work. Then I think about i wonder if some so desperate for pictures that maybe should buy a gay magazine, dvd, go on website than be on a hookup app or site. I would add some share address or is given address and I guess is a virtual score where not go to actually meet. I find if picture collectors act extra annoying that think to block and some that blocked. I am not sure what of how sometimes be another way to deal with picture collectors. I think while some want to see a couple pictures to decide to meet. Others just wanting pictures can make harder to know if serious or just want pictures as share early on. However when seems individual almost directing pictures want to see, figure a picture collectors and why set a limit. Also lastly see as one lack respect if not want to share a face, body or other pictures. I mean if I just want oral why is person show ass picture. Or vice versa if just want to see ass, why sharing cock or face pictures? I try to be honest, upfront, and kind if not interested and I think is maybe biggest reason find picture collectors annoying in not accept if not interested.

[think before following links] https://www.vice.com/amp/en/article/jgqjjy/pornhub-suspended-all-unverified-videos-content?__twitter_impression=true&s=09 is article explains why Pornhub made the changes did. First in article about credit card companies suspend payment processing. The other is an organization that the parent organization wants to shut porn down. The article mentions more of a problem of material posted on Facebook than on pornhub. To be clear pornhub and Facebook wants to remove content that should be removed for those that are victims to not continue to be victimized. However in article mentions individuals asked pornhub for years to have a verification process. However the article mentions verification can still have problems but can see verification better that just posting without knowing if all parties agreed to video or not. Also to reduce unauthorized uploading of copyright materials. To sum up made changes to likely have credit card processing and reduce legal court filings.

I seen many videos on pornhub removed and ones remain not as generally interesting as ones taken down. At this point seems pornhub and if other websites follow that no longer see much interest to visit. Not knowing the reason for removal of videos, but maybe did to comply with a law or potential legal action. Or again the ads not bring in the money so put up a pay wall. If that the case then maybe should have charged to start with. Found can be hard to charge for something that was free. Again I don't know reasons why did what did and just some educated guesses.

I can see verify the account and individuals in the videos. Seems if verified a type of money making appeal if verified. The video may be ok or poorly made, that view can vary among wide audience. Some videos cut off with promotion to a website to see full versions of video. That may or not be worth it. What I think about is ads already on pornhub so shouldn't that cover much of the material. However verify process can in some cases be involved to where wonder if worth having an account. As different categories that not always sure amateur category is truly amateur. I think some maybe professional quality trying to look amateur. While can see important to review and remove if received credible reports of questionable content in videos. This can cover a wide range from illegal, to individuals filmed without permission, to revenge postings, etc. Another way to look at removed videos is can have some go and buy videos from adult bookstores if still open. However if looking for a specific video that may not see, or have to buy so many videos for maybe just a short clip. This also applies to magazines in sometimes not see what was looking for can seem a waste of money. Seen in small print models on packaging may not be in the film (and I would add magazines in not see or know for sure what actually buying). In other words can be a type of original click bait for videos and magazines. However the other side is some may post videos without wanting payment to just share video where all parties agreed to be in the video, that can picture was removed in pornhub mass purge. If pornhub is changing business model that may make more sense to make a new website. Also in removing so many videos can see as a type of censorship if on file all in video all agreed to be filmed. Then depending on the policy can be so broad remove so many categories that what one be interested in watching may no longer have any postings or deemed something cant post that many no longer use such websites. To end different individuals have different interests and would seem appeal to audience if legal made, all signed and know in the film that can make a business. Otherwise in remove so many videos can make websites seem similar to each other not really tell the difference. Or if that what website want then be better to be upfront in only want most popular and verified categories in attempt to make money. I can see just many quit using which is maybe the goal in the purge in just mass removal than careful review of videos. That would be alarming in attempt to save time just remove many videos even if technically video should remain unless evidence or information shows otherwise to remove. If vidrp has evidence or information to remove then remove but a review should be done first before mass delete.

