Phallarchist

Sexually-normal men necessarily define masculinity by the sheer force of their overwhelming preponderance in the population. And that includes reproducing as a matter of course. I definitely give a man more points if he fucks women and makes babies, because, well, that's the basic purpose of a man, his penis, and breeding. All other things being equal, I'll choose to be penetrated by a man whose seed has been successful. Such choices hardly ever present themselves in my life, but the hierarchy of value is straightforward.

In general, it's irrational to expect people who are attracted to males to desire anything other than the archetypes of the dominant hypermajority. That such men are largely unavailable is irrelevant to the fact of desire.

1 hour ago, SubSlutDog said:

So, that's why I started to wonder what's wrong with me.

Some cunt is just delicate. You got lucky, I say.

On 2/23/2022 at 3:08 AM, SubSlutDog said:

 

Can I ask please how can someone's hole be "always" clean? We eat and drink everyday, and we go to work. How can it be clean all the time?

I was also unaware of the Old Guard rule. Would you be kind enough to share a link or something to this please? Cause I'm quite into that.

It can't. It's as preposteous as it sounds.

On 2/23/2022 at 3:30 AM, SubSlutDog said:

Nearly every time the cum that comes out of me is pinkish, has some blood. Sometimes more, sometimes less...It's never gushing, and usually stops within minutes. But after it stops and I get bred, when I push the load out, it's pink...there's nothing wrong with my rectum.

So I'm just wondering how often do you guys have blood during or after anal? Is the cum that comes out of your sperm hole always pure white?

Note: please no std worshipping here. I share this as a problem.

You'll get no disease fetish from me. I'm positively avoidant. But there is no problem and there's definitely nothing wrong with your rectum or sigmoid colon. Penetration and copulation is an obvious misuse of these organs and the resulting minor bleeding is routine. It stops, you heal, and you're ready to be broken all over again. If you're worried about disease, screen your partners and reduce their number (to one perhaps).

I love the damage. The prospect of seeing blood mixed into my seed every time I fuck raises the value of a cuntmate considerably.

By local standards, I would likely be considered celibate. I had all of the experimental, low-quality encounters I needed to figure out what's what and am now mostly interested in sex with people I think are candidates for a long-term breeding relationship. I do not count oral service as a full sexual act and am inclined on occasion.

It's an irrelevant organ to me. I don't care if it swings around. A tiny, bunched-up one (I guess from one of those horrible cages) looks like a deformity. In that case, an actual clitoris would be better, and I might not totally ignore it.

20 hours ago, MuscledHorse said:

There is a company that does bukkake parties every month in various major cities.

I can't imagine the competition to be the target. Bitches must be shanking each other.

Full-length body hair, always, everywhere

I would estimate a lower limit of around 4 slim inches. If it's really thick, I might go lower. There would have to be some physical or personality feature to compensate for a merely nominal erection.

On 2/16/2022 at 11:38 PM, ErosWired said:

I’m more inclined toward the hyperspermia explanation - if it had been a case of fluid injected, it would likely have been released in a more continuous stream under pressure. What we see, however, are ejaculatory spurts consistent with emission by his body’s natural function. I do find myself wondering where someone with hyperspermia to that degree holds that amount of seminal fluid. No wonder he’s groaning like that.

I do want to believe.

Random guys at 18. Much too late a start with unimpressive men. I should have held out for quality.

On 2/3/2022 at 7:20 AM, DenverBtmDude said:

I wouldn't have thought that a man had this much cum, but the vid looks real...what to yall think? Could you imagine this man shooting in your hole! Woof!

My guess is that something that looks like semen was injected into the urethra beforehand.

Yes, because I don't believe in double standards and have always strongly wished that the boys I want to fuck had vaginas. I am indifferent as to whether they would have penises also.

It needs to be naturally hairy, no alterations.

On 8/7/2021 at 10:33 PM, ErosWired said:

While sexual sadism is a formal paraphilia, your narrative here and elsewhere does not seem to suggest that you exhibit such traits to that extremity. I have been in the hands of unquestionable sexual sadists for whose methods the word ‘untoward’ would be darkly humorous.

Rather, the kind of pleasure you describe I have found to be relatively widespread among penetrators of at least geater-than-average aggression and drive...

I'm certainly not competing to be the cruellest of them all. I might be on the low end of the range, but inflicting a bit of pain for my erotic satisfaction fits the definition of sexual sadism as I see it. It's just not my only mode.

I do find that plenty of men in general are at my level or above. Their urge to cause momentary suffering, at least, is commonplace and demands some accommodation. To what degree female masochism should be expected in return is a difficult question, but I doubt the realistic answer is "zero".

On 8/7/2021 at 10:33 PM, ErosWired said:

I’m not sure I see what is necessarily twisted in cunting males if certain males (such as myself) were by every indication born for that very purpose.