Any travel in an RV (recreational vehicle) for travel through Iowa can give pleasure. Area is near Davenport Iowa and know of a area parking lot can park at for fun. I am a single white man, age 41, bwc. I can top or bottom. Can play safe or bareback. What are you looking for? If interested send a message to start arranging the fun meeting. Real here and ask questions.

Sometimes don't understand the games played in meeting. For example one asked so many questions and treated one as if not know that make where not want to meet. I not want to block users but seems some get so Annoying that seems only option, especially if extra pushy. I offered that go to adult bookstore but basically not interested. Sorry but not feel comfortable with car play for not want to deal with possibly police. The exception is if vehicle can be in a garage where private or mostly private. Or if one shares can't travel and other asks you to go to them shows not read profile. Almost seems not worth trying to hook up. For example thought when go to a place where hosted thought was to do something. Seemed all wanted to do was watch YouTube videos. What ? I remember profile wanted action and thought was what happen. From time to time see profile on apps but figure not visit for probably want to watch more videos. To be fair maybe they be more open to other fun but I not want to waste time. I can almost see why some delete meeting apps.

The best blowjob was from an ad answered on Craigslist back when had m4m section. Late at night. Think was 1 or 2 am. I will call him Ron. He knock on my door and I let him in. Remember had a earring and was ready to go. I sat in furniture chair and said suck my cock. I am 8 inches long. He started sucking me. He was able to deep throat me. I said how you do that. Needless to say, I was not able to last long. I think said am cumming and shortly after cum in his throat. I think blew a good sized load. Felt great and shortly after Ron left. Seemed was maybe 5 to 10 minutes total but can say is best blowjob had gotten.

Not know the law on matter of disclosure in Tennessee but heard one suppose to reveal status when knowingly have HIV/Aids. Story is upsetting for a problem first teacher abuse student. Next exposed student to HIV/Aids as was told had. Student should have been told and then know so can decline or if partake know possible risks. See different in adult make choices that may not care but still have a duty to inform. The student being less inclined to make decisions rational should not have exposed to life altering fate. Either way teacher should have informed.

I try to be upfront in if can't host at moment or can't travel at the time to save all parties time. Seems with internet I guess some want a virtual hookup where get address but not want to physically travel. I don't get that but best can figure for the flakes. Some I guess like play games of where may host but not Actually host. Not get but if actually host could have had fun. I find some uncomfortable if seem to pressure. I find better to not pressure and not be pushy. I think be hard to find individuals if only looking for a age range, from a city unless is large. If put too many limits on that likely find few fit search criteria. I guess a reason some like anonymous or dark room takes much of rejection away. Some not work for if can't host at moment or reply two days after day could host. Some may only be interested in one time and make most of. Others may like ongoing. All depends on preference. Find works well to be open for individuals age 18 or older for legal reasons, race, geography if open to someone from 20 miles or so away, individual preference of looks. Personality play a larger role. One can look great but personality can be lacking or shows could treat individuals nicer. Some not let know if no longer interested, but find helpful to be polite if decline.

It is possible the individual was sexually assaulted as a child, teen or younger adult. As to who if was abused can be hard to say. My guess is a true crime documentary or a book give details of life, background and crime. The victims may not have remembered if drug knocked them out which may help explain why not caught soon. I do wonder if individual had a alcohol or drug problem that was a factor in the crimes. A scary thought if individual was completely sober in crimes did. If was sober maybe for lack of term high in crime did and thought how got away with until caught. I bring up for true crime documentaries on Jeffrey Dahmer mention how he had an alcohol problem and is thought he had drank or was drunk when did crimes.

Father of UK’s worst rapist says son’s punishment ‘fits his crimes’ from Yahoo news, January 8, 2020. "Reynhard Sinaga was jailed for life with a minimum term of 30 years". According to the article the number of victims vary with the high of possible up to 200 men victims. The actual number of victims could be less or higher. Do wonder when crimes started that can explain the number of victims with time arrested. Mainly the article is a reminder to keep eye on drink and to decline a drink unless from bartender or is a closed containers such as beer can. The next thought is why individual commit crimes when could have used a website, app if wanted a hook up. An explanation could have been individual had trouble hooking up. This not excuse individuals behavior but is a scenario. Other possible reasons is a mention individual's family is Catholic and not open with self to go to a gay bar, visit website or app. One other possibility is individual considered self straight Or in denial of sexuality but wanted control and power over victims. The story is shocking to me. I hope the victims seek help need.

"Fire in the Blood" a 2012 documentary of raises questions about aids and other life saving drugs. A number of issues raised from access to drugs in other countries to how a doctor arrested for efforts to get generic drugs. The part think about is drug companies in documentary keep price high in Us while providing access to same drugs in other countries. Seemed point in documentary was to eliminate how drug company lose profits when make same or possibly more profit in a country and have available in another country.

As heard news in 2018 was a Jehovah Witness court case of court ordered fines due to sexual abuse. I was able to see I think title was 'Cults and Extreme Beliefs' Episode on the Jehovah Witnesses (JW) The episode about a woman abused growing up that attend a kingdom Hall. The irony was when visit Jehovah Witnesses headquarters or place in New York to talk to someone that no one come visit her in her vehicle. As paraphrase in case mix up what she said was "They (Jehovah Witnesses) goes to hundreds or millions of doors and no one can come talk to me. She made tough decision to submit letter to leave the Watchtower organization. What makes a hard decision is if she submitted letter earlier her mother told to have minimum contact. Her mother had passed and while not attend a kingdom Hall in years that finally decided to officially resign. When is more amazing is JW main librarian archivist saw reports going back years of abuse. I write so people should know what is going on before join a religion, group, club, organization to if one join that needs to take due diligence to keep youth and adults safe. In study of JW have strict rules, but leaves upsetting not prevent or report suspected abuse. Also read can get shunned if question, or not follow rules for minor items can face shunning. Of note JW not open to LGBT as studied. I visited a Kingdom Hall a couple of times. I have read their literature and find if read just that, my theory is pump out the literature so not have time to read other materials. I think in pump out the literature that if a member not watch program or read information reveal facts and information of abuse. Also miss out criticism of the Watchtower to hear arguments against and I guess for if stay a member. However as understand a JW can only read official publications. To me seems remove think for self if a rule. I think excommunication or punishment if elders learn about one is LGBT. The flip side from story of 2018 court case the board punish elder if decide to punish for abuse and say a year or so can't return then let them return to kingdom Hall again after a year or so. That seems messed up in kick out one that be LGBT that not abuse. Then punish and let abuser return. My own theory is Jehovah Witnesses and other groups such as Branch Davidens, Flds, etc. use End of the World to get members to submit if scare them. One can still believe about End of the World, but share how can be twisted for abuse.

The Netflix documentary I referred to is "The Family". Funny how try to type S at an instead get Sarah Palin. Imagery can be fun and symbols for rebellion. One can chose to see imagery or not. Also if one not into that free to look at items that be more of interest.

First Porn is fantasy. Porn can cover for different groups such as straight, bi, gay, transgender. Can cover many different combinations of for example different languages and races. As read posts that porn companies make what sells. My suggestion is if can't find porn of a black bottom to write company if can make. Also form own porn company to appeal to different groups if not find in videos. When comes down to it that if partner consents and agrees to be top, bottom or versitale should be all matters. While porn can portray some men as have big cocks that in real life men have different size and girth cocks. A different view on BBC, bwc, etc. In porn is one may have a big dick but if not know how to work cock for trouble getting hard that make view porn disappointing. Some may get used to just seeing one type of porn that not aware or know can see different such as Asian top, white bottom or white top and black bottom. Thus helpful to see posts on companies trying to fill niche. Customers need to share what want to see so companies can work to accommodate.