From the dirt to the dryness to the ill fit to the pain, rectal penetration is an unsubtle abuse of the organ. The very wrongness of it has to be enjoyed for its own sake. We are not born to this difficult and unproductive joining, but our desires twist us to it. We mate by grease and force and it is a most glorious abomination.

On 8/28/2021 at 9:56 PM, poptronic said:

It’s that “at first” part that’s got me nervous. I’m not worried about him opening me up. It’s the pounding I’m going to get once he does have me open.

Do you have an idea of how much you would be willing to suffer for him? Would you feel bad about asking him to stop?

On 8/28/2021 at 4:03 AM, ErosWired said:

If you spend much time reading through the topics in this forum, I think you can pretty easily get a sense of why this fetish is so underrepresented - the vast majority would probably view it as a shocking waste of semen.

Nothing prevents the target from opening his mouth. The remaining facial deposits can also be scooped in once the spectacle is complete. In fact, I would insist in it.

Bukkake style, yes, with the right victim as the target of degradation. But I don't want a bunch of men just delivering free seed. The boy has to earn each load in turn. It would be a gang-bang with carefully targeted ejaculation.

"Clean" is a perfectly normal shorthand for "free of STDs". The common phrase is "a clean bill of health". In reality, it's extremely common to acquire an HPV strain and have no idea that you carry it, but the general intent of limiting one's exposure to disease is thoroughly laudable. It's fortunately quite easy to skip over the "clean" sermons cluttering up the dating profiles of self-righteous bores, because they're all the same. I am thankful that I wasn't paying attention when the faggot clerisy formulated this point of orthodoxy. The testimonials and editorials must have been as interminable as the topic is trivial.

Be young and beautiful? There's no replacement, I'm afraid. Suck service is a basic entitlement and easy to find. Supply radically outstrips demand, so you have to be exceptional somehow. 

No. Even if I didn't dislike the animal words and most of the vague and euphemistic terms that are current, "pig" seems to have connotations that are too expansive. I'm not polymorphously perverse. I like plenty of unsanitary acts, but they don't involve solid waste and I don't roll around in muck of any sort. I'm not interested in doing just anything with anyone or everything with everyone. Pigs are thought to be indiscriminate. I have nothing but strong preferences.

Even so, I tend to think that I'm more likely to find compatibility with someone who considers himself "piggy" than otherwise. If you're with me, I will put what I want in your mouth and throat and you will suck and gulp it down. I don't think people who describe themselves as "pigs" have much scope to object to my emissions or the taste of rectum.

1 hour ago, daemien said:

Honestly, I don't know. I was 10 years old when I first sucked a cock. Instantly, I loved it. All of it. How it felt in my mouth, how he smelled, all of the tastes, especially his jizz. 

There was no getting enough. He knew whenever he saw me what I wanted, and even though at the very start we had promised to never tell anyone it wasn't long before I found myself sucking his friends cocks. By the age of 12 I was a fuck toy, but I think all of the sex stunted me. I found that even with a belly full of cum, i wasn't getting the emotional connectivity I longed for. 

There were no kisses. No hugs. Occasionally a thank you, slut. 

At 16 I hooked up with another man. After sex he verbally abused me. When he dropped me at home, I felt like nothing. A few weeks later, I ran away from home to go live with him. 

I took his abuse for 5 years before I left with only the clothes on my back. 

So yeah, I really don't know.

It's sad to hear that they wasted these opportunities for true erotic love.

1 hour ago, ErosWired said:

"Defense” implies unwillingness, though, does it not? While I understand and appreciate the sentiment you express, do you think it applies to a majority of Tops?

The anus has no will. Its resistance is reflexive. I defeat it in order to further abuse the length of the terminal passage. The boy might or might not be able to relax somewhat. The struggle to stretch his rings open might be brief. He could also clamp down and try to make penetration difficult, because he is s a masochist and wants to be forced. Both approaches have advantages. Spicy variety and all that.

I am a twisted male who puts boys to female (cunt) use and takes untoward pleasure in the difficulty my inappropriate intrusion causes. I do not use "top" as a sexual noun or verb and I have no real idea if "tops" in general are similar or dissimilar to me. My impression is that most habitual homosexual penetrators consider themselves sexual egalitarians and at least evince a concern for the comfort and pleasure of their receivers. I, on the other hand, seek to empower the phallus above all. I certainly appreciate and enjoy a sexually responsive cunt and the occasional spasm of a spontaneous prostate orgasm, but I am equally pleased to witness his suffering for my benefit. Self-sacrifice is a cardinal virtue for a receptive boy.

Let the boy mount his best defence. The pleasure of forcing him open rivals that of completing inside him.

I do like them much shorter. Rectum sex is awkward but the process is easier and feels more natural with a smaller boy. I want to push him around as necessary without feeling like I'm moving heavy furniture. I also like seeing my impact on him as I push deep into his little body.

That said, an inordinate number of rather tall men want me to ram them hard. They're often sturdy and their cunts can take a beating. So it's not out of the question.

As to masculinity: yes. Fat: no.