As for the symbolism my guess is for rebellion. Also if had the unfortunate to attend a church that dislikes lgbtq, Obama, Caitiln Jenner, one decides the hell with that church. I attended one such a church and would have left sooner but was shocked at what said and took a while to realize that never admit that church not going to change and what actually believe. That the pastors are stubborn in believe a Bible of parts only want to cherry pick. I can make a argument that the Bible has some dark themes such as rape, murder in Genesis Chapter 22, the story of King David that evangelicals and in Netflix documentary twist story to say God chose person to be in power and ok had an affair which then is twisted to let cheating Trump off the hook. Meanwhile evangelicals complain about Bill Clinton, but say nothing about Trump sex affairs, etc. I see inconsistency and double standards in church that is refreshing learn about left hand path that one can be one's self. That the Bible should have a warning label and that Sunday School only gives nice watered down stories. When if one reads as a teen or adult learn dark stories. Later after services can see why some may drink, do drugs or other activity to get away from such nonsense. Also I noticed a different church visit that people say some dumb things and I think put together a release of Sarah Palin, satanic, devil imagery. Some may not believe but use images as a type of rebellion. The other side is Satanic imagery fits better that say have crosses that many churches against same sex. However to be clear some churches allow lgbtq. The main point is why have a church goer complain about crosses or religious symbols when devil imagery that I can't speak for the Satanists and Lucifierians but my guess is that they be happy to see in videos , gifs and what not. On a fun side note I find in past a bit funny how some websites where some church or something try to read too much into things. For example if pastor Joel Osteen gives a hook em horns hand gesture that website interpret as satanic when picture was his son's University of Texas College Graduation. Seems I guess if one think Sarah Palin or devil is everywhere, then start seeing under rocks, pillows, or playing music backwards to hear demonic voices when now see won if read backwards if read too much into. To end goats in my observation seem to be independent in a group. Sheep can be herded. Be independent and not be in a herd. Hail Sarah Palin.

After reading posts remind me of times saw a Craigslist ad that think did a search of Craigslist with Jewish and that was for a Jewish woman wanting to be with a guy that was a nazi from casual encounter section when Craigslist had. I think remember something about tattoos. The ad seemed in my reaction to not make sense and maybe was power and fear issue. It was not what be looking for. I guess the poster of ad while a part of understandably repulsed that a part may have been attracted to. On the other side could have been a fake ad or a ad made as a dark joke. May have been a ad for a dark role play or something. My guess is just someone fantasy and not seem likely find such a person in real life. I remember years past reading a Newsweek story discuss some attraction to Nazism, but remember a part about how Nazi groups not exactly want gays and one mention about leather desire but a turn off if want to commit violence against gays. I am not into leather much and more so if hear negative in wear a leather jacket. One instead of have Nazi and leather, could have just motorcycle leather outfits to try to remove a negative Association. In the end if say one likes leather and the other not due to past experience or uncomfortable with that maybe forgo the leather or certain look. Or find someone into fetish. I personally want to not cause harm if brings problems to a partner and can be more important to just have fun.

Share https://m.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/stephen-port-who-were-the-four-men-murdered-by-the-grindr-killer_uk_5d1dfdfae4b04c48140ff65c?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAABuTyGFPxbcFJjXWg77wgNkUMxhqZXc89NcQquksh1NF9y0bMKZAePRSqRC9cy8UryfhiyG1b7RMKYhNkfyO--3kQNWWV88B4SqctBvAgHzOMA3NIvtiOH3sGjjl8gL2KOYJMmN8aia_jPaL7uZLw_9XmKYCdsIz5otmA9jqAjlz story of Grindr murders. I am not sure to scary but to make individuals alert and take precautions to what can go wrong with a online hookup. All takes us a few individuals with hidden reasons to put others on alert. While online sites and apps still be used that need to have steps in place for protection. Also advise to use instinct if something not seem right that leave or be ready to leave. Again share so others can be aware.

I know some deliver services have next day delivery. However, I am not sure what put sperm in type of container that stays fresh.